Dynamics of endogenous interferon-alpha and -gamma production under the influence of ingaron therapy in patients with chronic epstein – barr viral infection with chronic fatigue syndrome

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The influence of antiviral therapy with ingaron on the dynamics of production of interferons α and γ and clinical effects in patients with chronic viral Epstein – Barr infection was studied. The study involved 51 patients (33 women and 17 men aged 35,27 ± 1,28 years) suffering from chronic infection caused by the Epstein – Barr virus. The duration of the disease from the appearance of the first complaints to laboratory confirmation of the Epstein – Barr virus infection and diagnosis was 2,23 ± 0,21 years. Determined the serum, spontaneous and induced production of cytokines interferons α and γ in serum and in the culture of lymphocytes. Three months after the end of antiviral therapy, in patients with an initially low level of induced interferon-γ, the production of interferon-γ increased. The absence of an increase in the production of induced interferon-γ in patients one and three months after the end of therapy with ingaron indicates the absence of the effect of the drug on the level of endogenous interferon-γ. It has been established that the initially low level of induced interferon-γ can be a marker of the positive effect of the therapy with ingaron. Correlation analysis revealed the effect of baseline interferon-γ induced on the clinical picture of the disease. Thus, initially a high level of induced interferon-γ (2706 ± 1058.94 pg/ml) inversely affects the development of sweating in patients (r = –0.506, p = 0,023; τ = –0.419, р = 0.021), and initially low level of the induced IFN-γ (287.2 ± 64.65 pg/ml) — on development of weakness (r = –0.405, р = 0.045; τ = –0.419, р = 0.037). In general, ingarone can be used in the therapy of patients with chronic Epstein virus — Bar infection at a dose of 500,000 IU every other day, at least 10 injections.

About the authors

Irina A. Rakityanskaya

City Ambulant Department № 112

Email: tat-akyla@inbox.ru

doctor of medical sciences

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Tatyana S. Ryabova

City Ambulant Department № 112; Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Email: tita74@mail.ru

doctor of medical sciences, associate professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Anastasia A. Kalashnikova

All-Russian Center for Emergency and Radiation Medicine named after A.M. Nikiforov

Email: petkova_nas@mail.ru

candidate of biological sciences

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Andrey S. Manuilov

Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: andre.manuilov@yandex.ru

senior resident

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Andrey N. Bel'skikh

Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Email: belsky@gmail.com

doctor of medical sciences, professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Andrey V. Apchel

Severo-Western Medical Training Center for Postgraduate Education

Email: andre.manuilov@yandex.ru

doctor of medical sciences

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Biron C, Sen G. Interferons and other cytokines. Fields virology. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 2001.
  2. Sen GC. Viruses and Interferons. Ann Rev Microbiol. 2001;(55):255–281. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.255
  3. Hill N, Sarvetnick N. Cytokines: promoters and dampeners of autoimmunity. Curr Open Immunol. 2002; 14(6):791–797. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(02)00403-x
  4. Gattoni A, Parlato A, Vangieri B, et al. Interferon-gamma: biologic functions and HCV therapy (type I/II) (1 of 2 parts). Clin Ter. 2006;157(4):377–386.
  5. Schoenborn J, Wilson C. Regulation of interferon-gamma during innate and adaptive immune responses. Adv Immunol. 2007;(96):41–101. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2776(07)96002-2
  6. Roff S, Noon-Song E, Yamamoto J. The significance of interferon-gamma in HIV-1 pathogenesis, therapy, and prophylaxis. Front Immunol. 2014;(4):498. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00498
  7. Fan-ching L, Howard A. Young, Interferons Success in anti-viral immunotherapy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2014;25(4):369–376. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2014.07.015
  8. Soowon K, Hailey M, Seungmin H. Direct antiviral mechanisms of Interferon-Gamma. Immune Netw. 2018;18(5):e33. doi: 10.4110/in.2018.18.e33.
  9. Fujisaki T, Nagafuchi S, Okamura T. Gamma-interferon for severe chronic active Epstein – Barr virus. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118(6):474–475. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-6-199303150-00022
  10. Andersson J. Clinical and immunological considerations in Epstein – Barr virus-associated diseases. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1996;(100):72–82.
  11. Balachandra K, Thawaranantha D, Ayuthaya P, et al. Effects of human alpha, beta and gamma interferons on varicella zoster virus in vitro. South As J Trop Med Publ Health. 1994;25(2):252–257.
  12. Schroder K, Hertzog P, Ravasi T, et al. Interferon-gamma: an overview of signals, mechanisms and functions. J Leukoc Biol. 2004;75(2):163–189. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0603252
  13. Maleev VV, Shmelev VA, Gindis AA, et al. Modern approaches to the therapy of shingles. Interferon-gamma in the treatment of genital herpes. Infekcionnye bolezni. 2007;5(3):28–32. (In Russ.).
  14. Rakityanskaya IA, Ryabova TS, Todzhibaev UA, et al. The effect of Ingaron on the dynamics of the number of copies of deoxyribonucleic acid Epstein–Barr virus in saliva samples and on the manifestation of clinical symptoms in patients with chronic Epstein – Barr virus infection. Vestnik Rossijskoj Voenno-Medicinskoj Akademii. 2019;2(65):18–23. (In Russ.).
  15. Lotz М, Tsoukas С, Fong S, et al. Regulation of Epstein-Barr virus infection by recombinant interferons. Selected sensitivity to interferon-gamma. Eur J Immunol. 1985;15(5):520–525. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830150518
  16. Sainz B, Halford W. Alpha/Beta interferon and gamma interferon synergize to inhibit the replication of herpes simplex virus type 1. J Virol. 2002;76 (22):11541–11550. doi: 10.1128/jvi.76.22.11541-11550.2002
  17. Patterson C, Lawrence D, Echols L, et al. Immune-mediated protection from measles virus-induced central nervous system disease is noncytolytic and gamma interferon dependent. J Virol. 2002;(76):4497–4506. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.9.4497-4506.2002
  18. Rakityanskaya IA, Ryabova TS, Kalashnikova AA. Influence of ingaron on the dynamics of interferon-α and -γ production and on the manifestation of clinical symptoms in patients with chronic virus Eрsthtein – Barr infection. Voprosi Virusologi. 2019;64(1):23–29. (In Russ.).
  19. Holmes G, Kaplan J, Gantz N, et al. Chronic fatigue syndrome: a working case definition. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108(3):387–389. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-108-3-387
  20. Fukuda K, Straus S, Hickie I, et al. The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121(12):953–959. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-12-199412150-00009
  21. Staines D. Postulated vasoactive neuropeptide autoimmunity in fatigue-related conditions: A brief review and hypothesis. Clin Dev Immunol. 2006;13(1):25–39. doi: 10.1080/17402520600568252
  22. Griffith J, Zarrouf А. A systematic review of chronic fatigue syndrome: don’t assume it's depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;(1):120–128. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v10n0206
  23. Kimura H. Pathogenesis of chronic active Epstein – Barr virus infection: is this an infectious disease, lymphoproliferative disorder, or immunodeficiency? Rev Med Virol. 2006;(16):251–261. doi: 10.1002/rmv.505
  24. Kimura H, Cohen J. Chronic active Epstein – Barr virus disease. Front Immunol. 2017;(28):1–6. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01867
  25. Laichalk L, Hochberg D, Babcock G, et al. The dispersal of mucosal memory B cells: evidence from persistent EBV infection. Immunity 2002;16 (5):745–754. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00318-7
  26. Raulet D, Gasser S, Gowen B, et al. Regulation of ligands for the NKG2D activating receptor. An Rev Immunol. 2013;(31):413–441. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-095951
  27. Simon O, Seliger B. Molecular mechanisms of human herpes viruses inferring with host immune surveillance. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(2):e000841. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000841
  28. Ghadially H, Brown L, Lloyd C, et al. MHC class I chain-related protein A and B (MICA and MICB) are predominantly expressed intracellularly in tumour and normal tissue. Br J Cancer. 2017;116:1208–1217. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.79
  29. Barbu M, Condrat C, Thompson D, et al. Microrna involvement in signaling pathways during viral infection. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:143. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00143
  30. Skinner C, Ivanov N, Barr S, et al. An Epstein – Barr virus microRNA blocks interleukin-1 (IL-1) signaling by targeting IL-1 receptor 1. J Virol. 2017;(91):e00530–17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00530-17
  31. Abboud G. Tahiliani V, Desai P, et al. Natural killer cells and innate interferon gamma participate in the host defense against respiratory vaccinia virus infection. J Virol. 2016;90(1):129–141. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01894-15
  32. Okano M, Thiele G, Kobayashi R, et al. Interferon-gamma in a family with X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome with acute Epstein – Barr virus infection. J Clin Immunol. 1989;9(1):48–54. doi: 10.1007/BF00917127
  33. Linde A, Andersson B, Svenson S, et al. Serum levels of lymphokines and soluble cellular receptors in primary Epstein – Barr virus infection and in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. J Infect Dis. 1992;165(6):994–1000. doi: 10.1093/infdis/165.6.994
  34. Hornef MW, Wagner HJ, Kruse A, et al. Cytokine production in a whole-blood assay after Epstein – Barr virus infection in vivo. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1995;2(2):209–213.
  35. Liang L, Shi R, Xin L, et al. Interferon-Gamma response to treatment of active pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis. J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017;21(10):1145–1149. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.16.0880

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Dynamics of the level of induced IFN-γ before, one and three months after ingaron therapy in patients of the 1st and 2nd groups of chronic Epstein – Barr virus infection

Download (80KB)
3. Fig. 2. Dynamics of the level of spontaneous IFN-γ before, one and three months after ingaron therapy in patients in groups 1 and 2 of chronic Epstein – Barr virus infection

Download (80KB)
4. Fig. 3. Dynamics of serum IFN-γ level before, one and three months after ingaron therapy in patients in groups 1 and 2 of chronic Epstein – Barr virus infection

Download (69KB)

Copyright (c) 2021 Rakityanskaya I.A., Ryabova T.S., Kalashnikova A.A., Manuilov A.S., Bel'skikh A.N., Apchel A.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies