ALGORITHM METHOD IN TEACHING RUSSIAN AT SECONDARY SCHOOL

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Introduction. Teaching Russian in secondary school, speech development and the formation of spelling and punctuation skills is an important task that involves a number of difficulties. Effective study of the Russian language in a secondary school is often hindered by factors such as poor perseverance, lack of interest in the subject, bilingualism, and more. Russian Russian spelling rules algorithmized representation method is considered in this paper, which allows to improve the quality of teaching Russian to middle and senior school students. The purpose is to substantiate the effectiveness of the algorithm method in teaching the Russian language to children of secondary schools, to consider approximate models of training algorithms. Material and methods. Theoretical methods (modeling, analysis, synthesis) were used in the work; empirical methods (observation, comparison, experiment).Results and discussion. Simple memorizing of the rules does not always lead to increased literacy of students. The algorithm method provides for the joint compilation of algorithmic schemes of various types with students, which illustrate the rule being studied, allow you to work out the mechanism of reasoning step by step when performing spelling and punctuation tasks. This approach contributes to the achievement of a high quality of knowledge through the systematic development of practical skills with the help of schemes adapted to the needs of each child. The training algorithm can have different types: from a clearly formulated scheme (similar to a mathematical example) up to a colorful illustration that will be understandable to children with creative abilities.Conclusion. The algorithm method can be applied to study almost any rule of Russian spelling and punctuation. In the scheme created jointly with the students, there should be a place for exceptions and for examples that the child will enter independently. When creating a training scheme, the student is an active co-author. A circuit is never a closed system. It is being refined and improved in the process of practical activity of students. For children from the same class, the schemes can be completely different, as they have been improved and finalized independently.

About the authors

Yuliya Vladimirovna Podkina

Secondary School 32

Email: yul-podkina@yandex.ru
ul. Akademika Dollezhalya, 27, Podolsk, Moscow region, Russian Federation, 142121

References

  1. Калина В. Г. Проблемы преподавания русского языка и литературы в школе // Наука и образование сегодня. 2017. Т. 2, № 6 (19). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-prepodavaniya-russkogo-yazyka-i-literatury-v-shkole/viewer (дата обращения: 05.03.2022).
  2. Yelenevskaya M., Protassova E. Teaching languages in multicultural surroundings: new tendencies // Russian journal of linguistics. Vol. 25, № 2. 2021. С. 558.
  3. Гараева Л. Интерактивные технологии обучения русскому языку // Вести научных достижений. 2018. № 2. С. 16–18.
  4. Розенталь Д. Э. Русский язык в упражнениях. Для школьников старших классов и поступающих в вузы. М.: АСТ, 2013. 656 с.
  5. Шаропова Н. Б. Интерактивные приемы при обучении русскому языку // European science. 2020. № 2 (51). Part II. P. 77–78.
  6. Янеева Л. Г. Особенности обучения русскому языку детей-билингвов // The Newman in Foreign Policy. № 52 (96), январь – февраль 2020. С. 39–41.
  7. Tolipova D. G. The Russian methodology (the example of the Russian language) // Проблемы педагогики. 2020. № 1 (46). С. 33–35.
  8. Kurganova R. N. On the communicative principle teaching Russian language // Наука и образование сегодня. 2019. № 11 (46). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/on-the-communicative-principle-teaching-russian-language (дата обращения: 29.09.2022).
  9. Юнусова Л. К. Использование диалогового обучения на уроках русского языка // Евразийский союз ученых (ЕСУ). 2020. № 1 (70). С. 46–48.
  10. Зенин В. В. О значении воспитания в современной российской школе (на примере преподавания русского языка) // Педагогика и психология образования. 2019. № 1. С. 50–58.
  11. Зайдман И. Н. Психолого-педагогический аспект обучения русскому языку в школе // Мир науки, культуры, образования. Новосибирск. 2013. № 3 (40). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/psihologo-pedagogicheskiy-aspekt-obucheniya-russkomu-yazyku-v-shkole/viewer (дата обращения: 29.09.2022).
  12. Первова Г. М., Маслова М.В., Павлинова И.А. Актуальные подходы к изучению русского языка в школе // Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки. 2017. Т. 22, № 2 (166). URL: http://journals.tsutmb.ru/go/1810-0201/2017/2/5-14/ (дата обращения: 02.05.2022). doi: 10.20310/1810-0201-2017-22-2(166)-5-14
  13. Titarenko E. Y. Russian Language in multicultural region // Коммуникативные исследования. 2018. № 4 (18). С. 35–43.
  14. Шаропова С. Ж., Камолова Н. Б. Особенности использования наглядных пособий на уроках русского языка в школе // Вестник магистратуры. 2020. № 2-6 (101). C. 141–142. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-ispolzovaniya-naglyadnyh-posobiy-na-urokah-russkogo-yazyka-v-shkole/viewer 1 (дата обращения: 29.09.2022)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).