Isolation of Extracellular Microvesicles from Cell Culture Medium: Comparative Evaluation of Methods


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EV) are secreted by cells of multicellular organisms. EV mediate specific mode of intercellular communication by “horizontal” exchange of substances and information. This phenomenon seems to have an essential biological significance and became a subject of intensive research. Biogenesis, structural and functional EV features are usually studied in vitro. Several methods of EV isolation from cell culture medium are currently used; however, selection of a particular method may have a significant impact on obtained results. The choice of the optimal method is usually determined by the amount of starting biomaterial and the aims of the research. We have performed a comparative analysis of four different methods of EV isolation from cell culture medium: differential ultracentrifugation, ultracentrifugation with 30% sucrose/D2O “cushion,” precipitation with plant proteins and latex-based immunoaffinity capturing. EV isolated from several human glial cell lines by different approaches were compared in terms of the following parameters: size, concentration, EV morphology, contamination by non-vesicular particles, content of exosomal tetraspanins on the EV surface, content of total proteins, total RNA, and several glioma-associated miRNAs. The applied methods included nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), dynamic light scattering (DLS), cryo-electron microscopy, flow cytometry and RT-qPCR. Based on the obtained results, we have developed practical recommendations that may help researchers to make the best choice of the EV isolation method.

About the authors

T. A. Shtam

Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute of National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute; Oncosystem Ltd.; Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology; Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University

Author for correspondence.
Email: tatyana_shtam@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Gatchina, 188300; Skolkovo, 143026; St. Petersburg, 197758; St. Petersburg, 195251

R. B. Samsonov

Oncosystem Ltd.; Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: tatyana_shtam@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Skolkovo, 143026; St. Petersburg, 197758

A. V. Volnitskiy

Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute of National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute

Email: tatyana_shtam@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Gatchina, 188300

R. A. Kamyshinsky

National Research Center Kurchatov Institute

Email: tatyana_shtam@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 123182

N. A. Verlov

Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute of National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute

Email: tatyana_shtam@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Gatchina, 188300

M. S. Kniazeva

Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University

Email: tatyana_shtam@mail.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 195251

E. A. Korobkina

Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University

Email: tatyana_shtam@mail.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 195251

A. S. Orehov

National Research Center Kurchatov Institute

Email: tatyana_shtam@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 123182

A. L. Vasiliev

National Research Center Kurchatov Institute

Email: tatyana_shtam@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 123182

A. L. Konevega

Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute of National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute; Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University

Email: tatyana_shtam@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Gatchina, 188300; St. Petersburg, 195251

A. V. Malek

Oncosystem Ltd.; Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: tatyana_shtam@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Skolkovo, 143026; St. Petersburg, 197758

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2018 Pleiades Publishing, Ltd.