EXTRAPERITONEOSCOPIC PROSTATEСTOMY: SURGICAL TECHNIQUES PRESERVING THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE PATIENT


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Objective.Radical prostatectomy (RPE) performed without preserving the neurovascular bundles and the pubovesical complex has a great risk of developing urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction, which significantly impairs the quality of life of patients with prostate cancer in the postoperative period. Methods. The effectiveness of surgical treatment was assessed in 22 patients (mean age 57.6 ± 6.4 years) with a diagnosis of prostate cancer, who underwent extraperitoneoscopic intrafascial nerve-saving radical prostatectomy with preservation of the pubovesical complex. The criteria for the effectiveness of this technique of surgical treatment were considered the preservation of erectile function and the absence of urinary incontinence in the early and late postoperative period. Results. In the postoperative period, all patients were continent; in 3-4 months, erectile function was restored without additional stimulation by phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. Conclusions.The described technique demands detailed understanding by the surgeon of the surgical anatomy of the prostate and the basic surgical principles of nerve preservation in order to significantly improve the quality of life of patients in the postoperative period.

About the authors

V V Parshin

FGBU «3 Central Military Clinical Hospital namedA. A. Vishnevsky»Ministry of Defenseof Russia

143420, poselok Noviy, p/o Arkhangelskoe, Krasnogorsk district, Moscow region, Russian Federation

B R Gvasalia

FGBU «3 Central Military Clinical Hospital namedA. A. Vishnevsky»Ministry of Defenseof Russia

143420, poselok Noviy, p/o Arkhangelskoe, Krasnogorsk district, Moscow region, Russian Federation

D I Stegantsev

FGBU «3 Central Military Clinical Hospital namedA. A. Vishnevsky»Ministry of Defenseof Russia

143420, poselok Noviy, p/o Arkhangelskoe, Krasnogorsk district, Moscow region, Russian Federation

A S Esipov

FGBU «3 Central Military Clinical Hospital namedA. A. Vishnevsky»Ministry of Defenseof Russia

143420, poselok Noviy, p/o Arkhangelskoe, Krasnogorsk district, Moscow region, Russian Federation

A D Kochetov

FGBU «3 Central Military Clinical Hospital namedA. A. Vishnevsky»Ministry of Defenseof Russia

143420, poselok Noviy, p/o Arkhangelskoe, Krasnogorsk district, Moscow region, Russian Federation

References

  1. Биктимиров Р.Г. Нервосберегающая или нервоуносящая простатэктомия? // Научно-практическая конференция «Технологии XXI века: Реализация инноваций в современной урологии» Владивосток. - 10.09.2015. [Электронный ресурс] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90zf0ECAQEE (дата обращения 06.02.2018).
  2. лыбочко П.В., Матюхов И.П., Аляев Ю.Г., Ахвледиани Н.Д., Иноятов Ж.Ш. Сексуальная функция пациентов, перенесших радикальную простатэктомию: современный взгляд на проблему // Урология. - 2015. - №2. - С. 112-116.
  3. Толкач Ю.В, Петров С.Б., Schelin S., Резванцев М.В. Новый способ реконструкции шейки мочевого пузыря во время радикальной простатэктомии у пациентов с локализованным раком предстательной железы (клиническое исследование) // Онкоурология. - 2011. - Том 7, №3. - С. 99-106.
  4. Alemozaffar M., Regan M.M., Cooperberg M.R., Wei J.T., Michalski J.M., Sandler H.M., Hembroff L., Sadetsky N., Saigal C.S., Litwin M.S., Klein E., Kibel A.S., Hamstra D.A., Pisters L.L., Kuban D.A., Kaplan I.D., Wood D.P., Ciezki J., Dunn R.L., Carroll P.R., Sanda M.G. Prediction of erectile function following treat-ment for prostate cancer // JAMA. - 2011. - № 306. - P. 1205-1214.
  5. Ficarra V., Novara G., Artibani W., Cestari A., Galfano A., Graefen M., Guazzoni G., Guillonneau B., Menon M., Montorsi F., Patel V., Rassweiler J., Van Poppel H. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies // Eur. Urol. - 2009. - № 55. - P. 1037-1063
  6. Rogers C.G., Trock B.P., Walsh P.C. Preservation of accessory pudendal arteries during radical retropubic prostatectomy: surgical technique and results // Urology. - 2004. - № 64. - P. 148-151.
  7. Box G.N., Kaplan A.G., Rodriguez Jr.E., Skarecky D.W., Osann K.E., Finley D.S., Ahlering T.E. Sacrifice of accessory pudendal arteries in normally potent men during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy does not impact potency // J. Sex Med. - 2010. - № 7. - P. 298-303.

Copyright (c) 2019 Parshin V.V., Gvasalia B.R., Stegantsev D.I., Esipov A.S., Kochetov A.D.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies