Email this article Dynamics of the state of supporting implants of covering and fixed prostheses in the complete absence of teeth
- Authors: Zaslavsky R.S.1, Olesov E.E.2, Ragulin A.V.2, Romanov A.S.1, Ivanov A.S.1, Movsesyan V.G.2
-
Affiliations:
- Medical and Biological University of Innovations and Continuing Education named after A.I. Burnazyan
- Academy of Postgraduate Education
- Issue: Vol 26, No 1 (2022)
- Pages: 25-30
- Section: Clinical Investigation
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1728-2802/article/view/110720
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/1728-2802-2022-26-1-25-30
- ID: 110720
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The functional duration of implant prostheses in the complete absence of teeth is insufficiently represented in the special literature. Hence, the experience of using such prostheses of various designs over 20 years is summarized.
AIM: To analyze the effectiveness of implant prostheses in the complete absence of teeth in terms of peri-implant tissue status
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study examined 23 patients with fixed dentures on 4 implants after 5 years and 30 patients with fixed dentures on 6 implants after 10 years from the manufacture date. Overdentures on 4 implants with rigid attachments were analyzed in 24 patients after 10 years and with elastic attachments in 28 patients after 20 years. Additionally, 20 years ago, 73 patients received overdentures with bar fixation on 2 implants. The evaluation criteria include the detection of mucositis, peri-implantitis with 1/3 and 1/2 bone resorption, and implant removal.
RESULTS: When summarizing the state of implants over 20 years, the following results were obtained: removable dentures are more effective with rigid attachments on a bar and 4 implants and less effective on 2 implants (47.9% and 65.2% of implant removals, respectively); fixed prostheses with complete absence of teeth (experience of 10 years of use) are preferred with support for 6 implants (28.3% of removals vs. 42.4% with support for 4 implants).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the proportion of removed implants is >50% of the installed ones. The functional average period of fixed prostheses on 6 implants in the absence of teeth is 10 years (on 4 implants is 5 years) and removable prostheses on 2–4 implants with elastic and rigid attachments is 5 years.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Roman S. Zaslavsky
Medical and Biological University of Innovations and Continuing Education named after A.I. Burnazyan
Email: mbufmbc@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2217-8745
MD, Assistant
Russian Federation, MoscowEgor E. Olesov
Academy of Postgraduate Education
Author for correspondence.
Email: olesov_georgiy@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9165-2554
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowArseniy V. Ragulin
Academy of Postgraduate Education
Email: senya12_95@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0799-4688
Post-Graduate Student
Russian Federation, MoscowAleksey S. Romanov
Medical and Biological University of Innovations and Continuing Education named after A.I. Burnazyan
Email: docromanoff@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4414-0270
Post-Graduate Student
Russian Federation, MoscowAlexander S. Ivanov
Medical and Biological University of Innovations and Continuing Education named after A.I. Burnazyan
Email: stom5@rostgmu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4397-859X
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowVagarshak G. Movsesyan
Academy of Postgraduate Education
Email: vanya.movsesyan@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6218-5387
Post-Graduate Student
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Put VA, Solodkiy VG, Morozov PV, et al. Nine years of experience in social social events on dental implantation. Russian bulletin of dental implantology 2019;(3–4):75–81. (In Russ).
- Zaslavskiy RS, Olesova VN, Shmatov KV, et al. The structure of clinical indications and prosthetic techniques applied in practical implantology. Stomatologiya dlya vsekh. 2018;(3):30–33. (In Russ).
- French D, Kokran D, Ofek R. Retrospektivnoe kogortnoe issledovanie 4591 implantata sistemy Straumann, ustanovlennykh u 2060 patsientov v chastnoi praktike, s nablyudeniem do 10 let: vzaimosvyaz’ urovnya kosti al’veolyarnogo grebnya i sostoyaniya myagkikh tkanei. Perio iQ. 2017;(28):22–42. (In Russ).
- Sakaeva ZU, Zaslavskiy RS, Remizova AA, et al. Сlinical and microbiological justification of the periodicity of professional oral hygiene during implant treatment. Russian Bulletin of Dental Implantology. 2020;(3–4):79–83. (In Russ).
- Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, Stefanini M, et al. Classification of facial peri implant soft tissue dehiscence/deficiencies at single implant sites in the esthetic zone. Journal of Periodontology. 2019;90(10):1116–1124. doi: 10.1002/jper.18-0616
- Shi JY, Xu FY, Zhuang LF, et al. Long-term outcomes of narrow diameter implants in posterior jaws: A retrospective study with at least 8-year follow-up. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2018;29(1):76–81. doi: 10.1111/clr.13046
- Ma M, Qi M, Zhang D, Liu H. The Clinical Performance of Narrow Diameter Implants Versus Regular Diameter Implants: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2019;45(6):503–508. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00025
- Long L, Alqarni H, Masri R. Influence of implant abutment fabrication method on clinical outcomes: a systematic review. European Journal of Oral Implantology. 2017;10(1):67–77.
- Heitz-Mayfield LJA, Salvi GE. Peri-implant mucositis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2018;45(Suppl. 20)S237–S245. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12953
- Tsitsiashvili AM, Panin AM, Volosova EV. The success of treatment and survival of dental implants in different approaches to the treatment of patients using dental implants in conditions of limited bone volume. Russian dental journal. 2020;24(1):32–38. (In Russ). doi: 10.18821/1728-2802-2020-24-1-32-38
- Bulycheva EA, Trezubov VV. Predvaritel’noe zubnoe protezirovanie. Rukovodstvo dlya vrachei-stomatologov. Saint Petersburg: Chelovek; 2019. (In Russ).
- Trezubov VN, Arutyunov SD, editors. Klinicheskaya stomatologiya. Gospital’nyi kurs. Moscow: Practical medicine; 2020. (In Russ).
- Kulakov AA, editor. Khirurgicheskaya stomatologiya i chelyustno-litsevaya khirurgiya. Natsional’noe rukovodstvo. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2015. (In Russ).
- Kulakov AA, editor. Dental’naya implantatsiya. Natsional’noe rukovodstvo. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2018. (In Russ).
- Lebedenko IYu, Arutyunov SD, Ryakhovskiy AN, editors. Ortopedicheskaya stomatologiya. Natsional’noe rukovodstvo. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2016. (In Russ).
