Email this article The success of treatment and survival of dental implants in different approaches to the treatment of patients using dental implants in conditions of limited bone volume
- Authors: Tsitsiashvili A.M.1, Panin A.M.1, Volosova E.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 24, No 1 (2020)
- Pages: 32-38
- Section: Clinical Investigation
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1728-2802/article/view/42314
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18821/1728-2802-2020-24-1-32-38
- ID: 42314
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
The article presents the results of the analysis of the success of treatment and survival of dental implants in the treatment of patients with bone deficiency in the framework of multi-stage and single-stage approaches for bone grafting operations using standard-sized dental implants and in the framework of the approach using narrow/short dental implants without bone augmentation surgery. Based on the results obtained, the degree of expediency (p<0.05) of choosing an approach to treatment can be selected depending on the type, location of the defect and the number of missing teeth.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
A. M. Tsitsiashvili
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: amc777@yandex.ru
candidate medical sciences
Russian Federation, MoscowA. M. Panin
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Email: amc777@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow
E. V. Volosova
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Email: amc777@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow
References
- Esposito M, Ardebili Y, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 7: CD003815.
- Chiapasco M. Failures in jaw reconstructive surgery with autogenous onlay bone grafts for pre-implant purposes: incidence, prevention and management of complications. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. North. Am. 2011; 23(1): 1—15.
- Shi J.Y., Xu F.Y., Zhuang L.F., Gu Y.X., Qiao S.C., Lai H.C. Long-term outcomes of narrow diameter implants in posterior jaws: A retrospective study with at least 8-year follow-up. Clin. Oral Implants. 2018; 29(1): 76—81.
- Anitua E., Alkhraist M.H., Piñas L., Begoña L., Orive G. Implant survival and crestal bone loss around extra-short implants supporting a fixed den-ture: the effect of crown height space, crown-to-implant ratio, and offset placement of the prosthesis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2014; 29: 682—9.
- Салеева Г.Т. Результаты корреляционного анализа различных методов аугментации альвеолярных отделов челюстей. Российский вестник дентальной имплантологии. 2015; 1(31): 65—8.
- Romeo E., Storelli S., Casano G., Scanferla M., Botticelli D. Six-mm versus 10-mm long implants in the rehabilitation of posterior edentulous jaws: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2014; 7(4): 371—81.
- Felice P., Cannizzaro G., Barausse C., Pistilli R., Esposito M. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented posterior mandibles: a randomised controlled trial with 5-year after loading follow-up. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2014; 7(4): 359—69.
Supplementary files
