Peripheral spatial contrast sensitivity of the eyes
- Authors: Tarutta E.P.1, Kondratova S.E.1, Milash S.V.1, Tarasova N.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases
- Issue: Vol 18, No 1 (2023)
- Pages: 21-27
- Section: Original study article
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1993-1859/article/view/131779
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/rpoj138658
- ID: 131779
Cite item
Abstract
AIM: To develop a method for evaluating peripheral spatial contrast sensitivity and to use it in comparative studies of peripheral spatial contrast sensitivity in children with myopia under correction conditions with glasses with a highly aspherical lenslet (HAL) and single vision lenses (SVL).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A method for evaluating peripheral spatial contrast sensitivity was developed, in which visual control was carried out with the patient’s gaze fixed in the forward direction using a remote binocular autorefractometer, and the test image was sent to the selected area of the retina periphery. The SVL values were evaluated in three ranges of spatial frequencies, namely, low (0.5–2.0 cycle/deg), medium (4.0 to 8.0 cycle/deg), and high (11.31–16.0 cycle/deg). Peripheral spatial contrast sensitivity was examined descriptively in 20 patients with low and moderate myopia. The age of the patients ranged from 8 to 13 (average, 11.4±1.5) years, and the degree of myopia ranged from −1.0 to −3.75 (average, −2.66±1.5 D). The patients were examined in glasses with HAL and in a trial frame with SVL correction.
RESULTS. In HAL, which induces volumetric myopic defocus on the periphery of the retina, the peripheral spatial contrast sensitivity was lower than that in the SVL. This decrease was most pronounced at medium and high spatial frequencies, where it reached 30–50%. The revealed differences in the peripheral spatial contrast sensitivity at high frequencies (8; 11.31 and 16 cycles/deg) were statistically significant: 7.5 and 10.8 at the frequency of 8 cycles/deg, 5.8 and 9.05 at the frequency of 11.31 cycles/deg, and 4.4 and 9.2 at the frequency of 16 cycles/deg, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The peripheral spatial contrast sensitivity in glasses with rings of HAL, compared with the peripheral spatial contrast sensitivity in SVL, is significantly reduced at high spatial frequencies.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Elena P. Tarutta
Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases
Email: elenatarutta@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8864-4518
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Рrofessor
Russian Federation, MoscowSvetlana E. Kondratova
Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases
Author for correspondence.
Email: svetlana26.03@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6522-5310
SPIN-code: 9095-2169
ophthalmologist
Russian Federation, MoscowSergey V. Milash
Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases
Email: sergey_milash@yahoo.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3553-9896
SPIN-code: 5224-4319
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, MoscowNatalia A. Tarasova
Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases
Email: tar221@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3164-4306
SPIN-code: 3056-4316
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Campbell FW, Robson JG. Аpplication of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. J Physiol. 1968;197(3):551–566. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008574
- Arden GB. The importance of measuring contrast sensitivity in cases of visual disturbance. Br J Ophthalmol. 1978;62(4):198–209. doi: 10.1136/bjo.62.4.198
- Volkov VV. Pokazateli vizo- i refraktometrii v otsenke zritel’noi rabotosposobnosti. Oftal’mologicheskii zhurnal. 1986;8:455–457. (In Russ).
- Danilichev VF, editor. Sovremennaya oftal’mologiya: Rukovodstvo. 2nd ed., rev. and exp. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2009. (In Russ).
- Belozerov AE. Razrabotka i vnedrenie komp’yuternykh funktsional’nykh metodov v oftal’mologii [dissertation]. Moscow; 2003. Available from: https://www.dissercat.com/content/razrabotka-i-vnedrenie-kompyuternykh-funktsionalnykh-metodov-v-oftalmologii. Accessed: 10.02.2023. (In Russ).
- Applegate RA, Howland HC, Sharp RP, et al. Corneal aberrations and visual performance after radial keratotomy. J Refract Surg. 1998;14(4):397–407. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-19980701-05
- Chwesiuk М, Mantiuk R. Measurements of contrast sensitivity for peripheral vision. ACM Symposium on Applied Perception. 2019;20:1–9. doi: 10.1145/3343036.3343123
- Kerber KL, Thorn F, Bex PJ, Vera-Diaz FA. Peripheral contrast sensitivity and attention in myopia. Vision Res. 2016;125:49–54. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.05.004
- Rappon J, Neitz J, Neitz M. Novel DOT Lenses from SightGlass Vision Show Great Promise to Fight Myopia [Internet]. Review of Myopia Management [cited 10 February 2023]. Available from: https://reviewofmm.com/novel-dot-lenses-from-sightglass-vision-show-great-promise-to-fight-myopia/
- Xu Z, Zhuang Y, Chen Z, et al. Assessing the contrast sensitivity function in myopic parafovea: A quick contrast sensitivity functions study. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:971009. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.971009
- Smith EL 3rd, Kee CS, Ramamirtham R, et al. Peripheral vision can influence eye growth and refractive development in infant monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(11):3965–3972. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0445
- Patent application RUS N 2022134814 from 12/28/2022. Tarutta E.P., Kondratova S.E. Tarasova N. A., Milash S.V. Method of studying peripheral contrast sensitivity of the eyes. (In Russ).
- Bao J, Huang Y, Li X, et al. Spectacle Lenses With Aspherical Lenslets for Myopia Control vs Single-Vision Spectacle Lenses: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022;140(5):472–478. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.0401