Multimodal approach to the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a malignancy of the liver associated with poor prognosis. The understanding of the prevalence of liver damage and functional status of the liver can complicate therapy in these patients and often requires non-standard treatment approach. In this context, the study of the results of radical liver resection, locoregional and systemic therapy for HCC remains of current interest. Materials and methods. We analyzed the experience in the treatment of HCC in 70 patients, who were treated between 1991 and 2015. We studied the main demographic characteristics, local prevalence and liver status at the beginning of therapy, the application of therapeutic methods, intraoperative data, postmanipulation complications, overall and recurrence-free survival. The paper presents the following treatment options: liver resection (n=27), transarterial chemoembolization - TACE (n=16), radiofrequency ablation - RFA (n=3) and systemic therapy (n=4), TACE + transplantation (n=6), TACE + resection (n=3), TACE + sorafenib (n=3), resection + sorafenib (n=1), resection + RFA + sorafenib (n=2), transarterial embolization + resection (n=1), resection + RFA (n=1), TACE + resection + sorafenib (n=1), RFA + TACE (n=1), transarterial embolization + sorafenib (n=1). Results. Median overall survival (OS) was 33 months in the liver resection group, 5-year survival rate was 49%, and median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 9 month, 1-year RFS rate - 40%. Median survival of patients who underwent TACE in mono-regimen (n=16) was 9 months; 1-year survival rate was 44%, the disease relapse after radical treatment, included resection and RFA (n=40) was noted in 25 (59.5%) patients. Median RFS was 9 months in this group. OS was significantly lower in group of patients with relapse of HCC in comparison with the group without recurrences (p=0.004). Conclusions. Although we see recent advances of interventional and drug therapy in patients with HCC, surgical treatment remains a priority. Liver resection allows radically remove malignant lesion and achieve the most satisfactory results, nowadays. The combined approach is a promising direction and the studying of the efficacy of combined treatment protocols and the development of new options will help us to improve the prognosis of treatment of HCC severe categories patients.

About the authors

O G Skipenko

Russian scientific center of surgery named after academician B.V.Petrovsky

Email: oskripenko@mail.ru
д-р мед. наук, проф. ФГБНУ РНЦХ им. акад. Б.В.Петровского 119991, Russian Federation, Moscow, GSP-1, Abrikosovskii per., d. 2

D A Chekunov

Russian scientific center of surgery named after academician B.V.Petrovsky

хирург ФГБНУ РНЦХ им. акад. Б.В.Петровского 119991, Russian Federation, Moscow, GSP-1, Abrikosovskii per., d. 2

G A Shatverian

Russian scientific center of surgery named after academician B.V.Petrovsky

д-р мед. наук, ФГБНУ РНЦХ им. акад. Б.В.Петровского 119991, Russian Federation, Moscow, GSP-1, Abrikosovskii per., d. 2

N N Bagmet

Russian scientific center of surgery named after academician B.V.Petrovsky

канд. мед. наук, ФГБНУ РНЦХ им. акад. Б.В.Петровского 119991, Russian Federation, Moscow, GSP-1, Abrikosovskii per., d. 2

M I Sekacheva

Russian scientific center of surgery named after academician B.V.Petrovsky

канд. мед. наук, ФГБНУ РНЦХ им. акад. Б.В.Петровского 119991, Russian Federation, Moscow, GSP-1, Abrikosovskii per., d. 2

R S Polyakov

Russian scientific center of surgery named after academician B.V.Petrovsky

канд. мед. наук, ФГБНУ РНЦХ им. акад. Б.В.Петровского 119991, Russian Federation, Moscow, GSP-1, Abrikosovskii per., d. 2

A L Bedzhanyan

Russian scientific center of surgery named after academician B.V.Petrovsky

канд. мед. наук, ФГБНУ РНЦХ им. акад. Б.В.Петровского 119991, Russian Federation, Moscow, GSP-1, Abrikosovskii per., d. 2

A G Abdullaev

I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

д-р мед. наук, проф. ГБОУ ВПО Первый МГМУ им. И.М.Сеченова 119991, Russian Federation, Moscow, ul. Trubetskaia, d. 8, str. 2

Ya G Moysyuk

Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after academician V.I. Shumakov

д-р мед. наук, проф. ФГБУ ФНЦТИО им. акад. В.И.Шумакова 123182, Russian Federation, Moscow, Shchukinskaia ul., d. 1

References

  1. Lafaro K.J, Demirjian A.N, Pawlik T.M. Epidemiology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2015; 24 (1): 1-17.
  2. Llovet J.M, Ducreux M, Lencioniet R et al. EASL-EORTC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2012; 56: j908-43.
  3. Вишневский В.А., Кубышкин В.А., Чжао А.В. Операции на печени. Руководство для хирургов. М.: Миклош, 2003; с. 50-6.
  4. Brunello F, Veltri A, Carucci P et al. Radiofrequency ablation versus ethanol injection for early hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized controlled trial. Scand J Gastroenterol 2008; 43 (6): 727-35.
  5. Lin S.M, Lin C.J, Lin C.C et al. Randomised controlled trial comparing percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, and percutaneous acetic acid injection to treat hepatocellular carcinoma of 3 cm or less. Gut 2005; 54 (8): 1151-6.
  6. Cheng A.L, Kang Y.K, Chen Z et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double - blind, placebo - controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10 (1): 25-34.
  7. Llovet J.M, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V et al. SHARP Investigators Study Group. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2008; 359 (4): 378-90.

Copyright (c) 2015 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies