Antegrade transhepatic papillodilatation and dislocation of bile stones in duodenum in management of cholelitiasis


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Endobiliary antegrade stenting by self-expanding stents was performed in 32 patients with unresectable tumors of pancreatobiliary area. Uncoated stents were used in 15 patients with the proximal obstruction of the biliary tree. Uncoated stents prevent the blockade of lobar, segmental and cystic duct. Covered self-expanding stents were used in 17 cases of distal occlusion and obstruction of the peripapillary area. Antegrade stenting drainages of 8Fr were performed in a stepwise manner, consistently performing outside, then outward-internal drainage of the biliary tree, which was transformed into endobiliary stenting. Hybrid endobiliary antegrade stenting, which involves maintaining outward-internal drainage in lumen installed endobiliary stent, was performed in 14 patients. Hybrid antegrade stenting endobiliary allowed to keep endobiliary access to palliative care for all the time, monitor and correct the patency of the stent, by releasing from intraluminal sludge, to carry out a successful reparative stenting “stent to stent” in case of the invasion of tumor or scar tissue in to the lumen of the stent or around of its proximal end.

About the authors

Oleg I. Okhotnikov

Kursk State Medical University; Kursk Regional Clinical Hospital

Email: oleg_okhotnikov@mail.ru
MD, Phd, DSc, Prof. of the Department of Surgical Diseases of the Kursk State Medical University Kursk, 305001, Russian Federation

M. V Yakovleva

Kursk State Medical University; Kursk Regional Clinical Hospital

Kursk, 305001, Russian Federation

A. P Kalutskiy

Kursk State Medical University

Kursk, 305001, Russian Federation

References

  1. Dumonceau J.M., Tringali A., Blero D., Devière J., Laugiers R., Heresbach D., Costamagna G. Biliary stenting: indications, choice of stent sand results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy. 2012; 44 (3): 277-98. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291633. Epub 2012 Feb 1.PMID: 22297801).
  2. Bueno J.T., Gerdes H., Kurtz R.C. Endoscopic management of occluded biliary Wallstents: a cancer center experience. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2003; 58: 879-84.
  3. Rogart J.N., Boghos A., Rossi F., Al-Hashem H., Siddiqui U.D., Jamidar P. et al. Analysis of endoscopic management of occluded metal biliary stents at a single tertiary care center. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2008; 68: 676-82.
  4. Tham T.C., Carr-Locke D.L., Vandervoort J., Wong R.C., Lichtenstein D.R., Van Dam J. et al. Management of occluded biliary Wallstents. Gut. 1998; 42: 703-7.
  5. Cho J.H., Jeon T.J., Park J.Y.,Kim H.M., Kim Y.J., Park S.W.et al. Comparison of outcomes among secondary covered metallic, uncovered metallic, and plastic biliary stents in treating occluded primary metallic stents in malignant distal biliary obstruction. Surg. Endosc. 2011; 25: 475-82.
  6. Togawa O., Kawabe T., Isayama H., Nakai Y., Sasaki T., Arizumi T. et al. Management of occluded uncovered metallic stents in patients with malignant distal biliary obstructions using covered metallic stents. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2008; 42: 546-9.
  7. Fujita T., Tanabe M., Takahashi S., Iida E., Matsunaga N. Percutaneous transhepatic hybrid biliary endoprostheses using both plastic and metallic stents for palliative treatment of malignant common bile duct obstruction. Eur. J. Cancer Care. 2013; 22 (6): 782-8. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12088. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
  8. Moss A.C., Morris E., MacMathuna P. Palliative biliary stents for obstructing pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2006; 2: CD004200. Updated March 2009
  9. Moss A.C., Morris E., Leyden J., MacMathuna P. Do the benefits of metal stents justify the costs? A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials comparing endoscopic stents for malignant biliary obstruction. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2007; 19: 1119-24.
  10. Artifon E.L., Sakai P., Ishioka S., Marques S.B., Lino A.S., Cunha J.E. et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy before deployment of covered metal stent is associated with greater complication rate: a prospective randomized control trial. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2008; 42: 815-9.
  11. Giorgio P.D., Luca L.D. Comparison of treatment outcomes between biliary plastic stent placements with and without endoscopic sphincterotomy for inoperable malignant common bile duct obstruction. World J. Gastroenterol. 2004; 10: 1212-4.
  12. Hui C.K., Lai K.-C., Yuen M.F, Ng M., Chan C.K., Hu W.et al. Does the addition of endoscopic sphincterotomy to stent insertion improve drainage of the bile duct in acute suppurative cholangitis? Gastrointest. Endosc. 2003; 58: 500-4.
  13. Mavrogiannis C., Liatsos C., Papanikolaou I.S.,Karagiannis S., Galanis P., Romanos A. Biliary stenting alone versus biliary stenting plus sphincterotomy for the treatment of post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy biliary leaks: a prospective randomized study. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2006; 18: 405-9.
  14. Banerjee N., Hilden K., Baron T.H., Adler D.G. Endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy is not required for transpapillary SEMS placement for biliary obstruction. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2011; 56: 591-5.

Copyright (c) 2016 Eco-Vector


 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies