The role of pulsed electromagnetic therapy after knee arthroplasty

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Background: Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) is included in current clinical guidelines for postoperative rehabilitation after knee arthroplasty. However, its indications remain limited, primarily for managing pain during the early mobilization of the operated joint.

Aim: To evaluate pain relief and clinical outcomes — including knee function, general health status, objective and subjective knee swelling assessment, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) consumption, persistent pain, daily activity limitations, and complications — in patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) followed by PEMF therapy, compared with a control group receiving sham PEMF.

Materials and methods: This prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study included 72 patients who underwent medial UKA. Participants were randomized into either a control group (sham PEMF) or a treatment group receiving PEMF therapy. Patients in the treatment group were advised to use PEMF for 20 minutes, four times daily, for 60 days. Evaluations were conducted preoperatively and at 1, 2, 6, 12, and 36 months postoperatively. The control group followed the same schedule using sham PEMF. Clinical assessments included the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Short Form-36 (SF-36) health survey, a questionnaire on subjective knee swelling, and an objective measurement of knee circumference. NSAID consumption was recorded at each follow-up visit.

Results: VAS scores decreased in both groups over time, but statistically significant differences favoring the PEMF group were observed at 6 months (p=0.0143), 12 months (p=0.0004), and 36 months (p=0.0213). One month postoperatively, 73% of patients in the PEMF group and 91% in the control group used NSAIDs (p=0.0341). At 2 months, 14% of the PEMF group continued NSAID use, compared to 38% in the control group (p=0.0326). Objective knee circumference measurements showed statistically significant differences at 6 (p=0.0232), 12 (p=0.0016), and 36 months (p=0.0004), with better outcomes in the PEMF group. Subjective swelling assessment demonstrated statistically significant differences at 2 (p=0.0064), 6 (p=0.0005), 12 (p=0.00022), and 36 months (p=0.00031), again favoring the PEMF group. Finally, OKS scores were significantly higher in the PEMF group across all time points (1 month: p=0.0258; 2 months: p=0.0014; 6 months: p=0.0003; 12 months: p=0.0002; 36 months: p=0.0144).

Conclusion: PEMF therapy significantly reduced pain, improved clinical outcomes, and decreased NSAID consumption following medial UKA compared with the control group.

About the authors

Yury Yu. Byalovsky

Ryazan State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: b_uu@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6769-8277
SPIN-code: 6389-6643

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, Ryazan

Sergey Iv. Glotov

Ryazan State Medical University

Email: sergeyglot@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4445-4480
SPIN-code: 7524-9816

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor

Russian Federation, Ryazan

Irina S. Rakitina

Ryazan State Medical University

Email: rakitina62@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9406-1765
SPIN-code: 8427-9471

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor

Russian Federation, Ryazan

Marina Yu. Mareeva

Moscow Regional Scientific Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Email: аkmoniiag@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Clinical guidelines «Rehabilitation after knee arthroplasty». Builova TV, Tsykunov MB, eds. Moscow, 2015. (In Russ.)
  2. Mittal A, Meshram P, Kim WH, Kim TK. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, an enigma, and the ten enigmas of medial UKA. J Orthop Traumatol. 2020;21(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s10195-020-00551-x
  3. Grushina TI, Tepliakov VV. Physiotherapy in early rehabilitation of patients with bone sarcomas after arthroplasty of large bones and joints. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2020;97(3):53–59. doi: 10.17116/kurort20209703153
  4. Langkilde A, Jakobsen TL, Bandholm TQ, et al. Inflammation and post-operative recovery in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty-secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017;25(8):1265–73. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.03.008
  5. Massari L, Benazzo F, Falez F, et al. Biophysical stimulation of bone and cartilage: state of the art and future perspectives. Int Orthop. 2019;43:539–551. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4274-3
  6. Paish HL, Baldock TE, Gillespie CS, et al. Chronic, active inflammation in patients with failed total knee replacements undergoing revision surgery. J Orthop Res. 2019;37(11):2316–24. doi: 10.1002/jor.24398
  7. Prince N, Penatzer JA, Dietz MJ, Boyd JW. Localized cytokine responses to total knee arthroplasty and total knee revision complications. J Transl Med. 2020;8(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02510-w
  8. Sellam J, Berenbaum F. The role of synovitis in pathophysiology and clinical symptoms of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6(11):625–35. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.159
  9. Varani K, Vincenzi F, Ravani A, et al. Adenosine receptors as a biological pathway for the anti-inflammatory and beneficial effects of low frequency low energy pulsed electromagnetic fields. Mediators Inflamm. 2017;2017:2740963. doi: 10.1155/2017/2740963
  10. Karateev DE, Makevnina AV, Luchikhina EL, et al. Efficiency and safety of magnetic therapy using a portable device in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee joints: results of a double-blind 55-week study. Voprosy kurortologii, fizioterapii i lechebnoj fizicheskoj kul'tury. 2021;98(5):53–65. doi: 10.17116/kurort20219805153
  11. Bagheri L, Pellati A, Rizzo P, et al. Notch pathway is active during osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells induced by pulsed electromagnetic fields. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018;12:304–315. doi: 10.1002/term.2455
  12. Wu S, Yu Q, Lai A, Tian J. Pulsed electromagnetic field induces Ca2+-dependent osteoblastogenesis in C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal cells through the Wnt-Ca2+/Wnt-β-catenin signaling pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;503:715–721. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.06.066
  13. Collarile M, Sambri A, Lullini G, et al. Biophysical stimulation improves clinical results of matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte implantation in the treatment of chondral lesions of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(4):1223–9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4605-8
  14. Byalovsky YU, Ivanov AV, Larinsky NE, Sekirin AB. Local pulsed magnetic therapy with the ALMAG+ device in the complex treatment of patients with osteoarthritis. Vrach. 2018;29(12):3–5. doi: 10.29296/25877305-2018-12-19
  15. Zhang Q, Zhang Q, Guo W, et al. The learning curve for minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: cumulative summation test for learning curve (LC-CUSUM). J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9:81. doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0081-8
  16. Heller GZ, Manuguerra M, Chow R. How to analyze the visual Analogue scale: myths, truths and clinical relevance. Scand J Pain. 2016;13:67–75. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.06.012
  17. Padua R, Zanoli G, Ceccarelli E, et al. The Italian version of the Oxford 12-item Knee Questionnaire-cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Int Orthop. 2003;27(4):214–6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-003-0453-x
  18. Apolone G, Mosconi P. The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: translation, validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1025–36. doi: 10.1016/s08954356(98)00094-8
  19. Soderberg GL, Ballantyne BT, Kestel LL. Reliability of lower extremity girth measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Physiother Res Int. 1996;1(1):7–16. doi: 10.1002/pri.43
  20. Agel J, LaPrade RF. Assessment of differences between the modified Cincinnati and International Knee Documentation Committee patient outcome scores: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(11):2151–7. doi: 10.1177/0363546509337698
  21. Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, et al. Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis. 1978;37(4):378–81.
  22. Johal S, Nakano N, Baxter M, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: the past, current controversies, and future perspectives. J Knee Surg. 2018;31(10):992–8. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1625961
  23. Mathis DT, Hauser A, Iordache E, et al. Typical pain patterns in unhappy patients after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36(6):1947–57. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.040
  24. Adravanti P, Nicoletti S, Setti S, et al. Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial. Int Orthop. 2014;38(2):397–403. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2216-7
  25. Jennings JM, Kleeman-Forsthuber LT, Bolognesi MP. Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(5):166–76. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00690
  26. van der List JP, Zuiderbaan HA, Pearle AD. Why do medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties fail today? J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(5):1016–21. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.11.030
  27. Baker PN, Petheram T, Avery PJ, et al. Revision for unexplained pain following unicompartmental and total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(17):e126. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00791
  28. Park CN, Zuiderbaan HA, Chang A, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of the painful unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2015;22(4):341–6. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.03.007
  29. Ongaro A, Varani K, Masieri FF, et al. Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and adenosine receptors modulate prostaglandin E(2) and cytokine release in human osteoarthritic synovial fibroblasts. J Cell Physiol. 2012;227(6):2461–9. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22981
  30. Moretti B, Notarnicola A, Moretti L, et al. I-ONE therapy in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized and controlled study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-88
  31. La Verde L, Franceschetti E, Palumbo A, et al. Applicazione dei campi magnetici pulsati nei pazienti sottoposti a protesi inversa di spalla: valutazione clinica e funzionale. G Ital Ortop Traumatol. 2019;45(1):37–46. doi: 10.32050/0390-0134-116
  32. Yang X, He H, Ye W, et al. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain, stiffness, physical function, and quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2020;100(7):1118–31. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa054
  33. Vigano M, Perucca Orfei C, Ragni E, et al. Pain and functional scores in patients affected by knee OA after treatment with pulsed electromagnetic and magnetic fields: a meta-analysis. Cartilage. 2021;13(1_ suppl):1749S–61S. doi: 10.1177/1947603520931168
  34. Massari L, Benazzo F, Falez F, et al. Biophysical stimulation of bone and cartilage: state of the art and future perspectives. Int Orthop. 2019;43(3):539–51. doi: 10.1007/s00264018-4274-3
  35. Fuzier R, Serres I, Bourrel R, et al. Analgesic drug consumption increases after knee arthroplasty: a pharmacoepidemiological study investigating postoperative pain. Pain. 2014;155(7):1339–45. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.010
  36. Gladkova EV, Babushkina IV, Ulyanov VYu, Mamonova IA. Chronic endotoxemia and features of the systemic inflammatory response in a number of patients with osteoarthritis requiring primary arthroplasty of large joints. Rossijskij mediko-biologicheskij vestnik imeni akademika I.P. Pavlova. 2022;30(1):87–94. doi: 10.17816/PAVLOVJ70537
  37. Kaminsky AV, Matveeva EL, Gasanova AG, et al. Analysis of biochemical parameters of blood serum in patients with revision hip arthroplasty and carbohydrate metabolism disorders. Nauka molodyh (Eruditio Juvenium). 2023;11(1):5–14. doi: 10.23888/HMJ20231115-14
  38. Woolhead GM, Donovan JL, Dieppe PA. Outcomes of total knee replacement: a qualitative study. Rheumatology. 2005;44(8):1032–7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh674
  39. Karateev DE, Makevnina AV, Luchikhina EL, Tangieva AR. Hardware physiotherapy in the treatment of rheumatic diseases. Voprosy kurortologii, fizioterapii i lechebnoj fizicheskoj kul'tury. 2021;98(2):31–38. doi: 10.17116/kurort20219802131

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. Flow chart of the study design (according to the recommendations of STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology, STROBE). © Eco-Vector, 2025.

Download (245KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2. Percentage of NSAIDs used in the comparison and PEMF groups, demonstrating a statistically significant difference according to the chi-square criterion during the first and second postoperative months in favor of the PEMF group. *p <0.05. © Eco-Vector, 2025.

Download (73KB)
Indexing metadata
4. Fig. 3. Oxford Knee Score during the study period, showing a higher clinical score during each follow-up in favor of the treatment group. *p <0.05. © Eco-Vector, 2025.

Download (93KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector


 


Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».