Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective study
- Authors: Lyadova M.A.1,2, Fedorinov D.S.1,3, Nersesova T.A.1, Gridneva Y.V.1,4,5, Volkova M.I.1,3, Lyadov K.V.6,7, Kuzmina E.S.1, Antonova T.G.1, Pokataev I.A.1, Galkin V.N.1, Poddubnaya I.V.3
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Moscow City Hospital named after S.S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department"
- Novokuznetsk State Institute for Postgraduate Medical Education – branch of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
- 5Moscow Center for Rehabilitation Treatment
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
- Moscow Center for Rehabilitation Treatment
- Issue: Vol 27, No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 36-41
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1815-1434/article/view/291146
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.26442/18151434.2025.1.203025
- ID: 291146
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the Russian patient population.
Materials and methods. This retrospective study included 231 patients (157 males and 74 females) aged 44 to 86 years (median 64.56±8.09) who underwent examination and treatment at Moscow City Hospital named after S.S. Yudin and Moscow Center for Rehabilitation Treatment.
Results. The median follow-up was 16.6 months (13.38-18.61). The effectiveness of therapy was evaluated in all patients included in the study. Objective response (complete regression + partial regression) was achieved in 45 (19.5%) patients. Disease control (objective response + stabilization) was reported in 186 (80.5%) subjects. Median of overall survival in patients with metastatic RCC was 15.62 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.89-17.75): in the 1st line group, 13.18 months (95% CI 11.21-17.75), and in the 2nd and subsequent lines group, 16.72 months (95% CI 13.41-20.19). Grade 1-2 immune-mediated adverse events were reported in 81.8% (n=189) of patients, of which 97 (78.9%) received 1st line immunotherapy and 92 (85.2%) received 2nd and subsequent lines.
Conclusion. RCC immunotherapy in the Russian population is associated with high rates of objective response and disease control in the first line of treatment (19.5 and 80.5%, respectively). This treatment method is typically associated with a small number of grade 3-4 immune-mediated adverse events (3.03% according to our data), which indicates an acceptable safety profile and is comparable with the data from foreign studies.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Marina A. Lyadova
Moscow State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Moscow City Hospital named after S.S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department"; Novokuznetsk State Institute for Postgraduate Medical Education – branch of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Email: dr.nersesova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9558-5579
SPIN-code: 8220-2854
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Moscow; NovokuznetskDenis S. Fedorinov
Moscow State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Moscow City Hospital named after S.S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department"; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Email: dr.nersesova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5516-7367
SPIN-code: 1079-8460
Oncologist
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowTatiana A. Nersesova
Moscow State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Moscow City Hospital named after S.S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department"
Author for correspondence.
Email: dr.nersesova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7853-0349
Oncologist
Russian Federation, MoscowYana V. Gridneva
Moscow State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Moscow City Hospital named after S.S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department"; Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia; 5Moscow Center for Rehabilitation Treatment
Email: dr.nersesova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9015-2002
SPIN-code: 4189-6387
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowMaria I. Volkova
Moscow State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Moscow City Hospital named after S.S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department"; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Email: dr.nersesova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7754-6624
D. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowKonstantin V. Lyadov
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); Moscow Center for Rehabilitation Treatment
Email: dr.nersesova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5468-5074
D. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Acad. RAS
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowEvgeniya S. Kuzmina
Moscow State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Moscow City Hospital named after S.S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department"
Email: dr.nersesova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-2856-5176
SPIN-code: 9668-5733
oncologist
Russian Federation, MoscowTatyana G. Antonova
Moscow State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Moscow City Hospital named after S.S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department"
Email: dr.nersesova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-6646-7454
oncologist
Russian Federation, MoscowIlya A. Pokataev
Moscow State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Moscow City Hospital named after S.S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department"
Email: dr.nersesova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9864-3837
SPIN-code: 7338-9428
D. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, MoscowVsevolod N. Galkin
Moscow State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Moscow City Hospital named after S.S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department"
Email: vsgalkin@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6619-6179
D. Sci. (Med.), Prof.
Russian Federation, MoscowIrina V. Poddubnaya
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Email: dr.nersesova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0995-1801
D. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Acad. RAS
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network; Linehan WM, Spellman PT, Ricketts CJ, et al. Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Papillary Renal-Cell Carcinoma. New Engl J Med. 2016;374(2):135-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505917
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708
- Fay AP, McKay RR, Lin X, et al. Impact of Geographic Regions on Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From an International Clinical Trials Database. J Glob Oncol. 2018;4:1-14. doi: 10.1200/JGO.17.00119z
- Zhuang TZ, Case K, Olsen TA, et al. Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Therapies and Ongoing Trials. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(12):2867. doi: 10.3390/cancers14122867
- Padala SA, Barsouk A, Thandra KC, et al. Epidemiology of Renal Cell Carcinoma. World J Oncol. 2020;11(3):79-87. doi: 10.14740/wjon1279
- Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2022 году (заболеваемость и смертность). Под ред. А.Д. Каприна, В.В. Старинского, А.О. Шахзадовой. М.: МНИОИ им. ПА. Герцена – филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2023 [Zlokachestvennyie novoobrazovaniia v Rossii v 2022 godu (zabolevaiemost i smertnost). Pod red. AD Kaprina, VV Starinskogo, AO Shakhzadovoi. Moscow: MNIOI im. PA. Gertsena – filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2023 (in Russian)].
- Nakano O, Sato M, Naito Y, et al. Proliferative activity of intratumoral CD8(+) T-lymphocytes as a prognostic factor in human renal cell carcinoma: clinicopathologic demonstration of antitumor immunity. Cancer Res. 2001;61(13):5132-6.
- Sharpe AH, Pauken KE. The diverse functions of the PD1 inhibitory pathway. Nature reviews. Immunology. 2018;18(3):153-67. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.108
- Postow MA, Callahan MK, Wolchok JD. Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Cancer Therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(17):1974-82. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4358
- Topalian S, Hodi FS, Brahmer JR, et al. Five-Year Survival and Correlates Among Patients With Advanced Melanoma, Renal Cell Carcinoma, or Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Nivolumab. AMA Oncol. 2019;5(10):1411-20. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2187
- McDermott DF, Motzer RJ, Atkins MB, et al. Longterm overall survival with nivolumab in previously treated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) from phase I and II studies. Abstract (4507) presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology; June 3–7, 2016; Chicago, IL.
- Motzer RJ, Escudier B, George S,et al. Nivolumab versus everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: Updated results with long-term follow-up of the randomized, open-label, phase 3 CheckMate 025 trial. Cancer. 2020;126(18):4156-67. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33033
- Motzer RJ, McDermott DF, Escudier B, et al. Conditional survival and long-term efficacy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2022;128(11):2085-97. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34180
- Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF, et al. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(14):1277-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1712126
- Albiges L, Tannir NM, Burotto M, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended 4-year follow-up of the phase III CheckMate 214 trial. ESMO Open. 2020;5(6):e001079. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-001079
- Flippot R, Dalban C, Laguerre B, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab in Brain Metastases From Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results of the GETUG-AFU 26 NIVOREN Multicenter Phase II Study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(23):2008-16. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02218
- Emamekhoo H, Olsen MR, Carthon BC, et al. Safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with brain metastases: CheckMate 920. Cancer. 2022;128(5):966-74. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34016
- Atkins MB, Plimack ER, Puzanov I, et al. Axitinib in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced renal cell cancer: a non-randomised, open-label, dose-finding, and dose-expansion phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(3):405-15. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30081-0
- Rini BI, Plimack ER, Stus V, et al. Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(12):1116-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816714
- Powles T, Plimack ER, Soulières D, et al. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib monotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-426): extended follow-up from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(12):1563-73. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30436-8
- P Phase II trial of lenvatinib (LEN) + pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) for progressive disease after PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in metastatic clear cell (mcc) renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Results by independent imaging review and subgroup analyses. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(4):S558-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.782
- Postow MA, Sidlow R, Hellmann MD. Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated with Immune Checkpoint Blockade. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(2):158-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1703481
- Abou Alaiwi S, Xie W, Nassar AH, et al. Safety and efficacy of restarting immune checkpoint inhibitors after clinically significant immune-related adverse events in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(1):e000144. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000144
- Ornstein MC, Garcia JA. Toxicity of Checkpoint Inhibition in Advanced RCC: A Systematic Review. Kidney Cancer. 2017;1(2):133-41. doi: 10.3233/KCA-170017
- Das S, Johnson DB. Immune-related adverse events and anti-tumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0805-8
Supplementary files
