Comparative assessment of composites landing adaptation for dental restoration in experiments

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background. In modern dental practice, there is a problem of complications after treatment of caries, such as the postoperative sensitivity of the tooth, formation of secondary caries, and caries complications in the form of pulpitis or periodontitis of the tooth. In addition, this problem exists despite the achievements in the production of high-quality composite filling materials, which are very popular among dentists worldwide. One of the problems that lead to complications after caries treatment is a violation of the integrity of the adhesive bond between the composite and the tooth tissue, which is manifested by a violation of the seal of restoration and the formation of a gap between the filling material and the tooth tissues. This in turn leads to the development of tooth sensitivity and the possibility of bacterial invasion between the filling material and the walls of the tooth, followed by the progression of the pathological process. In the scientific literature, there is evidence of the positive effect of preheating and vibration on the composite before its polymerization.

Aim. Additionally, the purpose of this study is to determine the effect of physical impact, such as heating and vibration, on the composite using ultrasound in order to improve the quality of the adhesive fixation of the composite filling material to the walls of the tooth.

Materials and methods. The study was conducted on the extracted teeth of patients. Based on this, we have proposed a method for the simultaneous thermo-vibration action on a non-polymerized composite directly in the formed tooth cavity to improve the physicochemical, including the adhesive, properties of light-curing composites.

Results of the study revealed a statistically significant positive effect of thermo-vibration on the composite, not only in comparison with the classical method of working with the composite at room temperature, but also with the method of preheating the composite in a furnace used for heating the composite.

About the authors

A. A. Gushchin

Kuban State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: doctor-stomatolog@yandex.ru

Graduate student

Russian Federation, 4, Mitrofan Sedina Street, Krasnodar, 350063

A. A. Adamchik

Kuban State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: doctor-stomatolog@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, 4, Mitrofan Sedina Street, Krasnodar, 350063

References

  1. Christensen G. Should resin-based composite dominate restorative dentistry today? J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141(12):1490–1493. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0112.
  2. Sevbitov AV, Danshina SD, Kuznetsova MU, et al. Icon as a method of choice for a non-injection method for the treatment of initial caries in patients with ossifying progressive fibrodysplasia: a case study. Rossiyskii stomatologicheskii zhurnal. 2019;23(6):280–283. (in Russian). doi: 10.18821/1728-2802-2019-23-6-280-283.
  3. Shumilovich BR, Leshcheva EA, Haritonov DYu, et al. Changes in the microstructure of enamel and local under the rotary instrument in the treatment of caries (in vitro study). Rossiyskii stomatologicheskii zhurnal. 2017;21(2):68–71. (in Russian).
  4. Lucey S, Lynch C, Ray N, et al. Effect of pre-heating on the viscosity and microhardness of a resin composite. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(4):278–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02045.x.
  5. Baroudi K, Rodrigues JC. Flowable resin composites: a systematic review and clinical considerations. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(6):ZE18–ZE24. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12294.6129.
  6. Balos S, Pili B, Petronijevi B, et al. Improving mechanical properties of flowable dental composite resin by adding silica nanoparticles. Vojnosanitetski Pregled. 2013;70(5):477–483. doi: 10.2298/vsp1305477b.
  7. Muñoz CA, Bond PR, Sy-Muñoz J, et al. Effect of pre-heating on depth of cure and surface hardness of light-polymerized resin composites. Am J Dent. 2008;21(4):215–222.
  8. Yang JN, Raj JD, Sherlin H. Effects of preheated composite on micro leakage-an in-vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(6):ZC36–ZC38. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18084.7980.
  9. Daronch M, Rueggeberg FA, Hall G, De Goes MF. Effect of composite temperature on in vitro intrapulpal temperature rise. Dent Mater. 2007;23(10):1283–1288. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.024.
  10. Daronch M, Rueggeberg F, Moss L, De Goes M. Clinically relevant issues related to preheating composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006;18(6):340–350. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2006.00046.x.
  11. Patent RUS 2545410 /27.03.2015. Byul. № 9. Melikyan ML, Melikyan DM, Melikyan KM, Davydova KI. M.L. Melikyan's method for vibration mechanical activation of composites and device for implementing it. (in Russian)
  12. Gushchin АА, Adamchik АА. Methods for improving the physical, mechanical and chemical properties of composite filling materials. Medi-ko-farmatsevticheskii zhurnal Puls. 2020;22(2):36–41. (in Russian). doi: 10.26787/nydha-2686-6838-2020-22-2-36-41.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Electron microscopy of the side wall of the sample control group 1. Uv. one hundred. a - composite; b - the wall of the tooth; c - slit.

Download (89KB)
3. Fig. 2. Electron microscopy of the bottom of the sample restoration from the control group 1. Uv. one hundred. a - composite; b - the wall of the tooth; c - slit.

Download (77KB)
4. Fig. 3. Electron microscopy of the side wall of the sample from control group 1. Uv.1500. a - composite; b - the wall of the tooth; c - a slit with a size of 9.875 microns.

Download (71KB)
5. Fig. 4. Electron microscopy of the bottom of the sample restoration from the control group 1. Uv. 1500. a - composite; b - the wall of the tooth; c - a slit with a size of 7.437 microns.

Download (71KB)
6. Fig. 5. Electron microscopy of the side wall of the sample from comparison groups 2. Uv. one hundred. a - composite; b - the wall of the tooth; c - slit.

Download (77KB)
7. Fig. 6. Electron microscopy of the bottom of the sample restoration from comparison group 2. Uv. one hundred. a - composite; b - the wall of the tooth; c - slit.

Download (72KB)
8. Fig. 7. Electron microscopy of the side wall of the sample from comparison groups 2. Uv.1500. a - composite; b - the wall of the tooth; c - a 5,250 micron slit.

Download (88KB)
9. Fig. 8. Electron microscopy of the bottom of the sample restoration from comparison group 2. Uv. 1500. a - composite; b - the wall of the tooth; c - slit 6.687 μm in size.

Download (62KB)
10. Fig. 9. Electron microscopy of the side wall of the sample from main group 3. Uv. one hundred. a - composite; b - the wall of the tooth; в - connection zone.

Download (90KB)
11. Fig. 10. Electron microscopy of the bottom of the sample restoration from the main group 3. Uv. one hundred. a - composite; b - the wall of the tooth; в - connection zone.

Download (78KB)
12. Fig. 11. Electron microscopy of the side wall of the sample from the main group 3. Uv. 1500. a - composite; b - the wall of the tooth; c - connection zone (no gap).

Download (84KB)
13. Fig. 12. Electron microscopy of the bottom of the sample restoration from the main group 3. Uv. 1500. a - composite; b - the wall of the tooth; c - connection zone (no gap).

Download (94KB)

Copyright (c) 2020 Eco-Vector


 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies