Risk factors of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreas resections: an observational retrospective study
- 作者: Moshurov R.I.1, Potievskiy M.B.1, Trifanov V.S.1, Grishin N.A.1, Petrov L.O.1, Sokolov P.V.1, Ivanov S.A.1, Shegai P.V.1, Kaprin A.D.1
-
隶属关系:
- National Medical Research Radiological Center
- 期: 卷 29, 编号 1 (2024)
- 页面: 23-32
- 栏目: Original Study Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1028-9984/article/view/268319
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/onco629851
- ID: 268319
如何引用文章
详细
BACKGROUND: The main complication of surgical pancreas interventions is the pancreatic fistula (PF) — abnormal secretion of pancreatic secretions into the abdominal cavity, which can lead to more severe complications. At the same time, some predictors of PF remain poorly understood.
AIM: To investigate the risk factors for the development of PF after distal pancreatic resection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 40 patients who underwent distal resection. The influence of various clinical parameters on the development of PF after surgery was evaluated. Methods of mathematical modeling and correlation analysis were used. Mathematical modeling was carried out using the Random forest machine learning algorithm, and the indicator of the relative importance of the “importance” parameters was evaluated.
RESULTS: According to the Random forest model, on day 1 after surgery, the most significant predictors of the development of PF were: the volume of neoplasm, age and stage of the oncological process, for which “importance” was 53.2, 13.7 and 12.5 (AUC ROC=62%); on day 3–5, “importance” was 61.7, 11.5 and 5.2 (AUC ROC=79%). An increase in the concentration of pancreatic amylase in blood plasma for 2–3 and 3–5 days correlated with its increase in the drainage discharge for 5-7 days after the intervention (r=0.48 and 0.76; p <0.05). A correlation was found between the level of amylase in the drainage discharge on 3–5 days after the intervention and the level of leukocytes according to the general blood test (r=0.62, p <0.05).
CONCLUSION: An increase in plasma amylase levels is the main risk factor for the development of PF. An increase in the concentration of amylase in the drainage discharge can be considered as a potential risk factor for the development of pancreatic fistulas with clinical manifestations in the following days. The stage of the oncological process, the size of the neoplasm and the age of the patient are also risk factors.
作者简介
Ruslan Moshurov
National Medical Research Radiological Center
Email: ruslan4ic93@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5676-4224
SPIN 代码: 2134-1092
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, 4 Koroleva street, 249031 ObninskMikhail Potievskiy
National Medical Research Radiological Center
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: mikhailpotievsky@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8514-8295
SPIN 代码: 8127-1917
MD
俄罗斯联邦, 4 Koroleva street, 249031 ObninskVladimir Trifanov
National Medical Research Radiological Center
Email: trifan1975@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1879-6978
SPIN 代码: 3710-8052
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor
俄罗斯联邦, 4 Koroleva street, 249031 ObninskNikolai Grishin
National Medical Research Radiological Center
Email: grishinlap@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1703-9115
SPIN 代码: 4707-7941
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, 4 Koroleva street, 249031 ObninskLeonid Petrov
National Medical Research Radiological Center
Email: leonid_petrov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6272-9647
SPIN 代码: 4559-3613
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, 4 Koroleva street, 249031 ObninskPavel Sokolov
National Medical Research Radiological Center
Email: sokolov-p-v@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5050-7868
SPIN 代码: 8527-6278
MD
俄罗斯联邦, 4 Koroleva street, 249031 ObninskSergei Ivanov
National Medical Research Radiological Center
Email: oncourolog@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7689-6032
SPIN 代码: 4264-5167
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences
俄罗斯联邦, 4 Koroleva street, 249031 ObninskPetr Shegai
National Medical Research Radiological Center
Email: dr.shegai@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9755-1164
SPIN 代码: 6849-3221
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, 4 Koroleva street, 249031 ObninskAndrei Kaprin
National Medical Research Radiological Center
Email: kaprin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8784-8415
SPIN 代码: 1759-8101
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences
俄罗斯联邦, 4 Koroleva street, 249031 Obninsk参考
- Akhtanin EA, Kriger AG. Causes and prevention of pancreatic fistulas after pancreas resection. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2014;(5):7983. (In Russ).
- Kubyshkin VA, Vishnevskii VA. Pancreatic cancer. Moscow: Medpraktika; 2003. 375 p. (In Russ).
- McEvoy SH, Lavelle LP, Hoare SM, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: expected post-operative anatomy and complications. Br J Radiol. 2014;87:1–8. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140050
- Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, et al. International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. 2017;161(3):584–591. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014
- Lowy AM, Lee JE, Pisters PW, et al. Prospective, randomized trial of octreotide to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant disease. Ann Surg. 1997;226:632–641. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199711000-00008
- Kabanov MY, Sementsov KV, Yakovleva DM, Alekseev VV. The problem of development pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenal resection. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2017;12(2):112-116. EDN: YTQHHV
- Peng YP, Zhu XL, Yin LD, et al. Risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients after distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):185. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00311-8
- Voskanyan SEH, Korotko GF. Morphofunctional organization of the pancreas and acute postoperative pancreatitis (experimental and clinical aspects). Moscow: Litterra; 2017. 523 p. (In Russ). EDN: ZGLFUH
- Kleeff J, Diener MK, Z’graggen K, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 2007;245(4):573–582. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000251438.43135
- Wang X, Tan CL, Zhang H, Chen YH, et al. Short-term outcomes and risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreatic enucleation: A single-center experience of 142 patients. J Surg Oncol. 2018;117(2):182–190. doi: 10.1002/jso.24804
- Breiman L. Arcing Classifiers. Annals of Statistics. 1998;26:801–849.
- Breiman L. Random Forests. Machine Learning. 2001;45(1):5–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
- Geurts P, Ernst D, Wehenkel L. Extremely randomized trees. Machine Learning, 2006;63(1):3–42. doi: 10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1
- Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning. Cham: Springer; 2009. 745 p.
- Kohavi R. A Study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: Appears in the International Joint Conference AI. 1995;14(2):1137–1145.
- Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, et al. A Prospectively Validated Clinical Risk Score Accurately Predicts Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Colleg Surgeons. 2013;216(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002
- Miller BC, Christein JD, Behrman SW, et al. A multi-institutional external validation of the fistula risk score for pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(1):172–179. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2337-8
- Khatkov IE, Domrachev SA, Tsvirkun VV, et al Prediction of postpancreatoduodenectomy pancreatic fistula with the use of computer tomography. Medical Visualization. 2019;23(1):19–27. doi: 10.24835/1607-0763-2019-1-19-27
- Callery MP, Pratt WB, Vollmer CM. Prevention and management of pancreatic fistula. J Gastroint Surg. 2009;13(1):163–173. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0534-7
- Zarzavadjian Le Bian A, Fuks D, Montali F, et al. Predicting the severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: overweight and blood loss as independent risk factors: Retrospective analysis of 277 patients. Surgical Infections. 2019;20(6):486–491. doi: 10.1089/sur.2019.027
- Vallance AE, Young AL, Macutkiewicz C, et al. Calculating the risk of a pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17:1040–1048. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12503
补充文件
