ANTIBACTERIAL PROPERTIES OF TEMPORARY FILLING MATERIALS


如何引用文章

全文:

详细

Object: assessment of the antibacterial effect of sealing materials based on epoxy resin, zinc-eugenol of cement and hydroxide of calcium. Materials and methods: Antibacterial activity was estimated by agaro-diffusive test (ADT) estimated the of microorganisms. Plates from filling materials were placed on Petri dish, the sowed with St. aureus, and a zone of a growth inhibition of microorganisms was estimated. Materials were used right after mixing, right after hardening, in 30 days after mixing. Results: Materials had the maximum antibacterial effect after hardening, minimum in 30 days after mixing. The greatest efficiency against St. aureus showed material based on zinc-oxide- eugenol cement.

作者简介

S. Tarasenko

First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the RussianFederation (Sechenov University)

119991, Moscow, Russia

L. Grigor’janc

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (PFUR)

Moscow, Russia

Ilana Gor

First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the RussianFederation (Sechenov University)

Email: ia.gor7@ya.ru
assistant Professor, Department of operative dentistry, Institute of stomatology of the First MSMU n.a. I. M. Sechenov 119991, Moscow, Russia

I. Medvedeva

Medicobiological laboratory “Intersen-plus”

Moscow, Russia

G. Pogosyan

First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the RussianFederation (Sechenov University)

119991, Moscow, Russia

参考

  1. Мозговая Л.А., Задорина И.И., Быкова Л.П., Годовалов А.П. Микрофлора корневых каналов зубов в динамике лечения хронических форм апикального периодонтита. Саратовский научно-медицинский журнал. 2013; 9(3): 447-9.
  2. Baumann M., Beer R., Arnold M., Hassell T. Endodontology. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme; 2010: 189-90.
  3. Eldeniz A., Erdemir A., Kurtoglu F., Esener T. Evaluation of pH and calcium ion release of Acroseal sealer in comparison with Apexit and Sealapex sealers. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2007; 103(3): e86-e91. https://doi/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.10.018
  4. Kapralos V., Koutroulis A., Ørstavik D., Sunde P., Rukke H. Antibacterial Activity of Endodontic Sealers against Planktonic Bacteria and Bacteria in Biofilms. J. Endod. 2018; 44(1): 149-54. https://doi/10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.023
  5. Kayaoglu G., Erten H., Alaçam T., Ørstavik D. Short-term antibacterial activity of root canal sealers towards Enterococcus faecalis. Int. Endod. J. 2005; 38(7): 483-88. https://doi/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00981.x
  6. Pawińska M., Szczurko G., Kierklo A., Sidun J. A laboratory study evaluating the pH of various modern root canal filling materials. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2017; 26(3): 387-92. https://doi/10.17219/acem/60440
  7. Nirupama D., Nainan M., Ramaswamy R., et al. In VitroEvaluation of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Four Endodontic Biomaterials againstEnterococcus faecalis,Candida albicans, and Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Biomater. 2014;2014:1-6. doi: 10.1155/2014/383756
  8. Zhou H, Shen Y, Zheng W, Li L, Zheng Y, Haapasalo M. Physical Properties of 5 Root Canal Sealers. J. Endod. 2013; 39(10): 1281-6. https://doi/10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.012

版权所有 © Eco-Vector, 2018


 


##common.cookie##