Intravenous lidocaine infusion in children

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The problem of adequate analgesia in the early postoperative period is not relevant at present, both in our country and abroad because >50% of children experience pain after surgical interventions despite the ongoing therapy. Inadequate “ideal” method for assessing the pain syndrome severity, age restrictions with several drugs, and difficult communication with young children, as well as drug selection, lead to inadequate detection in pediatric practice.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravenous infusion of lidocaine in the early postoperative period in children operated on the abdominal cavity organs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 119 children who were randomized into 3 groups, in which intravenous lidocaine infusion, prolonged epidural blockade, or systemic fentanyl analgesia were used for pain relief after abdominal surgery. Hemodynamic parameters, respiratory system, pain intensity, resolution time of intestinal paresis, cortisol, glucose and lidocaine levels in blood plasma, and complications were monitored and compared intergroup.

RESULTS: Lidocaine infusion had no effects on the hemodynamics and respiratory system in children. Cortisol level was markedly decreased through the day to baseline (320±65 nmol/l). Early recovery of peristalsis corresponded to 23±3.75 h postoperatively. The pain syndrome intensity during the observation period did not exceed 2 points. The maximum level of free lidocaine in blood plasma was 2.81±1.31 µg/ml, and the time spent in the intensive care unit (ICU) was 48±10 h.

CONCLUSION: Intravenous infusion of lidocaine after abdominal surgery in children is a safe method that provides effective pain relief, restores peristalsis early, and reduces the length of ICU stay.

About the authors

Evgeny Y. Felker

Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: felkeru@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7780-8871
SPIN-code: 9244-0361
Scopus Author ID: 57223179573
ResearcherId: GOH-0546-2022

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

Maxim S. Fataliev

Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: fataliev.maxim@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4599-9730
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

Andrey O. Kolosov

Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: And-85@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8737-0802
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

Rustam N. Ibragimov

Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: Rustyibr@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5009-1938
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

Tatiana V. Tantseva

Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: felkeru@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5441-7870
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

Liliya V. Ivanova

Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: liliva@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3682-3995

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

Petr V. Gromov

Clinical Hospital “RZD-Medicine”

Email: gromovpv@rwmed.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9132-6388

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

Dmitry V. Zabolotsky

Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University; National Medical Research Center for Pediatric Traumatology and Orthopedics named after G.I. Turner

Email: zdv4330303@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6127-0798
SPIN-code: 6726-2571

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), professor

Russian Federation, St. Petersburg; St. Petersburg

Victor A. Koryachkin

Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: vakoryachkin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3400-8989
SPIN-code: 6101-0578

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

References

  1. Ovechkin AM, Yavorovskii AG. Bezopioidnaya analgeziya v khirurgicheskoi praktike: rukovodstvo dlya vrachei. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2019. 240 p. (In Russ).
  2. Makhlouf MM, Garibay ER, Jenkins BN, et al. Postoperative pain: factors and tools to improve pain management in children. Pain Manag. 2019;9(4):389–397. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2018-0079
  3. Rabbitts JA, Fisher E, Rosenbloom BN, Palermo TM. Prevalence and Predictors of Chronic Postsurgical Pain in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pain. 2017;18(6):605–614. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.03.007
  4. Zabolotskii DV. Prodlennaya mestnaya anesteziya u detei s ortopedicheskoi patologiei [dissertation]. Saint Petersburg: SpbGPMU; 2015. (In Russ).
  5. Zabolotskiy DV, Koryachkin VA. Child and regional anesthesia – What for? Where? And how? Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2016;10(4):243–253. (In Russ). doi: 10.18821/1993-6508-2016-10-4-243-253
  6. Zabolotski DV, Koriachkin VA, Ulrikh GE. Postoperative Analgesia in Children. Are There Any Methods Available Today? Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2017;11(2):64–72. (In Russ). doi: 10.18821/1993-6508-2017-11-2-64-72
  7. Ovechkin AM, Becker AA. Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion as a Perspective Component of Multimodal Analgesia, Which Affects on Early Postoperative Outcome. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2017;11(2):73–83. (In Russ). doi: 10.18821/1993-6508-2017-11-2-73-83
  8. Koscielniak-Merak B, Batko I, Kobylarz K, et al. Intravenous, Perioperatively Administered Lidocaine Regulates Serum Pain Modulators’ Concentrations in Children Undergoing Spinal Surgery. Pain Med. 2020;21(7):1464–1473. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz212
  9. Weibel S, Jelting Y, Pace NL, et al. Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;6:CD009642. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009642.pub3
  10. Weinberg L. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lignocaine: A review. World Journal of Anesthesiology. 2015;4(2):17. doi: 10.5313/wja.v4.i2.17
  11. Downes H, Loehning RW. Local anesthetic contracture and relaxation of airway smooth muscle. Anesthesiology. 1977;47(5):430–436. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197711000-00008
  12. Clivio S, Putzu A, Tramer MR. Intravenous Lidocaine for the Prevention of Cough: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Anesth Analg. 2019;129(5):1249–1255. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003699
  13. Koryachkin VA. Neiroaksial’nye blokady. 2-e izd. Saint Petersburg: ELBI-Spb; 2017. (In Russ).
  14. Boeckxstaens GE, de Jonge WJ. Neuroimmune mechanisms in postoperative ileus. Gut. 2009;58(9):1300-1311. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.169250
  15. Wongyingsinn M, Baldini G, Charlebois P, et al. Intravenous lidocaine versus thoracic epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery using an enhanced recovery program. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36(3):241–248. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820d4362
  16. Aliev MM, Dekhqonboev AA, Yuldashev RZ. Advantages of abdominal ultrasound in the management of infants with necrotizing enterocolitis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2017;33(2):213–216. doi: 10.1007/s00383-016-4017-8
  17. Weibel S, Rucker G, Eberhart LH, et al. Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;10:CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2
  18. van der Wal SE, van den Heuvel SA, Radema SA, et al. The in vitro mechanisms and in vivo efficacy of intravenous lidocaine on the neuroinflammatory response in acute and chronic pain. Eur J Pain. 2016;20(5):655–674. doi: 10.1002/ejp.794
  19. Soto G, Naranjo Gonzalez M, Calero F. Intravenous lidocaine infusion. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2018;65(5):269–274. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2018.01.004

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Terms of restoration of intestinal motility in children in the study groups after abdominal interventions.Note: * p <0.05 when comparing indicators between the first and second groups; **p <0.05 when comparing indicators between the first and third groups.

Download (70KB)
3. Fig. 2. The intensity of pain syndrome according to the Wong-Baker scale after surgical interventions on the abdominal organs in childrenNote: *p <0.05 when comparing indicators between the first and second groups; **p <0.05 when comparing indicators between the first and third groups.

Download (246KB)
4. Fig. 3. The content of lidocaine (µg/ml) in the blood plasma of patients at the stages of the study.

Download (73KB)

Copyright (c) 2022 Felker E.Y., Fataliev M.S., Kolosov A.O., Ibragimov R.N., Tantseva T.V., Ivanova L.V., Gromov P.V., Zabolotsky D.V., Koryachkin V.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies