The analysis of postoperative complications with the use of modern technologies of osteosynthesis of the lower plate of four-jaw position (to the 130th anniversary of the development hausmann first plate pla stin for fixation of fragments of the lower jaw)


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Made a retrospective study of 82 medical records of patients regarding complications that developed in the post-operative period, after the holding plate osteosynthesis for fractures of the lower jaw. Were analyzed only the patients, who had severe concomitant injuries and somatic diseases. The results of the study showed that only 6 (7,3%) people identified purely technical reasons, which could cause complications. The vast majority (92,7%) of the cases the cause-and-effect relationship preslei of her fond memory quite clearly. Among the defects that can lead to complications, found the following: Pro-free location of plate plates without taking into account the location ofpower lines of osteosynthesis, the use of failure-the exact number of screws; inappropriate choice of clip (the use of mini-plates in the presence of a defect in one or even both cortical plates); the loss of stability of the screw in the bone under the influence of functional loads; damage to the drill tooth roots or the inferior alveolar canal nerve. Disocclusion developed as the inadequate matching of bone fragments, and resulting in secondary dislocation of bone fragments as a result of the vie inadequate fixation. Discussion to date the question remains about the number and location of fixed-Sattorov with the localization of fracture in the angle of the mandible. The results of the present study and the literature review show that the location of one mini-plate at the alveolar edge does not provide the necessary stability of the connection of bone fragments. On the basis of obtained results it is concluded that the likelihood of complications in the postoperative period can be substantially reduced by the introduction of the regulation of the operation of the osteosynthesis of the lower jaw, justified from the standpoint of evidence-based medicine.

About the authors

Aleksandr S. Pankratov

«I.M. Sechenov First Moscow state medical University»

Email: stomat-2008@mail.ru
Doctor of medical Sciences, Professor of the chair for hospital surgical dentistry and maxillofacial surgery GOU VPO First state medical University Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

References

  1. Singh R.K., Pal U.S., Agrawal A., Singh G. Single miniplate osteosynthesis in angle fracture Natl. J. Maxillofac. Surg. 2011; 2(1): 47-50.
  2. Winstanley R.P The management of fractures of the mandible. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1984; 22(3): 170-7.
  3. Козлов В.А. Неотложная стационарная стоматологическая помощь. Л.: Медицина; 1988.
  4. Панкратов А.С., Притыко А.Г., Коркин В.В., Озолина Н.Г. Организация неотложной медицинской помощи больным с переломами костей лицевого скелета. Рос. мед. жур. 2009; (4): 3-6.
  5. Панкратов А.С. Неотложная помощь в клинике челюстно-лицевой хирургии. Современное состояние вопроса. Вековые традиции. Новые технологии. В кн.: Материалы юбилейной научно-практической конференции ГКБ № 1 им. Н.И. Пирогова. М.; 2012: 320-32.
  6. Bui P., Demian N., Beetar P. Infection rate in mandibular angle fractures treated with a 2.0 mm 8-hole curved strut plate. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2009; 67: 804-8.
  7. Campbell A., Lin Y. Complication of rigid internal fixation. Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2009; 2(1): 41-7.
  8. Bergh B., Heymans M.W., Duvekot F., Forouzanfar T. Treatment and complications of mandibular fractures: a10-year analysis. J. CranioMaxillofac. Surg. 2012; 10(4):108-11.
  9. Feller K.U., Schneider M., Hlawitschka M. et al. Analysis of complications in fractures of the mandibular angle - a study with finite element computation and evaluation of data of 277 patients. J. CranioMaxillofac. Surg. 2003; 31(5): 290-5.
  10. Haug R.H., Serafin B.L. Mandibular angle fractures: A Clinical and Biomechanical comparison - the works of Ellis and Haug. Craniomaxillofac. Trauma. Reconstr. 2008; 1(1): 31-8.
  11. Champy M., Loddé J.P., Schmitt R., Jaeger J.H., Muster D. Mandibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plates via a buccal approach. J. Maxillofac Surg. 1978; 6: 14-21.
  12. Kroon F.H., Mathisson M., Cordey J.R., Rahn B.A. The use of miniplates in mandibular fractures. An in vitro study. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 1991; 19: 199-204.
  13. Fox A.J., Kellman R.M. Mandibular angle fractures: Two-miniplate fixation and complications. Arch. Facial Plast. Surg. 2003; 5: 464-9.
  14. Mansuri S., Abdulkhakim A.M., Gazal G., Hussain M.A.Z. Treatment of mandibular angle fracture with a 2 mm, 3 dimensional rectangular grid compression miniplates: A prospective clinical study. J. Int. Oral Hlth. 2014; 6(5): 136-47.
  15. Righi E., Carta M., Bruzzone A.A. et al. Experimental analysis of internal rigid fixation osteosynthesis performed with titanium bone screw and plate systems. J. Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1996; 24(1): 53-7.
  16. Sauerbier S., Kuenz J., Hauptmann S., Hoogendijk C.F., Liebehenschel N., Schön R. et al. Clinical aspects of a 2.0-mm locking plate system for mandibular fracture surgery. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 2010; 38: 501-4.
  17. Singh V., Kumar I., Bhagol A. Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fracture: A prospective randomized study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2011; 40: 372-7.
  18. Клинические рекомендации (протоколы лечения). Перелом нижней челюсти [Электронный ресурс]. Официальный сайт Стоматологической Ассоциации России (утвержден 2016. 19 апреля). URL: http://www.e-stomatology.ru/ director/protocols/protocol_perelom.php. (дата обращения 10 июня 2016).

Copyright (c) 2016 Eco-Vector


 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies