Dependence of Growth Parameters of Atomic Chains on Changes in the Substrate Temperature

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The growth and evolution of one-dimensional nanostructures on metal stepped surfaces were studied using the kinetic Monte Carlo method. The distribution of nanochain lengths was shown to change differently when the substrate was heated and cooled. Regularities are described that connect the nature of changes in the length distribution and the relative values of diffusion barriers for adatoms on the surface, which will make it possible to predict the length distribution of the resulting one-dimensional nanostructures.

About the authors

A. G. Syromyatnikov

Lomonosov Moscow State University; Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics of the RAS

Author for correspondence.
Email: ag.syromyatnikov@physics.msu.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

S. A. Kudryashov

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: ag.syromyatnikov@physics.msu.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

A. L. Klavsyuk

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: ag.syromyatnikov@physics.msu.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

A. M. Saletsky

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: ag.syromyatnikov@physics.msu.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Клавсюк А.Л., Салецкий А.М. // Успехи физических наук. 2015. Т. 185. № 10. С. 1009. https://doi.org/10.3367/UFNr.0185.201510a.1009
  2. Сыромятников А.Г., Колесников С.В., Салецкий А.М., Клавсюк А.Л. // Успехи физических наук. 2021. Т. 191. № 07. С. 705. https://doi.org/10.3367/UFNr.2020.06.038789
  3. Loth S., Baumann S., Lutz C.P., Eigler D.M., Heinrich A.J. // Science. 2012. V. 335. № 6065. P. 196. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1214131
  4. Fölsch S., Hyldgaard P., Koch R., Ploog K.H. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004. V. 92. № 5. P. 056803. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.056803
  5. Vu Q.H., Morgenstern K. // Phys. Rev. B. 2017. V. 95. № 12. Р. 125423. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.125423
  6. Frenken J.W.M., Groot I.M.N. // MRS Bull. 2017. V. 42. № 11. P. 834. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2017.239
  7. Ferstl P., Hammer L., Sobel C., Gubo M., Heinz K., Schneider M. A., Mittendorfer F., Redinger J. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016. V. 117. № 4. P. 046101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.046101
  8. Zaki N., Potapenko D., Johnson P. D., Osgood R. M. // Phys. Rev. B. 2009. V. 80. № 15. P. 155419. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.155419
  9. Gambardella P., Brune H., Kern K., Marchenko V. I. // Phys. Rev. B. 2006. V. 73. № 24. P. 245425. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.245425
  10. Kuhnke K., Kern K. // J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2003. V. 15. № 47. P. S3311. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/15/47/007
  11. Tonhäuser J., Atiawotse E., Kürpick U., Matzdorf R. // Surf. Sci. 2022. V. 720. P. 122053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2022.122053
  12. Kabanov N.S., Heimbuch R., Zandvliet H.J.W., Saletsky A.M., Klavsyuk A.L. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017. V. 404. P. 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.206
  13. Schiel C., Vogtland M., Bechstein R., Kühnle A., Maass P. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2020. V. 124. № 39. P. 21583. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c06676
  14. Syromyatnikov A.G., Saletsky A.M., Klavsyuk A.L. // Phys. Rev. B. 2018. V. 97. № 23. P. 235444. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.235444
  15. Сыромятников А.Г., Кудряшов С.А., Салецкий А.М., Клавсюк А.Л. // ЖЭТФ. 2021. Т. 160. Вып. 3. С. 410. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044451021090078
  16. Mocking T.F., Bampoulis P., Oncel N., Poelsema B., Zandvliet H.J.W. // Nat. Commun. 2013. V. 4. P. 2387. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3387
  17. Sánchez J.A., González D.L., Einstein T.L. // Phys. Rev. E. 2019. V. 100. № 5. P. 052805. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.100.052805
  18. Syromyatnikov A.G., Guseynova M.R., Saletsky A.M., Klavsyuk A.L. // J. Stat. Mech. 2020. V. 2020. № 9. P. 093202. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/abacb1
  19. Yilmaz M.B., Zimmermann F.M. // Phys. Rev. E. 2005. V. 71. № 2. P. 026127. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.026127
  20. Сыромятников А.Г., Салецкий А.М., Клавсюк А.Л. // Письма в ЖЭТФ. 2019. Т. 110. Вып. 5. С. 331. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0370274X19170089
  21. Tokar V.I., Dreyssé H. // Surf. Sci. 2015. V. 637–638. P. 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2015.03.029

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the main events in the calculation model and diffusion barriers for these events

Download (199KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2. Equilibrium distributions of chain lengths in the Ag/Pt(997) system at low temperature (dashed line) and high temperature (solid line)

Download (115KB)
Indexing metadata
4. Fig. 3. Diagram of nanocircuit length distribution as a function of initial (T1) and final (T2) temperature: 1 - sample heating, average length increases; 2 - distribution does not change; 3 - sample cooling, average length of nanostructures decreases. TC - critical temperature

Download (135KB)
Indexing metadata
5. Fig. 4. Diagram of the morphology of the growth of nanochains on a stepped surface depending on the ratio of diffusion barriers ΔE1 and ΔE2: 1 - chains of finite length are growing; 2 - monomers instead of chains are formed

Download (134KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies