Patient resource to improve the effectiveness of oncological care for the population

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background. Improving oncological care for the population is defined as one of the main priorities for the development of domestic health care, which is determined by the high medical and social significance of malignant neoplasms. The problem of improving cancer care is multidimensional. However, there are not enough scientific papers that consider the patient's resource as a factor in achieving a greater level of effectiveness of cancer care.

Aim. To assess the state and possibilities for improving the patient's resource of cancer care.

Materials and methods. The study was conducted at the Ivanovo Regional Oncology Center, Ivanovo in the period 2020-2022 on the basis of a comprehensive program using traditional methods: sociological, expert assessment, analytical, documentary. The assessment of the patient's resource of oncological care was carried out according to the original methodology, which included 10 parameters. A survey of 1000 oncological patients at different stages of diagnosis and treatment of malignant neoplasms was carried out and its results were analyzed, taking into account the factors of the staging of the oncological process, medical and demographic characteristics of patients. The assessment of the quality of life of patients was carried out using the SF12 (12Item ShortForm Health Survey) questionnaire. Based on the examination data of 410 cases of the provision of oncological medical services by experts of medical insurance companies, according to regulatory medical, economic and clinical criteria, as well as an assessment of patient satisfaction with the care provided, all cases are divided into 2 groups with an optimal and non-optimal level of care effectiveness. Statistical data processing was carried out on the basis of electronic databases using applied computer programs and provided for the calculation of relative values, the reliability of the difference in indicators, and the Spearman correlation coefficient.

Results. Data were obtained on the decrease in the patient resource of oncological care for all its selected components and its established relationship with the effectiveness of care, which requires the improvement of medical and organizational technology for working with oncological patients. A medical and organizational technology for providing assistance to oncological patients in the conditions of passing through the stages of the treatment and diagnostic process is proposed.

Conclusion. An integral assessment of the 10 components of the patient resource at the stages of clinical observation of patients in an oncological dispensary makes it possible to monitor the main factors on the part of the patient that determine the effectiveness of care, as well as to carry out planned measures to correct adverse and strengthen favorable factors. The proposed approach is the basis for making management decisions.

About the authors

Vladimir A. Kozlov

Ivanovo Regional Oncology Center

Email: ivood-va@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3735-0728
SPIN-code: 4805-4551

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Ivanovo

Iurii V. Samsonov

National Medical Research Radiological Centre; Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre

Email: samsonovu@list.ru

Cand. Sci. (Med.), National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Dmitrii L. Mushnikov

Ivanovo State Medical Academy

Author for correspondence.
Email: 89158113918@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4175-7969
SPIN-code: 7180-1923

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, Ivanovo

References

  1. Муханова К.Ю., Шелемех В.В. Уважение автономии пациента как основа сотрудничества врача и пациента. Вестник научных конференций. 2020;5-3(57):76-7 [Mukhanova KYu, Shelemekh VV. Respect for the autonomy of the patient as the basis for cooperation between the doctor and the patient. Bulletin of Scientific Conferences. 2020;5-3(57):76-7 (in Russian)].
  2. Белевский А.С. Взгляд на пациента с точки зрения пациента: исследование inspire. Consilium Medicum. 2007;9(3):40-4 [Belevsky AS. A look at the patient from the patient's point of view: an inspire study. Consilium Medicum. 2007;9(3):40-4 (in Russian)].
  3. Козлов В.А., Поляков Б.А., Мушников Д.Л. Принципы изучения, оценки, формирования и развития политики здравоохранения в части онкологической помощи населению на региональном уровне. Иваново, 2017 [Kozlov VA, Poliakov BA, Mushnikov DL. Printsipy izucheniia, otsenki, formirovaniia i razvitiia politiki zdravookhraneniia v chasti onkologicheskoi pomoshchi naseleniiu na regional'nom urovne. Ivanovo, 2017 (in Russian)].
  4. Ривкина Н. Эффективная коммуникация с пациентом в паллиативной помощи: как сообщить пациенту о переходе к паллиативному лечению. Московская медицина. 2016;6(15):32-4 [Rivkina N. Effective communication with the patient in palliative care: how to inform the patient about the transition to palliative treatment. Moscow Medicine. 2016;6(15):32-4 (in Russian)].
  5. Кожевникова Т.Н., Гривас И.С. Психологические аспекты тяжелобольного пациента: взгляд пациента. Церковь и медицина. 2022;2(22):87-94 [Kozhevnikova TN, Grivas IS. Psychological aspects of a seriously ill patient: a patient's view. Church and Medicine. 2022;2(22):87-94 (in Russian)].
  6. Куйдо К.В., Осипов Ф.М. Психологические этапы адаптации пациентов с угрожающими жизни заболеваниями и рекомендации в решении психологических проблем пациентов. Труды международного симпозиума «Надежность и качество». 2021;2:320-2 [Kuido KV, Osipov FM. Psychological stages of adaptation of patients with life-threatening diseases and recommendations in solving psychological problems of patients. Proceedings of the international symposium “Reliability and quality”. 2021;2:320-2 (in Russian)].
  7. Алексеева Г.Н., Кику П.Ф., Измайлова О.А., и др. Модель организации онкологической помощи населению региона. Здравоохранение Российской Федерации. 2017;61(6):284-91 [Alekseeva GN, Kiku PF, Izmailov OA, et al. Model of oncology aid rendered to population of the region. Health of the Russian Federation. 2017;61(6):284-91 (in Russian)].
  8. Runciman WB, Edmonds MJ, Pradhan M. Setting priorities for patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care. 2012;11:224-9.
  9. Sheikh A, Panesar SS, Larizgoitia I, et al. Safer primary care for all: a global imperative. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1:l82-3.
  10. Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M. Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ. 2011;322:517-9.
  11. Wachter RM, Pronovost P, Shekelle P. Strategies to improve patient safety: the evidence base matures. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(5):350-2.
  12. Woloshynowych M, Rogers S, Taylor-Adams S, Vincent C. The investigation and analysis of critical incidents and adverse events in healthcare. Health Technol Assess. 2015;9(19):110-43.

Copyright (c) 2023 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies