Email this article Assessment of the quality of life of patients with abfraction tooth defects
- Authors: Shashmurina A.B.1, Nikolaev A.I.1, Shashmurina V.R.1, Leshcheva E.A.2
-
Affiliations:
- Smolensk State Medical University
- Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko
- Issue: Vol 27, No 3 (2023)
- Pages: 183-192
- Section: Clinical Investigation
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1728-2802/article/view/131232
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/dent356768
- ID: 131232
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The evaluation of the effectiveness of treatment of abfraction defects with respect to patients’ quality of life is relevant.
AIM: To analyze the results of the treatment of abfraction defects according to quality of life.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire survey of 158 people aged 30–49 years was conducted. Group 1 (n=34) received the modified adhesive protocol (glutaraldehyde and an adaptive layer of flowable composite) as muscle relaxant mouthguard; group 2 (n=36), modified adhesive protocol, not used a muscle relaxant mouthguard; group 3 (n=31), basic adhesive protocol as muscle relaxant kappa; group 4 (n=27), basic adhesive protocol, did not use a muscle relaxant mouthguard; and group 5 (n=30), patients with intact teeth. The quality of life was assessed before treatment and 6 months and 1 year after tooth restoration. The Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) Quality of Life Questionnaire was used.
RESULTS: A good initial level of quality of life was found in 35.2% of patients with abfraction defects and a satisfactory one in 64.8%. The average quality-of-life score of groups 1–4 was 12.9 (95%, 12.4–13.3). “Physical pain,” with a score of2.73 (95%, 2.63–2.84), made the greatest contribution to the quality of life. Twelve months after treatment, groups 1–4 had a significant average decrease in OHIP-14 by 7.7%. The OHIP-14 score on the “physical pain” scale decreased in group 1 by 28.8%, group 2 by 25.2%, group 3 by 17.5%, and group 4 by 13.2%.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical manifestations of the abfraction defects of teeth significantly affect the quality of life of patients, particularly on “physical pain” and “physical discomfort.” The best dynamics of the quality of life was registered in patients who received the modified adhesive protocol and a muscle relaxant mouthguard.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Anna B. Shashmurina
Smolensk State Medical University
Email: shashmurina.ifivehbyf2011@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9705-1423
SPIN-code: 5121-4415
Assistant Lecturer
Russian Federation, SmolenskAlexander I. Nikolaev
Smolensk State Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: anicolaev@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1378-6538
SPIN-code: 2687-8206
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor
Russian Federation, SmolenskVictoria R. Shashmurina
Smolensk State Medical University
Email: shahmurina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5216-7521
SPIN-code: 4199-4204
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor
Russian Federation, SmolenskElena A. Leshcheva
Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko
Email: el.leshewa@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6290-6551
SPIN-code: 1068-1617
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor
Russian Federation, VoronezhReferences
- Albar NH. Efficacy of GLUMA for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity compared to lasers: A systematic review. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022;23(10):1057–1065. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3420
- Olaru AR, Popescu MR, Dragomir LP, Rauten AM. Clinical study on abfraction lesions in occlusal dysfunction. Curr Health Sci J. 2019;45(4):390–397. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.45.04.07
- Kulakov AA, Klimashin YuI, Andreeva SN, Rudenko KN. Voprosy kachestva zhizni v ortopedicheskoi stomatologii. Stomatologiya dlya vsekh. 2006;(3):4–5. (In Russ).
- Novik AA, Ionova TI. Rukovodstvo po issledovaniyu kachestva zhizni v meditsine. Saint Petersburg: Neva Publishing House; 2002. (In Russ).
- Sadykova OM, Zholudev SE, Elikov AV. The quality of life level as index of low balneoteraphy in patient with remowable dentures. Actual Problems in Dentistry. 2018;14(3):49–55. (In Russ). doi: 10.18481/2077-7566-2018-14-3-49-55
- Yanushevich OO, Gurevich KG, Panin AM, et al. Rukovodstvo po otsenke kachestva zhizni v stomatologii. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2021. (In Russ).
- Popov VA, Vyborova PS, Gordienko AA, et al. Oral health-related quality of life among students of the Medical University in the Russian Arctic. Human Ecology. 2020;(6):46–57. (In Russ). doi: 10.33396/1728-0869-2020-6-46-57
- Slade GD, Spenser AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health. 1994;1(11):3–11.
- Campos LA, Peltomäki T, Marôco J, Campos JADB. Use of Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) in different contexts. What is being measured? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(24):13412. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413412
- Barer GM, Gurevich KG, Smirnyagina VV, Fabrikant EG. Ispol’zovanie stomatologicheskikh izmerenii kachestva zhizni. Stomatologiya dlya vsekh. 2006;(2):4–7. (In Russ).
- Gileva OS, Libik TV, Khalilayeva EV, et al. Dental health in life quality criteria. Meditsinskii vestnik Bashkortostana. 2011;6(3):6–11. (In Russ).
- Chikunov SO, Dzalaeva FK, Utyuzh AS, et al. The quality of life of patients with symptoms of temporomandibular disorder in integrated dental orthopedic rehabilitation. Actual Problems in Dentistry. 2020;16(2):144–150. (In Russ). doi: 10.18481/2077-7566-20-16-2-144-150
Supplementary files
