Comparison of skin microbiome components analyzed by culture method in patients with autoimmune pemphigus

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune pemphigus is a group of severe, potentially fatal bullous dermatoses affecting both skin and mucous membranes. To date, the pathogenesis and therapeutic approaches to the disease have been well studied; despite this, secondary bacterial complications remain the leading cause of death in these patients. Study of qualitative and quantitative composition of skin microbiome in chronic dermatoses is an actual contemporary problem. These data allow one to investigate the influence of microorganisms on the disease severity, relapse rate and remission duration. Analysis of literature sources shows a high interest of scientific groups in the study of microbiome components of the skin and mucous membranes in patients with bullous dermatoses, however, similar works on autoimmune bullous vesicles are still limited.

AIM: to compare the composition of the skin microbiome in patients with autoimmune pemphigus and a healthy control group based on the results of the culture method performed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experimental, prospective, comparative study. Seventeen patients with previously or first-time diagnosis of autoimmune vesicular disease, as well as a control group of 10 people were included in the study. Patients were enrolled between November 2021 and November 2022. Rakhmanov clinic. All study participants had their skin swabs taken (for patients with rash elements and with apparently unchanged skin in the back or chest area; for the control group, from healthy skin in the back area), after which the material was taken to the laboratory for culture study.

RESULTS: Data from 17 patients (5 men, 29.5%; and 12 women, 70.5%; average age 51±13.3 years) were analyzed. Also included were 10 individuals from the control group (7 women, 70%; and 3 men, 30%; mean age 40±14.7 years). Bacterial growth was detected in all samples submitted. No other microgranisms were identified. Eleven bacterial species were detected on the skin from the rash elements. The most frequent species encountered were: Staphylococcus aureus (in 70.59% of patients), Staphylococcus epidermidis (35.3%), Staphylococcus hominis (17.63%), Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Corynebacterium aurimucosum (11.8%). Twelve bacterial species were isolated on visibly unchanged skin. The most frequent were S. epidermidis (52.9%), S. aureus and S. hominis (35.3%), Staphylococcus capitis and Staphylococcus warneri (17.65%), Micrococcus luteus (11.76%). Fifteen bacterial species were identified in the control group. The following species were found most frequently: S. hominis (60%), S. capitis (50%), M. luteus (40%), S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus and S. warneri (20%). The mean value of bacterial colony-forming units per 1 ml on rash elements was 5106.33±8752.46; on visibly unchanged skin 593.23±1223.06; in the control group 349.33±915.52.

CONCLUSIONS: We were able to obtain primary data on the composition of the skin microbiome in 17 patients with various types of autoimmune pemphigus and compare them with the control group. The data obtained demonstrate a great variety of microbial communities on the skin and a significant quantitative difference in the composition on the skin of patients and controls. A limitation of the study is the chosen cultural method, which cannot fully reflect all the diversity of microorganisms. To confirm the hypotheses put forward, we plan to conduct an additional study involving a larger number of patients and using genomic sequencing methods to identify microbial communities.

About the authors

Natalia P. Teplyuk

The First Sechenov Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: teplyukn@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5800-4800
SPIN-code: 8013-3256

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

Yuliya V. Kolesova

The First Sechenov Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: kolesovamsmu@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3617-2555

Postgraduate Student, Assistant

Russian Federation, 8/2 Trubetskaya street, 119991 Moscow

Nune O. Vartanova

I. Mechnikov Research Institute of Vaccines and Sera

Email: labmicr@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6372-9910

Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Senior Research Associate

Russian Federation, Moscow

Anna Yu. Leonova

I. Mechnikov Research Institute of Vaccines and Sera

Email: anya.leonova.82@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2889-2405

Research Associate

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Schmidt E, Kasperkiewicz M, Joly P. Pemphigus. Lancet. 2019;394(10201):882–894. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31778-7
  2. Melchionda V, Harman KE. Pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus: An overview of the clinical presentation, investigations and management. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2019;44(7):740–746. doi: 10.1111/ced.14041
  3. Tkachenko SB, Teplyuk NP, Allenova AS, Lepikhova AA. On the classification of bullous dermatoses. Russ J Skin Venereal Diseases. 2015;18(2):11–14. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/dv36927
  4. Kridin K. Pemphigus group: Overview, epidemiology, mortality, and comorbidities. Immunol Res. 2018;66(2):255–270. doi: 10.1007/s12026-018-8986-7
  5. Scaglione GL, Fania L, De Paolis E, et al. Evaluation of cutaneous, oral and intestinal microbiota in patients affected by pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid: A pilot study. Exp Mol Pathol. 2020;(112):104331. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2019.104331
  6. Kridin K, Zelber-Sagi S, Bergman R. Pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus: Differences in epidemiology and mortality. Acta Derm Venereol. 2017;97(9):1095–1099. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2706
  7. Künstner A, Sommer N, Künzel S, et al. Busch. Skin microbiota as potential trigger factors for pemphigus vulgaris. Experimental Derm. 2018;27(3):e95. doi: 10.1111/exd.13486
  8. Byrd AL, Belkaid Y, Segre JA. The human skin microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16(3):143–155. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.157
  9. Ederveen T, Smits PH, Boekhorst J, et al. Skin microbiota in health and disease: From sequencing to biology. J Dermatol. 2020;47(10):1110–1118. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.15536
  10. Ellebrecht CT, Srinivas G, Bieber K, et al. Skin microbiota--associated inflammation precedes autoantibody induced tissue damage in experimental epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. J Autoimmun. 2016;(68):14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2015.08.007
  11. Miodovnik M, Künstner A, Langan EA, et al. A distinct cutaneous microbiota profile in autoimmune bullous disease patients. Exp Dermatol. 2017;26(12):1221–1227. doi: 10.1111/exd.13357
  12. Belheouane M, Hermes BM, Van Beek N, et al. Characterization of the skin microbiota in bullous pemphigoid patients and controls reveals novel microbial indicators of disease. J Adv Res. 2023;(44):71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2022.03.019
  13. Boxberger M, Cenizo V, Cassir N, La Scola B. Challenges in exploring and manipulating the human skin microbiome. Microbiome. 2021;9(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01062-5
  14. Moskovicz V, Gross A, Mizrahi B. Extrinsic factors shaping the skin microbiome. Microorganisms. 2020;8(7):1023. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8071023
  15. Araviyskaya ER, Sokolovsky EV. Microbiome: A new era in the study of healthy and pathologically altered skin. Bulletin Dermatol Venereol. 2016;(3):102–109. (In Russ). doi: 10.25208/0042-4609-2016-92-3-102-109
  16. Kapitány A, Medgyesi B, Jenei A, et al. Regional differences in the permeability barrier of the skin--implications in acantholytic skin diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(19):10428. doi: 10.3390/ijms221910428
  17. Zakharova IN, Kasyanova AN. Skin microbiome: what do we know today? Medical Advice. 2019;(17):168–176. (In Russ). doi: 10.21518/2079-701X-2019-17-168-176
  18. Kong HH, Andersson B, Clavel T, et al. Performing skin microbiome research: A method to the madness. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137(3):561–568. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.10.033
  19. Ogai K, Nagase S, Mukai K, et al. A comparison of techniques for collecting skin microbiome samples: Swabbing versus tape-stripping. Front Microbiol. 2018;(9):2362. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02362
  20. Khamaganova IV, Khromova SS, Malyarenko EN, et al. Composition of the bacterial composition of the microbiota with true pemphigus. Dermatology Russia. 2018;(S2):27. (In Russ).
  21. Chen YE, Fischbach M, Belkaid Y. Skin microbiota--host interactions. Nature. 2018;553(7689):427–436. doi: 10.1038/nature25177

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Results of sowing: а ― with elements of rash in patients; b ― with apparently unchanged skin in patients; с ― in the control group.

Download (994KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Teplyuk N.P., Kolesova Y.V., Vartanova N.O., Leonova A.Y.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies