Functional linkage between the transport characteristics of the MDCK1 cell monolayer and their actin cytoskeleton organization
- Authors: Gorshkov A.N.1,2, Zaitseva M.R.1,3, Snigirevskaya E.S.1, Komissarchik Y.Y.1,3
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Institute of Influenza, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
- St. Petersburg State University
- Issue: Vol 10, No 2 (2016)
- Pages: 133-144
- Section: Article
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1990-519X/article/view/212059
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990519X1602005X
- ID: 212059
Cite item
Abstract
The dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton spatial organization and transepithelial electric resistance (TEER) in the MDCK1 cell monolayer exposed to arginine–vasopressin (AVP) and forskolin, a protein kinase A (PKA) activator, have been studied. These physiologically active substances are shown to depolymerize filamentous actin in MDCK1 cells (in both the apical and basal cytoplasm) and, concurrently, to considerably decrease the TEER of the cell monolayer. A decrease in TEER suggests an increase in the ion current through the cell monolayer. Correspondingly, the created ion gradient stimulates AVP-sensitive water flow. To clarify the routes of ions and water in MDCK monolayer, the localization of claudin-1 and -2 in tight junctions of ATCC (American Type Culture Collection) MDCK (a low TEER) and MDCK1 (a high TEER) cells was studied by immunofluorescence assay. Claudin-1 and -2 are detectable in the tight junctions of ATCC MDCK cells; however, the tight junctions of MDCK1 cells contain only claudin-1, whereas poreforming claudin-2 is absent. The exposure of MDCK1 cells to forskolin fails to change the distribution of the studied claudins, thereby suggesting that a decrease in TEER caused by forskolin is associated with a change in transcellular, rather than paracellular, permeability of the monolayer
About the authors
A. N. Gorshkov
Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute of Influenza, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: angorsh@yahoo.com
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 194064; St. Petersburg, 197376
M. R. Zaitseva
Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences; St. Petersburg State University
Email: angorsh@yahoo.com
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 194064; St. Petersburg, 199034
E. S. Snigirevskaya
Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: angorsh@yahoo.com
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 194064
Ya. Yu. Komissarchik
Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences; St. Petersburg State University
Email: angorsh@yahoo.com
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 194064; St. Petersburg, 199034
Supplementary files
