Family-school interaction: parents’ needs, assessment, and expectations

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Modern Russian and international studies show that the interaction between school and family as subjects of the educational process has several positive outcomes for all participants: improved student performance, increased teacher effectiveness, and a positive impact on family well-being. However, parental involvement in their children’s school life is hindered by various factors, including institutional and organizational barriers, teachers’ lack of readiness, as well as the needs and capabilities of the families themselves. To identify family needs and expectations of school activities, a survey was conducted among 60 parents of students in grades 5–8 at general education schools in Smolensk. During the analysis, the responses were further divided into groups based on student age and academic performance. It was found that parents are generally satisfied with various aspects of interaction between teachers and both students and parents (openness, friendliness, support). They appreciate the opportunities for communication with teachers, administration, and other specialists through both traditional and remote channels. Parents are informed about school life, and the predominant type of involvement is passive observation (more than 80 %), while active involvement is regularly practiced by no more than a quarter of respondents. There is a noted low level of interest in parent-specific events and participation in school organization activities as a whole. Parents of students in grades 7 and 8, as well as those with high academic performance, demonstrate greater activity in interacting with the school and involvement in events. The results indicate the need for schools to foster active types of parental involvement and adopt a differentiated approach to organizing such activities.

About the authors

Faina M. Kremen

Smolensk State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: fmkremen@gmail.com

Cand. Psych. Sci., Associate Professor at the Department of Social Work

Russian Federation, 4, st. Przhevalsky, Smolensk, 214000

Sergei A. Kremen

Smolensk State University

Email: skremen@yandex.ru

Cand. Ped. Sci., Associate Professor at the Department of Pedagogy and Psychology

Russian Federation, 4, st. Przhevalsky, Smolensk, 214000

References

  1. Plan osnovnykh meropriyatii po provedeniyu v Rossiiskoi Federatsii Goda sem’i [Plan of the main events for holding the Year of the Family in the Russian Federation]. https://семья2024.рф/documents/265 (accessed October 10, 2024).
  2. Burina E.A., Kudinova A.E. Osobennosti sovremennoi rossiiskoi sem’i v usloviyakh sotsial’no-istoricheskikh izmenenii instituta roditel’stva [Modern Russian Family in the Context of Socio-Historical Changes of Parenthood]. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta. 2020. Vol. 8. No. 1 (30). P. 6. doi: 10.26795/2307-1281-2020-8-1-6.
  3. Goshin M.E., Mertsalova T.A., Gruzdev I.A. Tipy roditel’skogo uchastiya v uchebnom protsesse detei [Types of parental involvement in children’s schooling]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny. 2019. No. 2. Pp. 282–303. doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2019.2.13.
  4. Antipkina I.V. Issledovaniya «roditel’skoi vovlechennosti» v Rossii i za rubezhom [Research of Parent Involvement in Russia and Abroad]. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika. 2017. Vol. 1. No. 4 (41). Pp. 102–114.
  5. Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press, 1979. 352 p.
  6. Turnbull A.P., Turnbull H.R., Erwin E.J. et al. Families, professionals, and exceptionality: Positive outcomes through partnerships and trust. Pearson, 2015. 432 p.
  7. Reschly A.L., Christenson S.L. Parents as essential partners for fostering student’s learning outcomes. In R. Gilman, E.S. Huebner, M. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in schools. New York, NY: Routledge, 2009. Pp. 257–272.
  8. Belousov K.Yu., Matyushkina M.D. Uchastie roditelei v obrazovanii svoikh detei i v obrazovatel’noi politike shkoly [Parent’s Participation in the Education of their Children and in the School’s Educational Policy]. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2020. No. 5 (47). Pp. 222–245. doi: 10.32744/pse.2020.5.16.
  9. Seliverstova I.V., Kosaretskii S.G. Uchastie roditelei v formirovanii obrazovatel’noi politiki shkoly: kommunikativnye bar’ery [Parental participation in the formation of school educational policy: communication barriers]. Tendentsii razvitiya obrazovaniya: 20 let reform, chto dal’she?: materialy VI Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, Moskva, 13–15 fevralya 2009 g. Moskovskaya vysshaya shkola sotsial’nykh i ekonomicheskikh nauk [Trends in the development of education: 20 years of reforms, what next?: Proceedings of the VI International scientific and practical conference. Moscow Higher School of Social and Economic Sciences]. Moscow: Universitetskaya kniga Publ., 2009. Pp. 201–212.
  10. Goshin M.E., Mertsalova T.A. Tipy roditel’skogo uchastiya v obrazovanii, sotsial’no-ekonomicheskii status sem’i i rezul’taty obucheniya [Types of Parental Involvement in Education, Socio-Economic Status of the Family, and academic results]. Voprosy obrazovaniya. 2018. No. 3. Pp. 68–90. doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2018-3-68-90.
  11. Kremen S.A. Problema roditel’skogo uchastiya v obrazovatel’nykh traektoriyakh detei [The Problem of Parental Engagement in Children’s Educational Trajectories]. Perspektivy razvitiya sotsial’noi raboty, sotsial’noi pedagogiki i obrazovaniya v Smolenskom regione s pozitsii budushchikh spetsialistov: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov prepodavatelei i studentov [Prospects for the development of social work, social pedagogy and education in the Smolensk region from the perspective of future specialists: Collection of scientific papers of teachers and students]. Kirov: MCITO Publ., 2023. Pp. 37–43.
  12. Kozhurova O.Yu. Sotsial’noe partnerstvo shkoly i sem’i kak faktor povysheniya ikh vospitatel’nogo potentsiala: Avtoref. dis. kand. ped. nauk [Social Partnership Between School and Family as a Factor in Increasing their Educational Potential: Abstract of thesis cand. of ped. sci.]. Moscow, 2011. 23 p.
  13. Sheina M.B. Razvitie i realizatsiya vospitatel’nogo potentsiala sem’i v usloviyakh sotsial’nogo partnerstva so shkoloi: Avtoref. dis. kand. ped. nauk [Development and implementation of the educational potential of the family in the context of social partnership with the school: Abstract of thesis cand. of ped. sci.]. Ufa, 2013. 31 p.
  14. Khomenko I.A. Shkola i roditeli: etapy razvitiya sotsial’nogo partnerstva [School and Parents: Stages of Development of Social Partnership]. Pedagogicheskoe obozrenie. 2008. No. 4 (79). Pp. 7–8.
  15. Markow D., Macia L., Lee H. The MetLife survey of the American teacher: Challenges for school leadership. New York, NY: MetLife, 2013. 132 p.
  16. Pearson J.N., Akamoglu Y., Chung M. et al. Building Family – Professional Partnerships with Culturally, Linguistically, and Economically Diverse Families of Young Children. Multicultural Perspectives. 2019. Vol. 21 (4). Pp. 208–216. doi: 10.1080/15210960.2019.1686381.
  17. Haines S.J., Reyes C.C., Ghising H. et al. Family-professional partnerships between resettled refugee families and their children’s teachers: exploring multiple perspectives. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth. 2021. Vol. 66 (1). Pp. 52–63. doi: 10.1080/1045988X.2021.1934375.
  18. Gershwin T. Legal and Research Considerations regarding the Importance of Developing and Nurturing Trusting Family-Professional Partnerships in Special Education Consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation. 2020. Vol. 30 (4). Pp. 420–436. doi: 10.1080/10474412.2020.1785884.
  19. Lawson M.A. School-family relations in context: Parent and teacher perceptions of parent involvement. Urban Education. 2003. Vol. 38 (1). Pp. 77–133. doi: 10.1177/0042085902238687.
  20. Francis G.L., Blue-Banning M., Haines S.J. et al. Building «Our School»: Parental Perspectives for Building Trusting Family–Professional Partnerships. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth. 2016. Vol. 60 (4). Pp. 329–336. doi: 10.1080/1045988X.2016.1164115.
  21. Korotaeva E.V., Andryunina A.S., Chugaeva I.G. Dialogicheskoe vzaimodeistvie sem’i i shkoly: soderzhatel’nyi aspekt [Dialogical interaction between family and school: The content aspect]. Obrazovanie i nauka. 2023. No. 25 (3). Pp. 97–121. doi: 10.17853/1994-5639-2023-3-97-121.
  22. Epstein J.L. Ready or Not? Preparing Future Educators for School, Family, and Community Partnerships. Teaching Education. 2013. Vol. 24 (2). Pp. 115–118. doi: 10.1080/10476210.2013.786887.
  23. Dunst C.J. Rethinking early intervention. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities. 1985. Vol. 5. P. 165–201.
  24. Blue-Banning M., Summers J.A., Frankland H.C. et al. Dimensions of family and professional partnerships: Constructive guidelines for collaboration. Exceptional Children. 2004. Vol. 70 (2). Pp. 167–185. doi: 10.1177/001440290407000203.
  25. Bryk A.S., Schneider B.L. Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 2002. 240 p.
  26. Forsyth P.B., Barnes L.L.B., Adams C.M. Trust-effectiveness patterns in schools. Journal of Educational Administration. 2006. Vol. 44 (2). Pp. 122–141. doi: 10.1108/09578230610652024.
  27. Tschannen-Moran M., Hoy W.K. A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research. 2000. Vol. 70 (4). Pp. 547–593. doi: 10.3102/00346543070004547.
  28. Bourdieu P. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977. 255 p. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511812507.
  29. Harris A., Goodall J. Do Parents Know They Matter? Engaging All Parents in Learning. Educational Research. 2008. Vol. 50 (3). Pp. 277–289.
  30. Dunst C.J. Family-centered practices: Birth through high school. Journal of Special Education. 2002. Vol. 36 (3). Pp. 139–147.
  31. Pavlenko K.V., Dement’eva Yu.O. Rol’ sem’i v obrazovanii rebenka: konstruirovanie obrazovatel’nogo prostranstva i kommunikatsiya so shkoloi [The Role of the Family in the Child’s Education: Construction of the Educational Space and Communication with the School]. Informatsionnyi byulleten’: Monitoring ekonomiki obrazovaniya. Moscow: NIU «VShE» Publ., 2022. No. 5 (22). 52 p.
  32. Bysik N.V., Evstigneeva N.V., Kosaretskii S.G. i dr. Uchastie roditelei v shkol’nom obrazovanii: vybor, vozmozhnosti, vovlechennost’ [Parental Participation in School Education: Choice, Opportunities, Involvement]. Informatsionnyi byulleten’: Monitoring ekonomiki obrazovaniya. Moscow: NIU «VShE» Publ., 2017. No. 19 (118). 32 p.
  33. Summers J.A., Marquis J., Mannan H. et al. Relationship of Perceived Adequacy of Services, Family-Professional Partnerships, and Family Quality of Life in Early Childhood Service Programmes. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. 2007. Vol. 54 (3). Pp. 319–338. doi: 10.1080/10349120701488848.
  34. Francis G.L., Gross J.M.S., Turnbull A.P. et al. The Family Employment Awareness Training (FEAT) program in Kansas: A mixed method follow-up. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation. 2013. Vol. 39. Pp. 167–181. doi: 10.3233/JVR-130652.
  35. Epstein J.L., Salinas K.C. Partnering with families and communities. Educational Leadership. 2004. Vol. 61 (8). Pp. 12–18.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. Distribution of responses of different groups of parents to the question about the conditions for good academic performance of schoolchildren, %

Download (457KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2. Parents' assessment of statements about teachers

Download (261KB)
Indexing metadata
4. Fig. 3. Distribution of affirmative answers of different groups of parents to the question “Do you have the opportunity to contact us regarding your child’s academic performance and receive a timely answer?”, %

Download (381KB)
Indexing metadata
5. Fig. 4. Distribution of responses of different groups of parents to the question about forms of participation in school activities, %

Download (238KB)
Indexing metadata
6. Fig. 5. Distribution of parents’ responses on ways of expressing parental opinions at school, %

Download (251KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2025 Kremen F.M., Kremen S.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».