Modern ideas about the methods of surgical organ-preserving treatment of kidney cancer


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Renal cell carcinomas account for about 3% of all cancers in adults. The annual increase in the detection of this disease is 2,9%, which is due both to a true increase in the number of cases and to the widespread introduction of modern research methods (ultrasounds examination, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging) that allow us to detect small asymptomatic lesions. This, in turn, makes it possible to perform organ-preserving surgical interventions. Comparative analysis of long-term results of treatment in patients after kidney resection does not differ from those after radical nephrectomy, at the same time, the functional results of organ-preserving surgical interventions are more attractive, especially in patients with an initially present renal dysfunction. Currently, there are three methods of performing organ-preserving operations: open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted kidney resection. Contrary to the general interest in the problem of nephron-preserving surgery of renal cell carcinomas, the choice of operative access while performing kidney resection remains the subject of discussion. In this light, the use of intermuscular mini-lumbotomy access can act as an optimal replacement for laparoscopic access or resection from traditional lumbotomy. This technique of operative intervention allows to combine the positive properties of both minimally invasive procedure (laparoscopic resection) and open surgical intervention: reduction of the volume of blood loss and duration of the operation, reduction of hospitalization time, fewer late complications, good cosmetic result. Also, the issues of processing the resected surface of the organ, the time of ischemia, and the choice of the vascular clamp when clamping the renal artery, the distance from the tumor edge to the line of resection are also disputable. In addition, the functional results of organ-preserving resections of the kidney are not sufficiently studied in the long term after surgical interventions.

About the authors

E E Samartseva

Научно-исследовательский институт онкологии им. Н.Н. Петрова

Email: alpinaigor@mail.ru
Санкт-Петербург

A K Nosov

Научно-исследовательский институт онкологии им. Н.Н. Петрова

Санкт-Петербург

S B Petrov

Научно-исследовательский институт онкологии им. Н.Н. Петрова

Санкт-Петербург

References

  1. Аляев, Ю.Г. Резекция почки при опухоли / Ю.Г. Аляев, А.А. Крапивин // Урология. - 1999. - № 6. - С. 3-7.
  2. Брехов, Е.И. Особенности диагностики и хирургической коррекции послеоперационных миофасциальных дефектов боковой стенки живота и пояснично-боковой области / Е.И. Брехов [и др.] // Хирургия. - 2009. - № 10. - С. 10-14.
  3. Волкова, М.И. Стратегия хирургического лечения больных локализованным и местно-распространенным раком поч- ки: автореф. дис.. д-ра мед. наук / М.И. Волкова. - М., 2014. - 42 с.
  4. Матвеев, В.Б. Рак почки / В.Б. Матвеев, М.И. Волкова // Росс. мед. журн. - 2007. - Т. 15, № 14 (295). - С. 1094-1099.
  5. Мерабишвили, В.М. Злокачественные новообразования в Северо-Западном федеральном округе России (заболева- 252 2 (62) - 2018 ВЕСТНИК РОССИЙСКОЙ ВОЕННО-МЕДИЦИНСКОЙ АКАДЕМИИ Обзоры емость, смертность, контингенты, выживаемость больных) / В.М Мерабишвили. - СПб.: Экспресс-информация, 2014. - 283 с.
  6. Погорелко, И.П. Хирургическое вмешательство при камнях почек и мочеточников / И.П. Погорелко. - Ташкент, 1960. - 140 с.
  7. Фигурин, К.М. Рак почки / К.М. Фигурин, К.Э. Подрегульский // Росс. мед. журн. - 1998. - Т. 6, № 10. - С. 665-668.
  8. Чиссов, В.И. Злокачественные заболевания в России в 2003 году (заболеваемость и смертность) / В.И. Чиссов, В.В. Старинский, Г.В. Петрова. - М.: Антиф, 2005. - 281 с.
  9. Becker, F. Excellent long-term cancer control with elective nephron-sparing surgery for selected renal cell carcinomas measuring more than 4 cm / F. Becker, S. Siemer, M. Hack // Eur. Urol. - 2006. - Vol. 49. - P. 1058-1063.
  10. Black, P. Nephron sparing surgery for central renal tumors: experience with 33 cases / P. Black, D. Filipas, J. Fichtner // J. Urol. - 2000. - Vol. 163. - P. 737-743.
  11. Bratslavsky, G. Argument in favor of performing partial nephrectomy for tumors greater than 7 cm: the metastatic prescription has already been written / G. Bratslavsky // Urol Oncol. - 2011. - Vol. 29 (6). - Р. 829-832.
  12. Drachenberg, D.E. Parenchymal sparing surgery for central renal tumors in patients with hereditary renal cancers / D.E. Drachenberg, O.J. Mena, P.L. Choyke // J. Urol. - 2004. - Vol. 172. - P. 49-53.
  13. Gill, I.S. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors / I.S. Gill, L.R. Kavoussi, B.R. Lane // J. Urol. - 2007. Vol. 178. - P. 41-46.
  14. Guo, G. Improved laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma based on the precise anatomy of the nephron / G. Guo, W. Cai, X. Zhang // Oncol Lett. - 2016. - Vol. 12 (5). - P. 3799-3803.
  15. Hafez, K. Patterns of tumor recurrence and guidelines for follow-up afternephron-sparing surgery for sporadic renal cell carcinoma / K. Hafez, A.C. Novick, S.C. Campbell // J. Urol. - 1997. - Vol. 157. - P. 1067-1070.
  16. Jemal, A. Cancer statistics 2004 / A. Jemal [et al.] // CA Cancer J. Clin. - 2004. - Vol. 54 (1). - Р. 8-29.
  17. Marszalek, M. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients / M. Marszalek, H. Meix, M. Polajnar // Eur. Urol. - 2009. - Vol. 55. - P. 1171-1178.
  18. Martorana, G. Role of nephron sparing surgery in the treatment of centrally located renal tumors / G. Martorana, S. Lupo, E. Brunocilla // Arch. Ital. Urol. Androl. - 2004. - Vol. 76. - P. 51-55.
  19. Mullerad, M. Comparison of nephron-sparing surgery in central versus peripheral renal tumors / M. Mullerad, P.S. Kastin, P.S. Adusumilli // Urology. - 2005. - Vol. 65. - P. 467-472.
  20. Patard, J.-J. Morbidity and clinical outcome of nephron-sparing surgery in relation to tumour size and indication / J.-J. Patard, A.J. Pantuck, M. Crepel // Eur. Urol. - 2007. - Vol. 52. - P. 148-154.
  21. Van Poppel, H. A Prospective, Randomised EORTC Intergroup Phase 3 Study Comparing the Oncologic Outcome of Elective Nephron-Sparing Surgery and Radical Nephrectomy for Low- Stage Renal Cell Carcinoma / H. Van Poppel [et al.] // Eur Urol. - 2011. - Vol. 59. - P. 543-552.
  22. Ramani, A.P. Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 200 cases / A.P. Ramani, M.M. Desai, A.P. Steinberg // J. Urol. - 2005. - Vol. 173. - P. 42-47.
  23. Russo, P. Open mini-flank partial nephrectomy: an essential contemporary operation / P. Russo, R. Mano // Korean J Urol. - 2014. - Vol. 55 (9). - P. 557-567.
  24. Simmons, M.N. Laparoscopic radical versus partial nephrectomy for tumors >4 cm: intermediate-term oncologic and functional outcomes / M.N. Simmons, C.J. Weight, I.S. Gill // Urology. - 2009. - Vol. 73. - P. 1077-1082.
  25. Sunela, K.L. Development of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) diagnostics and impact on prognosis / K.L. Sunela [et al.] // BJU Int. - 2014. - Vol. 113 (2). - Р. 228-235.
  26. Uzzo, R.G. Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes / R.G. Uzzo, A.C. Novick // J. Urol. - 2001. - Vol. 166. - P. 6-18.
  27. Wang, Y. Robotic and open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: a matched-pair comparison with a long-term follow-up / Y. Wang [et al.] // World J. Urol. - 2017. - Vol. 35 (1). - P. 73-80.
  28. Wheat, J.C. Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy Department of Urology, University of Michigan, USA / J.C. Wheat [et al.] // J. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations. - 2013. - Vol. 31. - P. 57-62.
  29. Winfield, H.N. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial case report for bening disease / H.N. Winfield [et al.] // J. Endourol. - 1993. - Vol. 7. - Р. 521-526.

Copyright (c) 2018 Samartseva E.E., Nosov A.K., Petrov S.B.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies