Shortcomings of the environmental behavior of families: excessive consumption

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to analyze the attitude of the population towards natural environment and natural resources as a characteristic of human potential. In the first part of the article, the environmental behavior of the population is considered in terms of the propensity to conserve resources and reduce waste generation. Water and energy consumption in everyday life is analyzed in different regions, and their strong differentiation is noted. A similar situation has been found out in the formation of solid municipal waste per capita. There are identified the factors influencing the considered indicators of environmental behavior, the main of which is average per capita income. It is noted that families tend to save their expenses on water and energy consumption, waste management, but not consciously preserve these natural goods themselves. An index of environmental behavior of the population is proposed, which is built from particular indices on water, energy consumption, and waste generation in everyday life. A comparative analysis of the index values for all Russian regions was carried out. The index also makes it possible to track the dynamics of changes in environmental behavior and assess the effectiveness of measures influencing this behavior. In the second part of the article, the issue of environmental behavior of the population is generalized to the analysis of its primary source — the needs of the population. It is shown that the pyramid of needs in the modern world has been transformed, and satisfaction of primary material needs leads not to formation of spiritual demands, but to excessive consumption of material goods. It has been suggested that excessive consumption is even more dangerous for the survival of mankind than overpopulation of the planet. The concept of responsible consumption is considered as a program to combat excessive consumption. It is noted that the problem of greening the needs of the population has not yet found its place in most documents on sustainable development. Since consumer habits and environmental behavior are formed in childhood, the dominant role of the family in environmental education is emphasized.

About the authors

Elena V. Ryumina

Institute of Socio-Economic Studies of Population of the FCTAS RAS

Email: ryum50@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7386-1077
Doctor of Economics, Professor, Chief Researcher Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Ермолаева, П. О. Критический анализ зарубежных теорий экологического поведения / П. О. Ермолаева, Ю. В. Ермолаева // Мониторинг общественного мнения: Экономические и социальные перемены. — 2019. — № 4. — С. 323–346. doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2019.4.16; EDN: VUDGPJ
  2. Sawitria, D. R. Pro-Environmental Behavior from a Social-Cognitive Theory Perspective / D. R. Sawitria, H. Hadiyantob, P. Sudharto, P. Hadic // Procedia Environmental Sciences. — 2015. — Vol. 23. — P. 27–33.
  3. Baldassare, M. The personal threat of environmental problems as predictor of environmental practices / M. Baldassare, C. Katz // Environment and Behavior. — 1992. — Vol. 24. — No. 5. — P. 602–616. EDN: JRLZEX
  4. Corraliza, J. A., Berenguer, J. Environmental values, beliefs and actions / J. A. Corraliza, J. Berenguer // Environment and Behavior. — 2000. — Vol. 32. — No. 6. — P. 832–848. doi: 10.1177/00139160021972829; EDN: JRMEBB
  5. Derksen, L., Gartrell, J. The social context of recycling / L. Derksen, J. Gartrell // American Sociological Review. — 1993. — Vol. 58. — No. 3. — P. 434–442. EDN: HFAXJZ
  6. Яницкий, О. Н. Экосоциальные исследования: междисциплинарная методология, теория, практика / О. Н. Яницкий. — Москва : Институт социологии РАН, 2016. — 327 с.
  7. Yanitsky, O. History of the «Green City» in Russia / O. Yanitsky, O. Usacheva // Journal of History Culture and Art Research. — 2017. — No. 6. — P. 125–131. doi: 10.7596/taksad.v6i6.1330
  8. Потравная, Е. В. Гендерные особенности восприятия экологических проблем коренными народами Севера России / Е. В. Потравная // Народонаселение. — 2020. — Т. 23. — № 2. — С. 73–84. doi: 10.19181/population.2020.23.2.7. EDN: QSVOOU
  9. Мельникова, Т. Б. Мнение горожан России о вовлечённости в их жизнь охраняемых природных территорий / Т. Б. Мельникова, Л. В. Портнова, Н. Н. Обидовская, К. С. Приходько // Народонаселение. — 2023. — Т. 26. — № 3. — С. 117–130. doi: 10.19181/population.2023.26.3.10; EDN: YSFNSC
  10. Рюмина, Е. В. Анализ факторов региональной дифференциации показателей потребления электроэнергии населением / Е. В. Рюмина // Народонаселение. — 2023. — Т. 26. — № 3. — С. 107–116. doi: 10.19181/population.2023.26.3.9; EDN: YRYQVK
  11. Muncy, J. A. Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of the final consumer / J. A. Muncy, S. J. Vitell // Journal of Business Research. — 1992. — No. 24(4). — P. 297–311.
  12. Кушнарёва, А. А. К вопросу о социально ответственном потреблении / А. А. Кушнарёва // Весенние дни науки ВШЭМ. Сборник докладов международной конференции (Екатеринбург, 20–22 апреля 2017 г.). — Екатеринбург : УМЦ УПИ, 2017. — С. 410–413. EDN: XUPJGP
  13. Antil, J. H. Socially responsible consumers: Profile and implications for public policy / J. H. Antil // Journal of Macromarketing. — 1984. — Vol. 4. — № 2. — P. 18–39. doi: 10.1177/027614678400400203; EDN: JNQVNR

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).