The efficiency of congenital cataract management in children

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to analyze the results of congenital cataract treatment in children who underwent surgery in VP Vyhodcev Eye Hospital from 2015 to 2019 and to compare these data with global results.

Material and methods: A retrospective analysis of electronic outpatient medical records of children who underwent surgery for congenital cataract during the period from 2015 to 2019 included the following parameters: age at the first admission to the Eye Hospital, delay between the first admission and cataract surgery, age at surgery, best corrected visual acuity at the end of follow-up, and presence of any eye comorbidities. To compare the obtained data with the results of similar studies worldwide, articles on this topic published during the past 5 years were searched.

Results: This retrospective study analyzed 71 electronic outpatient medical records of children with congenital cataract (96 eyes). The age at the first admission was 33.5 [60.0–81.5] months. The best corrected visual acuity before surgery was 0.2 [0.1–0.4]. The delay between the first admission and cataract surgery was 5.0 [2.5–12.0] months; thus, children underwent surgery for congenital cataract at age 51 [14.5–94.5] months. In all patients, lens aspiration with intraocular lens implantation resulted in significant improvement of visual acuity to 0.4 [0.1–0.9]. The comparative analysis revealed a trend for earlier recognition and surgical treatment of congenital cataract in European countries, while a significant delay before surgery and worse visual outcomes are common in developing countries.

Conclusion: The current state of ophthalmological care for children with congenital cataract in Russia allows achieving good visual outcomes comparable with published results in Europe. Nonetheless, further studies are required to determine reasons for later recognition and surgery of congenital cataract in children

About the authors

Daria S. Afanasyeva

V.P. Vyhodcev Eye Hospital

Email: ada-tomsk@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6950-6497
SPIN-code: 1832-4566

MD, PhD, ophthalmologist

Russian Federation, Omsk

Vasilii A. Zhadan

V.P. Vyhodcev Eye Hospital

Author for correspondence.
Email: v.a.zhadan@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9910-5029

ophthalmologist

Russian Federation, Omsk

References

  1. Foster A, Gilbert C. Cataract in children. Acta Paediatr. 2003;92(12):1376-1378. doi: 10.1080/08035250310007556
  2. Gilbert C, Foster A. Childhood blindness in the context of VISION 2020--the right to sight. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):227-232. PMC2566382
  3. Sheeladevi S., Lawrenson J.G., Fielder A.R., Suttle C.M. Global prevalence of childhood cataract: a systematic review. Eye. 2016; 30: 1160–1169. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.156
  4. Neroev VV, Katargina LA, editors. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii: vrozhdennaya katarakta. Moscow; 2017 (In Russ).
  5. Dawe NW. Visual development, 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2006
  6. Chan WH, Biswas S, Ashworth JL, Lloyd IC. Congenital and infantile cataract: aetiology and management. Eur J Pediatr. 2012;171(4):625-630. doi: 10.1007/s00431-012-1700-1
  7. Rajavi Z, Sabbaghi H. Congenital Cataract Screening. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016;11(3):310-312. doi: 10.4103/2008-322X.188389
  8. Sijssens KM, Rijkers GT, Rothova A, et al. Distinct cytokine patterns in the aqueous humor of children, adolescents and adults with uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2008;16(5):211-216. doi: 10.1080/09273940802409969
  9. Wu X, Liu Z, Wang D, et al. Preoperative profile of inflammatory factors in aqueous humor correlates with postoperative inflammatory response in patients with congenital cataract. Mol Vis. 2018;24:414-424. PMC5993531
  10. Pashtaev NP, Pozdeyeva NA, Bat’kov EN, et al. The results of the treatment of cataract in the children and adolescents at the age under 14 years. Russian Pediatric Ophthalmology. 2016;11(2):77-81. (In Russ). doi: 10.18821/1993-1859-2016-11-2-77-81
  11. Katargina LA, Kruglova TB, Egiyan NS, Trifonova OB. Rehabilitation of the children following extraction of congenital cataracts. Russian Pediatric Ophthalmology. 2015;10(4):38-42. (In Russ).
  12. Ambroz SC, Toteberg-Harms M, Hanson JVM, et al. Outcome of Pediatric Cataract Surgeries in a Tertiary Center in Switzerland. J Ophthalmol. 2018;2018:3230489. doi: 10.1155/2018/3230489
  13. Sheeladevi S, Lawrenson JG, Fielder A, et al. Delay in presentation to hospital for childhood cataract surgery in India. Eye (Lond). 2018;32(12):1811-1818. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0176-2
  14. Umar MM, Abubakar A, Achi I, et al. Pediatric cataract surgery in National Eye Centre Kaduna, Nigeria: outcome and challenges. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2015;22(1):92-96. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.148356
  15. Sen P, Gupta N, Mohan A, et al. Causes of delayed presentation of pediatric cataract: A questionnaire-based prospective study at a tertiary eye care center in central rural India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(4):603-607. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_872_19
  16. Hansen MM, Bach-Holm D, Kessel L. Visual outcomes after surgery for childhood cataracts. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020;98(6):579-584. doi: 10.1111/aos.14403
  17. Chen J, Chen Y, Zhong Y, Li J. Comparison of visual acuity and complications between primary IOL implantation and aphakia in patients with congenital cataract younger than 2 years: a meta-analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(3):465-473. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000015

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2021 Eco-Vector


 


Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).