Application of the models of the middle and upper atmosphere to simulation of total electron content perturbations caused by the 2009 stratospheric warming
- Authors: Klimenko M.V.1,2, Klimenko V.V.1, Bessarab F.S.1,2, Korenkov Y.N.1, Rozanov E.V.3, Reddmann T.4, Zakharenkova I.E.1, Tolstikov M.V.5
-
Affiliations:
- Western Department of Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere, and Radio Waves Propagation
- Kant Baltic Federal University
- Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium
- Karlsruher Institut für Technologie IMK-ASF
- Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Siberian Branch
- Issue: Vol 10, No 1 (2016)
- Pages: 109-116
- Section: Chemical Physics of Atmospheric Phenomena
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1990-7931/article/view/197259
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793116010097
- ID: 197259
Cite item
Abstract
Sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) is a unique atmospheric phenomenon, which consists in a rapid rise of temperature at altitudes of ~30–40 km in high latitudes of the winter, typically, northern hemisphere. Modeling SSW effects in the mesosphere, thermosphere, and ionosphere is a challenging problem, because it must be done on a global scale, with consideration of numerous physical and chemical processes. This paper reports the results of calculations of the characteristics of total electron content (TEC) perturbations for the conditions of the SSW event in January 2009. The calculations are performed using the Global Self-Consistent Model of the Thermosphere, Ionosphere and Protonosphere (GSM TIP) supplemented by the lower boundary conditions in the form of space–time distributions of the basic parameters of the mesosphere at an altitude of 80 km, as calculated by the SOCOL, KASIMA, and TIME GCM models. The simulation results show that, for some versions, the spatial distribution of total electron content disturbances ΔTEC shows a qualitative agreement with experimental data; however, the values of ΔTEC in all variants of calculations proved to be an order of magnitude lower than the measured.
About the authors
M. V. Klimenko
Western Department of Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere, and Radio Waves Propagation; Kant Baltic Federal University
Author for correspondence.
Email: office@wdizmiran.ru
Russian Federation, Kaliningrad; Kaliningrad
V. V. Klimenko
Western Department of Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere, and Radio Waves Propagation
Email: office@wdizmiran.ru
Russian Federation, Kaliningrad
F. S. Bessarab
Western Department of Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere, and Radio Waves Propagation; Kant Baltic Federal University
Email: office@wdizmiran.ru
Russian Federation, Kaliningrad; Kaliningrad
Yu. N. Korenkov
Western Department of Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere, and Radio Waves Propagation
Email: office@wdizmiran.ru
Russian Federation, Kaliningrad
E. V. Rozanov
Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium
Email: office@wdizmiran.ru
Switzerland, Davos
T. Reddmann
Karlsruher Institut für Technologie IMK-ASF
Email: office@wdizmiran.ru
Germany, Karlsruhe
I. E. Zakharenkova
Western Department of Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere, and Radio Waves Propagation
Email: office@wdizmiran.ru
Russian Federation, Kaliningrad
M. V. Tolstikov
Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Siberian Branch
Email: office@wdizmiran.ru
Russian Federation, Irkutsk
Supplementary files
