An extended brachial plexus blockade with an original method of catheter fixation: clinical case

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For extended blockade of the brachial plexus from the supraclavicular access, the catheter is fixed in the supraclavicular region. Owing to the anatomical features of the supraclavicular fossa and the short inner part of the catheter, this fixation method cannot be fully considered reliable and convenient both for the personnel operating the catheter and the patient. The most convenient place for fixing the catheter is the infraclavicular region because of its flat surface. If a catheter is installed to the brachial plexus from the supraclavicular access and the catheter is passed under the skin in the infraclavicular region, then the catheter exit site on the skin will be located further from the surgical intervention area and the inner part of the catheter will be larger.

CLINICAL CASE DESCRIPTION: This study describes a clinical case of blockade of the brachial plexus by interscalene access with catheterization for prolonged analgesia via supraclavicular access and fixation of the catheter under the skin in the subclavian region in an older patient with polymorbidity during surgical treatment of a closed fracture of the middle third of the humerus. In anesthetic provision, when inducing brachial plexus blockade via a supraclavicular approach, the catheter was fixed in the subcutaneous tunnel of the infraclavicular region for prolonged blockade of the brachial plexus.

CONCLUSION: This fixation method prevented internal and external dislocation of the catheter, which contributed to high-quality and long-term postoperative analgesia, early patient activity, and absence of infectious complications and created comfortable conditions for the handling of the catheter for both the medical staff and the patient.

About the authors

Oleg N. Yamshchikov

Derzhavin Tambov State University; Kotovsk City Clinical Hospital

Email: yamschikov.oleg@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6825-7599
SPIN-code: 9115-2547

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), department Professor, Medical Institute

Russian Federation, Tambov; Kotovsk

Alexander P. Marchenko

Derzhavin Tambov State University; Kotovsk City Clinical Hospital

Email: sashamarchen@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9387-3374
SPIN-code: 9253-4117

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Medical Institute

Russian Federation, Tambov; Kotovsk

Sergey A. Emelyanov

Derzhavin Tambov State University; Kotovsk City Clinical Hospital

Email: cep_a@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5550-4199
SPIN-code: 4368-8660

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Medical Institute

Russian Federation, Tambov; Kotovsk

Olga D. Ivanova

Dolgushin City Clinical Hospital No. 3

Author for correspondence.
Email: olg.dmi@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4895-8600
SPIN-code: 5800-8948

anesthesiologist-resuscitator

Russian Federation, Tambov

Ksenya A. Pavlova

Derzhavin Tambov State University

Email: ksenia.nickolaewa@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1931-0706
SPIN-code: 1407-5417

resident doctor, anesthesiologist-resuscitator, Medical Institute

Russian Federation, Tambov

References

  1. Fuzier R, Tissot B, Mercier-Fuzier V, et al. Evaluation of regional anesthesia procedure in an emergency department. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2002;21(3):193–197. (In French). doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(02)00585-3
  2. Zagrekov VI. The choice of technique of brachial plexus blockage in upper extremities surgeries. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2008;2(3):49–57. (In Russ).
  3. Orudjeva SA, Zvyagin AA, Agafonova SI, et al. Anesthesia for patients with surgical infections. Selection method. Wounds and wound infections. The prof. B.M. Kostyuchenok journal. 2014;1(2):24–30. (In Russ). doi: 10.25199/2408-9613-2014-1-2-24-30
  4. Krylov SV, Pasechnik IN, Sotnikov AV, Timchenko DО. Comparative evaluation of the use of a single and extended blockade of shoulder splitting at arthroscopic operations on the shoulder. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2018;12(4):211–216. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/1993-6508-2018-12-4-211-216
  5. Tsarev AP, Tarasov AN, Kurenkov EL, Nedzvetskii SV. Vozmozhnye oslozhneniya regionarnoi anestezii pri blokade plechevogo spleteniya. Bulletin of South Ural State University. 2012;28:73–78. (In Russ).
  6. Trukhin KS, Zabolotskii DV, Koriachkin VA, et al. Comparative evaluation of regional blockades during arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2018;12(4):242–249. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/1993-6508-2018-12-4-242-249
  7. Safin RR. Analysis of complications during different variants of brachial plexus blockade.Practical medicine.2018;16(7–1):65–66. (In Russ). doi: 10.32000/2072-1757-2018-16-7-65-66
  8. Trukhin KS. Regional blockades for arthroscopic treatment of recurrent shoulder instability in adolescents. Medicine: Theory and Practice. 2018;3(4):195–199. (InRuss).
  9. Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO, Carr DB, et al. Cousins and Bridenbaugh’s Neural Blockade in Clinical Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. London: Lippincott-Raven; 2009.
  10. Cho CH, Song KS, Min BW, et al. Efficacy of interscalene block combined with multimodal pain control for postoperative analgesia after rotator cuff repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(2):542–547. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2272-3
  11. Stukalov AA, Olifirova OS, Orazliev DA. Regionarnaya anesteziya: prakticheskoe posobie. Blagoveshchensk: OOO «ELT»; 2011. (In Russ).
  12. Marhofer P, Greher M, Kapral S. Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94(1):7–17. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei002

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Ultrasound picture of the spread of sodium chloride solution injected through a catheter installed to the brachial plexus by supraclavicular access through a Tuohy guide needle.Note. 1 — Tuohy’s needle, 2 — subclavian artery, 3 — catheter, 4 — brachial plexus, 5 — sodium chloride solution.

Download (223KB)
3. Fig. 2. The spinal needle is passed through the lumen of the Tuohy guide needle to the site of access to the brachial plexus.

Download (274KB)
4. Fig. 3. The proximal end of the catheter is fixed to the distal end of the spinal needle.

Download (301KB)
5. Fig. 4. The catheter is held and fixed under the skin of the subclavian area on the blockage side, and the proximal end of the catheter is on the opposite side.

Download (267KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies