Разум и мозг: какая связь? Клинико-философский аспект

Обложка

Цитировать

Полный текст

Открытый доступ Открытый доступ
Доступ закрыт Доступ предоставлен
Доступ закрыт Только для подписчиков

Аннотация

Обзорно-аналитическая статья затрагивает клинические, нейробиологические и философские проблемы взаимоотношений мозга и разума. Применительно к запросам клинической практики рассмотрены онтологические аспекты сознания и свободы воли, проанализированы некоторые теоретические модели поведенческой психопатологии. Сделан вывод о приоритетности в психиатрии нейробиологической парадигмы при сохранении интереса к современным формам интеракционистского дуализма и дуализма свойств.

Об авторах

Михаил Леонидович Зобин

Центр трансформационной терапии аддикций

Автор, ответственный за переписку.
Email: doctor.zobin@gmail.com
Черногория, 85330, г. Котор, Доброта ВВ

Список литературы

  1. Berrios G.E. Historical epistemology of the body-mind interaction in psychiatry. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 2018; 20 (1): 5–13.
  2. Thibaut F. The mind-body Cartesian dualism and psychiatry. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 2018; 20 (1): 3.
  3. Декарт Р. Размышления о первой философии. В кн.: Сочинение в двух томах. М.: Мысль. 1994; 640 с. [Dekart R. Razmyshleniya o pervoy filosofii. In: Sochinenie v dvukh tomakh. M.: Myslʹ. 1994; 640 р. (In Russ.)]
  4. Van Oudenhove L., Cuypers S.E. The philosophical “mind-body problem” and its relevance for the relationship between psychiatry and the neurosciences. Perspect. Biol. Med. 2010; 53 (4): 545–557.
  5. Wakefield J.C. Wittgenstein’s nightmare: why the RDoC grid needs a conceptual dimension. World Psychiatry. 2014; 13 (1): 38–40.
  6. Insel T., Cuthbert B., Garvey M. et al. Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2010; 167: 748–751.
  7. Ясперс К. Общая психопатология. М.: Практика. 1997; 1053 с. [Jaspers K. Allgemeine psychopathologie. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag. 1965; 748 р.]
  8. Brendel D.H. Philosophy of mind in the clinic: the relation between causal and meaningful explanation in psychiatry. Harv. Rev. Psychiatry. 2000; 8: 184–191.
  9. Patil T., Giordano J. On the ontological assumptions of the medical model of psychiatry: philosophical considerations and pragmatic tasks. Philos. Ethics Humanit. Med. 2010; 5: 3.
  10. Insel T.R., Cuthbert B.N. Brain disorders? Precisely. Science. 2015; 348: 499–500.
  11. Gordon J.A. On being a circuit psychiatrist. Nature Neurosci. 2016; 19: 1385.
  12. Borsboom D., Cramer A., Kalis A. Brain disorders? Not really... Why network structures block reductionism in psychopathology research. Behav. Brain Sci. 2018; 24: 1–54.
  13. Kendler K.S. Toward a philosophical structure for psychiatry. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2005; 162: 433–440.
  14. Miresco M.J., Kirmayer L.J. The persistence of mind-brain dualism in psychiatric reasoning about clinical scenarios. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2006; 163 (5): 913–918.
  15. Ventriglio A., Bhugra D. Descartes’ dogma and damage to Western psychiatry. Epidemiol. Psychiatr. Sci. 2015; 24 (5): 368–370.
  16. Schäfer M.L. The current mind-brain theories in analytical philosophy of mind and their epistemic significance for psychiatry. Fortschr. Neurol. Psychiatr. 2005; 73 (3): 129–142.
  17. Pawelzik M.R. Commentary on Henrik Walter’s “The third wave of biological psychiatry.” Front. Psychol. 2013; 4: 832.
  18. Schwartz S.J., Lilienfeld S.O., Meca A., Sauvigné K.C. The role of neuroscience within psychology: a call for inclusiveness over exclusiveness. Am. Psychologist. 2016; 71 (1): 52–70.
  19. Cooper R. Psychiatry and philosophy of science. Stocksfield: Acumen. 2007; 104–106.
  20. Cash M. Normativity is the mother of intention: Wittgenstein, normative practices and neurological representations. New Ideas in Psychology. 2009; 27: 133–147.
  21. Shepherd J. Consciousness, free will, and moral responsibility: Taking the folk seriously. Philos. Psychol. 2015; 28 (7): 929–946.
  22. Wisniewski D., Deutschländer R., Haynes J.D. Free will beliefs are better predicted by dualism than determinism beliefs across different cultures. PLoS One. 2019; 14 (9): e0221617.
  23. Strawson G. Free will, 1998. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis. https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/free-will/v-1 (access date: 10.12.2020).
  24. Харрис С. Свобода воли, которой не существует. Альпина Паблишер. 2018; 100 с. [Kharris S. Svoboda voli, kotoroy ne sushchestvuet. Alʹpina Pablisher. 2018; 100 р. (In Russ.)]
  25. Sapolsky R.M. The frontal cortex and the criminal justice system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 2004, 359: 1787–1796.
  26. Smithies D. The mental lives of zombies. Philosophical Perspectives. 2012; 26: 343–372.
  27. Davidson D. Essay 11. Mental events. In: Essays on actions and events. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2001; 207–225.
  28. Sapolsky R.M. Doubled-edged swords in the biology of conflict. Front. Psychol. 2018; 9: 2625.
  29. Davidson D. Essay 13. The material mind. Essays on actions and events. Second edition. Oxford University Press. 2001; 346 p.
  30. Chalmers D.J. The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. New York: Oxford University Press. 1996; 375 р.
  31. Зорин Н.А. Методологический самообман. Имеют ли смысл квазиизмерения человеческих чувств и ощущений? Неврологич. вестн. 2018; 4: 19‒22. [Zorin N.A. Metodologicheskiy samoobman. Imeyut li smysl kvaziizmereniya chelovecheskikh chuvstv i oshchushcheniy? Nevrologicheskiy vestnik. 2018; 4: 19‒22. (In Russ.)]
  32. Снедков Е.В. Повышает ли психометрия качество психиатрической диагностики? Неврологич. вестн. 2020; 3: 15–20. [Snedkov E.V. Povyshaet li psikhometriya kachestvo psikhiatricheskoy diagnostiki? Nevrologicheskiy vestnik. 2020; 3: 15–20. (In Russ.)]
  33. Nagel T. What is it like to be a bat, in Mortal Questions. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1979; 165–180.
  34. Maung H.H. Dualism and its place in a philosophical structure for psychiatry. Med. Health Care Philos. 2019; 22 (1): 59–69.
  35. Kendler K.S. A psychiatric dialogue on the mind-body problem. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2001; 158 (7): 989–1000.
  36. Хант Г.Т. О природе сознания: c когнитивной, феноменологической и трансперсональной точек зрения. Пер. с англ. А. Кисёлева. М.: ACT. 2004; 555 с. [Khant G.T. O prirode soznaniya: c kognitivnoy, fenomenologicheskoy i transpersonalʹnoy tochek zreniya. Per. s angl. A. Kiseleva. M.: ACT. 2004; 555 р. (In Russ.)]
  37. Levine J. Materialism and qualia: the explanatory gap. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. 1983; 64: 354–361.
  38. Ревонсуо А. Психология сознания. Перевод А. Стативка, З. Замчук. СПб.: Питер. 2013; 336 с. [Revonsuo A. Psikhologiya soznaniya. Perevod A. Stativka, Z. Zamchuk. SPb.: Piter. 2013; 336 р. (In Russ.)]
  39. Varela F.J., Evan Thompson E., Rosch E. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 1991; 308 p.
  40. Lyre H., Walter S. Situated cognition. In: Handbuch Kognitionswissenschaften (Handbook Cognitive Sciences). A. Stephan, S. Walter eds. Stuttgart: Metzler. 2013; 184–185.
  41. Libet B. The mind time: the temporal factor in consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press. 2004; 272 p.
  42. Решетников М.М. Современные представления о психике: смена парадигмы Неврологич. вестн. 2020; 1: 72–81. [Reshetnikov M.M. Sovremennye predstavleniya o psikhike: smena paradigm. Nevrologicheskiy vestnik. 2020; 1: 72–81. (In Russ.)]
  43. Servaas M.N., Geerligs L., Renken R. et al. Connectomics and neuroticism: an altered functional network organization. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015; 40: 296–304.
  44. Bjørnebekk A., Fjell A.M., Walhovd K.B. et al. Neuronal correlates of the five factor model (FFM) of human personality: Multimodal imaging in a large healthy sample. Neuroimage. 2013; 65: 194–208.
  45. Ormel J., Bastiaansen A., Riese H. et al. The biological and psychological basis of neuroticism: current status and future directions. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2013; 37 (1): 59–72.
  46. Ueda I., Kakeda S., Watanabe K. et al. Brain structural connectivity and neuroticism in healthy adults. Sci. Rep. 2018; 8: 16491.
  47. Kandel E.R. A new intellectual framework for psychiatry. Am. J. Psychiatry. 1998; 155: 457–469.
  48. Zacharopoulos G., Lancaster T.M., Maio G.R., Linden D.E. The genetics of neuroticism and human values. Genes Brain Behav. 2016; 15 (4): 361–366.
  49. Nagel M., Jansen P.R., Stringer S. et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for neuroticism in 449,484 individuals identifies novel genetic loci and pathways. Nat. Genet. 2018; 50 (7): 920–927.
  50. Feldman D.E. Synaptic mechanisms for plasticity in neocortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2009; 32: 33–55.
  51. Khatibi M., Khormaee F. Biological basis of personality: A brief review. J. Life Sci. Biomed. 2016; 6 (2): 33–36.
  52. Zuckerman M. Biological bases of personality. In: T. Millon, M.J. Lerner (eds.). Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2003; 5: 85–116.
  53. Skapinakis P., Caldwell D.M., Hollingworth W. et al. Pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions for management of obsessive-compulsive disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016; 3 (8): 730–739.
  54. Eronen M.I. The levels problem in psychopathology. Psychol. Med. 2019; 1–7.
  55. Telles-Correia D. The mind-brain gap and the neuroscience-psychiatry gap. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2018; 24 (4): 797–802.

© Зобин М.Л., 2021

Creative Commons License
Эта статья доступна по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Данный сайт использует cookie-файлы

Продолжая использовать наш сайт, вы даете согласие на обработку файлов cookie, которые обеспечивают правильную работу сайта.

О куки-файлах