Demographic sustainability in the regions of the steppe zone of Russia

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The relevance of this study is due to the active dynamics of demographic processes and the changing views on sustainable development of territories. While population growth is not the sole priority, maintaining a high level of human potential and reducing the impact of negative factors are essential for improving the quality of society. The purpose of the study was to assess the dynamics of demographic sustainability in the regions of the steppe zone of Russia in the period of 2003–2022. The object of the study was 17 regions of Russia located entirely or partially in the steppe zone and identified on the basis of common natural and economic factors and location specifics. To assess the demographic sustainability of the regions of the steppe zone, an integral index was formed based on the indicators of demographic processes grouped by the main aspects of population movement. As a result, a change in the distribution of regions by the level of demographic sustainability over five-year periods was revealed. In general, there has been a positive trend in the steppe region. From 2003 to 2007, 9 regions of the steppe had a low level of demographic stability. By 2017, none of these regions remained in this category, moving instead into the category with an average level of demographic stability, with Chelyabinsk and Novosibirsk oblasts moving into the category of high demographic stability. But then the situation in the steppe zone worsened — by 2022, the level of demographic stability in 4 regions reached the lowest values and only 5 regions did not change the level of demographic stability. The influence of external factors (pandemic, geopolitical processes), which intensified by the end of the period under review, is obvious, that contributed to an increase in the death rate and migration outflow of the population.

About the authors

Oksana S. Rudneva

Institute of Steppe of the Ural Branch RAS

Email: Ksen1909@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8425-3301
SPIN-code: 9870-1328
Candidate of Geography, Senior Researcher Orenburg, Russia

Alexander A. Sokolov

Institute of Steppe of the Ural Branch RAS

Email: SokolovAA@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0093-3420
SPIN-code: 1223-3480
Candidate of Geography, Senior Researcher Orenburg, Russia

References

  1. Shriver, L. Population in literature / L. Shriver // Population and Development Review. — 2003. — Vol. 29. — Iss. 2. — P. 153–162. doi: 10.1111/j.1728–4457.2003.00153.x
  2. Calasanti, T. Brown Slime, the Silver Tsunami, and apocalyptic demography: The importance of ageism and age relations / T. Calasanti // Social Currents. — 2020. — Vol. 7. — Iss. 3. — P. 195–211. doi: 10.1177/2329496520912736
  3. Gietel-Basten, S. Depopulation or population decline? Demographic nightmares and imaginaries / S. Gietel-Basten // Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences. — 2023. — Vol. 21(1). — P. 1–12. doi: 10.1553/p-ak37–74ha
  4. Roca, Z. Demographic Sustainability and Spatial Development in Portugal / Z. Roca, M. Roza // Acta geographica Bosnia et Herzegovinae. — 2014. — Vol. 2. — P. 21–28.
  5. Roca, M. Demographic sustainability and regional development: The case of Alto Minho and Alto Alentejo / M. Roca, V. Silva, S. Caldinhas. –Lisboa : Universidad Nova de Lisboa, 2002. — 18 p.
  6. Camarinha-Matos, L.M. Active aging roadmap — A collaborative networks contribution to demographic sustainability / L. M. Camarinha-Matos, H. Afsarmanesh // IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. — 2010. — Vol. 336. — P. 46–59. doi: 10.1007/978–3–642–15961–9_5
  7. Stern, E. Demographic sustainability and rural development policy / E. Stern // Journal of Maps. — 2013. — Vol. 9. — Iss. 2. — P. 154–160. doi: 10.1080/17445647.2013.773566
  8. Фаузер, В.В. Устойчивое развитие северных регионов: демографическое измерение / В. В. Фаузер, Т. С. Лыткина, А. В. Смирнов // Экономика региона. — 2018. — Т. 14. — № 4. — С. 1370–1382. EDN: YRQADR
  9. Рой, О.М. Демографическая устойчивость территории: методология оценки / О.М. Рой // Демографическая и семейная политика в контексте целей устойчивого развития: сборник статей IX Уральского демографического форума. Т. I. — Екатеринбург : Институт экономики УрО РАН, 2018. — С. 38–51. EDN: GHOMYS
  10. Киселева, Н.Н. Устойчивое развитие социально-экономической системы региона: методология, исследования, модели, управление / Н. Н. Киселева. — Ростов : ЮФУ, 2008. — 288 с. EDN: XSXNGV
  11. Лазарева, В.В. Демографический аспект устойчивого развития приграничных регионов / В. В. Лазарева, М. В. Зинченко, Н. Ю. Власова // Уровень жизни населения регионов России. — 2017. — № 2(204). — С. 23–28. EDN: YQYTYR
  12. Чибилёв, А.А. (мл.) Административно-территориальная характеристика степной зоны РФ / А. А. Чибилёв (мл.) // Степи Северной Евразии: Материалы VII международного симпозиума. — Оренбург : Институт степи УрО РАН, 2015. — С. 920–924. EDN: UKZDKV
  13. Рыбаковский, О.Л. Депопуляция в регионах России: итоги за 1992–2022 гг. и компоненты / О. Л. Рыбаковский // Народонаселение. — 2023. — Т. 26. — № 2. — С. 4–17. doi: 10.19181/population.2023.26.2.1; EDN: ZARKPP

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).