Transdifferentiation of stem cells: from the cell to the body

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The phases of embryo development, starting with the formation of gametes and germlines, are considered. This study described the differences in the selection of germ and somatic cells. The formation of true germ cells is associated with the induction of bone morphogenetic protein. The zinc-finger transcription factor is the marker of the formation of true germ cells in primates. True germ cells have two types: germ cells that form endoderm and those that form an epiblast. Their differentiation is provided by the growth factor of fibroblasts due to the signaling protein FGF4, which interacts with the FGFR2 receptor in the primary endoderm. The migration of germ cells is controlled by the factors of stromal cells. The implantation of a fertilized egg is associated with the peculiarities of the differentiation of the trophectoderm and the influence of transcription factors. Since stem cell lines are isolated from non-brain tissues, their origin and development remain not fully established. In mice, the chorion is formed from a small area of trophectoderm covered with an out-of-the-mouth mesoderm on the proximal end of the egg lumen. In humans, the chorion, together with its basis—“non-embryonic mesoderm”—is the earliest appearance of tissue emanating from the primary endoderm. Modern research has confirmed the possibility of obtaining clones from the nuclei of early blastomere embryos. However, the use of cell nuclei at later stages yielded unsatisfactory results. The use of embryonic stem nuclei has produced much better results than the use of cells in the later stages of development. Therefore, whatever the source of the cores, they should be in the G0 or G1 phase, but not in G2.

About the authors

Alexander V. Moskalev

Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: alexmav195223@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3403-3850

doctor of medical sciences, professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Boris Yu. Gumilevsky

Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Email: alexmav195223@yandex.ru

doctor of medical sciences, professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Vasiliy Ya. Apcel

Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation; A.I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Email: alexmav195223@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7658-4856
SPIN-code: 4978-0785

doctor of medical sciences, professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Vasiliy N. Tsygan

Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Email: vn-t@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1199-0911
SPIN-code: 7215-6206
Scopus Author ID: 6603136317

doctor of medical sciences, professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Moskalev AV, Sboichakov VB, Rudoi AS. Obschaya immunologia s osnovami klinicheskoi immunologii. Moscow: Geotar-Mеdia; 2015. P. 351. (In Russ.).
  2. Moskalev AV, Gumilevskiy BY, Sboychakov VB. Medicinskay immunologia s voprosami immunnoy nedostatochnosti i osnovami klinicheskoy immunologii. Saint Petersburg: VMA. 2019;327. (In Russ.).
  3. Yarilin AA. Immunologia. Moscow: Geotar-Media; 2010. P. 957. (In Russ.),
  4. Kang HW, Lee SJ, Ko IK, et al. A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34(3):312–319. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3413
  5. Augui S, Nora EP, Heard E. Regulation of X-chromosome inactivation by the X-inactivation centre. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(6):429–442. doi: 10.1038/nrg2987
  6. Hilton IB, D’Ippolito AM, Vockley CM, et al. Epigenome editing by a CRISPR-Cas9-based acetyltransferase activates genes from promoters and enhancers. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(5):510–517. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3199
  7. Gjorevski N, Ranga A, Lutolf MP. Bioengineering approaches to guide stem cell-based organogenesis. Development. 2014;141(9):1794–804. doi: 10.1242/dev.101048
  8. Kern S, Eichler H, Stoeve J, et al. Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue. Stem Cells. 2006;24(5):1294–1301. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0342
  9. Lee JH, Kemp DM. Human adipose-derived stem cells display myogenic potential and perturbed function in hypoxic conditions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;341(3):882–888. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.038
  10. Geraghty RJ, Capes-Davis A, Davis JM, et al. Cancer Research UK. Guidelines for the use of cell lines in biomedical research. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(6):1021–1046. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.166
  11. Li B, Zeng Q, Wang H, et al. Adipose tissue stromal cells transplantation in rats of acute myocardial infarction. Coron Artery Dis. 2007;18(3):221–227. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32801235da
  12. Liu N, Zang R, Yang ST, et al. Stem cell engineering in bioreactors for large-scale bioprocessing. Engineering in Life Sciences. 2014;14(1):4–15. DOI.org/10.1002/elsc.201300013
  13. Nomikos M, Swann K, Lai FA. Starting a new life: sperm PLC-zeta mobilizes the Ca2+ signal that induces egg activation and embryo development: an essential phospholipase C with implications for male infertility. Bioessays. 2012;34(2):126–134. doi: 10.1002/bies.201100127
  14. Richardson BE, Lehmann R. Mechanisms guiding primordial germ cell migration: strategies from different organisms. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11(1):37–49. doi: 10.1038/nrm2815
  15. Rossant J, Tam PPL. New Insights into Early Human Development: Lessons for Stem Cell Derivation and Differentiation. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;20(1):18–28. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.12.004.
  16. Sasaki K, Nakamura T, Okamoto I, et al. The Germ Cell Fate of Cynomolgus Monkeys Is Specified in the Nascent Amnion. Dev Cell. 2016;39(2):169–185. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.09.007
  17. Slack JMW. The science of stem cells. Wiley; 2018. P. 248.
  18. Sternberg SH, Redding S, Jinek M., et al. DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Nature. 2014;507(7490):62–67. doi: 10.1038/nature13011
  19. Zia S, Mozafari M, Natasha G, et al. Hearts beating through decellularized scaffolds: whole-organ engineering for cardiac regeneration and transplantation. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016;36(4):705–715. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2015.1007495
  20. Abbas AK, Lichtman AN, Pillai S. Cellular and Molecular Immunology. 9th edition. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: WB. Saunders Company 2018. P. 565.
  21. McDonald JI, Celik H, Rois LE, et al. Reprogrammable CRISPR/Cas9-based system for inducing site-specific DNA methylation. Biol Open. 2016;5(6):866–874. doi: 10.1242/bio.019067
  22. Gilbert LA, Larson MH, Morsut L, et al. CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell. 2013;154(2):442–451. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.044
  23. Sasai Y. Next-generation regenerative medicine: organogenesis from stem cells in 3D culture. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12(5):520–530. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.04.009
  24. Zetsche B, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, et al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell. 2015;163(3):759–771. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038
  25. Bhaya D, Davison M, Barrangou R. CRISPR-Cas systems in bacteria and archaea: versatile small RNAs for adaptive defense and regulation. Annu Rev Genet. 2011;45:273–297. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132430
  26. Cai L, Johnstone BH, Cook TG, Liang Z, et al. Suppression of hepatocyte growth factor production impairs the ability of adipose-derived stem cells to promote ischemic tissue revascularization. Stem Cells. 2007;25(12):3234–3243. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0388
  27. Thakore PI, D’Ippolito AM, Song L, et al. Highly specific epigenome editing by CRISPR-Cas9 repressors for silencing of distal regulatory elements. Nat Methods. 2015;12(12):1143–1149. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3630
  28. Wu Y, Chen L, Scott PG, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells enhance wound healing through differentiation and angiogenesis. Stem Cells. 2007;25(10):2648–2659. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0226
  29. lson K, De Nardin E. Contemporary clinical immunology and serology. New Jersey: Upper Saddle River; 2013. 439 p.
  30. Rose NR, Mackay IR. The autoimmune diseases. 5th edition. Philadelphia; 2018. 1265 p.
  31. Zabriskie JB. Essential clinical immunology. N.Y., 2009. 362 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Route of moving PGCs in the mouse embryo to the gonads

Download (360KB)
3. Fig. 2. Fertilization in mice

Download (493KB)
4. Fig. 3. Pre-implantation development of the mouse

Download (411KB)
5. Fig. 4. Early post-implantation development of the human egg. Period of formation of amnion, extra-breathed mesoderm, secondary yolk sac, and chorion lint. The diameter of the fertilized egg is approximately 0.6 mm in 9 days, 0.8 mm in 12 days, and 2.6 mm in 16 days (unlike the mouse embryo, the human epiblast is flat)

Download (640KB)
6. Fig. 5. Formation of non-breath membranes in a fruitful human egg: а — approximately3 weeks of fertilization; b — approximately 4 weeks from fertilization

Download (314KB)

Copyright (c) 2021 Moskalev A.V., Gumilevsky B.Y., Apcel V.Y., Tsygan V.N.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies