Non-psychotic depression and the social burden of illness

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The burden of depression is increasing worldwide, caregivers are seen as a psychologically vulnerable group, and the social burden of non-psychotic depression remains unexplored.

The aim of the study was to examine the clinical and functional characteristics of non-psychotic depression and the burden of family members of patients most involved in the interaction with patients. The study objectives included analysis of quality of life and co-occurring behavior of patients’ relatives as characteristics of their psychosocial adaptation.

Methods. We used clinical and scales assessment of depression level, quality of life, subjective distress level, and coping behavior features.

Results. Nonpsychotic depression was detected approximately half a year after the onset of symptoms, and in more than 40% of cases — not by psychiatrists, self-treatment was typical. Impairments in social functioning in non-psychotic depression patients affected more in the areas of socially useful activities and social relationships, predominantly in non-working patients. 62.96% of patients rated relationships with loved ones as good, and 82.6% rated support from relatives in connection with the illness as adequate. In 60.87% of cases, there were psycho-traumatic microsocial factors. Spouses (45.5%) prevailed among supportive relatives, of whom 60% were employed, and limitation of labor activity due to the relative’s illness was not characteristic, and material losses were insignificant. Supportive relatives more often than their sick relatives assessed the relationship with the sick as good (81.8%). In about 91% of cases, the attitude toward the mental illness of the relative was adequate, which exceeds the subjective assessment of patients with non-psychotic depression. The close relatives of the patients had decreased quality of life, which was mediated by severity of depression, higher than average level of distress related to mental disorder of the loved one (64,5±9,34 VAS scores). The structure of coping in supportive relatives is characterized on the whole by prevalence of constructive and relatively constructive coping-strategies, the most problematic being the emotional sphere of coping behavior.

Conclusion. Even mild to moderate non-psychotic depression is associated with the presence of social burden of illness, covering not only the patients themselves, but also their family members, which necessitates psychologically corrective work with supportive relatives.

About the authors

Natalia N. Petrova

Saint Petersburg State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: petrova_nn@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4096-6208
Russian Federation, 199034, St. Petersburg, University embankment, 7/9

Mikhail M. Shatil

Psychoneurological clinic №5

Email: mishkajackson@icloud.com
Russian Federation, 195176, St. Petersburg, Revolution Highway, 17

References

  1. Солохина Т.А. Организация социально-психологической помощи родственникам психически больных. Методические рекомендации. М.: МАКС Пресс. 2012; 36. [Solokhina T.A. Organizatsiya sotsialno-psikhologicheskoij pomoshchi rodstvennikam psikhicheski bolnykh. Metodicheskiye rekomendatsii. M.: MAKS Press. 2012; 36. (In Russ.)]
  2. Liu Q., He H., Yang J. et al. Changes in the global burden of depression from 1990 to 2017: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease study. J. Psychiatric Res. 2020; 126: 134–140.
  3. World Health Organization. www.who.int (access date: 14.12.2020).
  4. Depression. World Health Day 2017. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs369/ru/ (access date: 11.12.2017).
  5. Herrman Н., Kieling С., McGorry Р. Reducing the global burden of depression: a Lancet–World Psychiatric Association Commission. Lancet. 2019; 393 (10189): e42–e43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32408-5.
  6. Попов В.В., Трохова М.В., Новикова И.А. Депрессивные расстройства в общей врачебной практике. Учебное пособие. СПб.: СпецЛит. 2017; 199 с. [Popov V.V., Trokhova M.V., Novikova I.A. Depressivnyye rasstroystva v obshchey vrachebnoy praktike. Uchebnoye posobiye. SPb.: SpetsLit. 2017; 199 p. (In Russ.)]
  7. Culpepper L. Understanding the burden of depression. J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2011; 72 (6): e19. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10126tx1c.
  8. Назим Я.О., Тараканова Е.А. Биопсихосоциальная концепция, качество жизни и реабилитация больных шизофренией. Казанский мед. ж. 2010; 91 (2); 264–267. [Nazim Ya.O., Tarakanova E.A. Biopsikhosotsialnaya kontseptsiya, kachestvo zhizni i reabilitatsiya bolnykh shizofreniyey. Kazanskij meditsinskij zhurnal. 2010; 91 (2): 264–267. (In Russ.)]
  9. Мкртчян В.Р. Экономическое бремя депрессии. Московская мед. 2019; 2 (30): 83–84. [Mkrtchyan V.R. Ekonomicheskoye bremya depressii. Moskovskaya meditsina. 2019; 2 (30): 83–84. (In Russ.)]
  10. Хритинин Д.Ф., Некрасов М.А. Влияние психической болезни на семейное окружение пациента. Ж. неврол. и психиатрии им. С.С. Корсакова. 2013; 9: 75–78. [Khritinin D.F., Nekrasov M.A. Vliyaniye psikhicheskoy bolezni na semeynoye okruzheniye patsiyenta. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 2013; 9: 75–78. (In Russ.)]
  11. Kumar K., Gupta М. Clinical and socio-demographic determinants of psychological health and burden in family caregivers of patients with unipolar depression. Asian J. Psychiatr. 2014; 9: 51–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2014.01.002.
  12. Chai Y.C., Mahadevan R., Ng C.G. et al. Caregiver depression: The contributing role of depression in patients, stigma, social support and religiosity. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry. 2018; 64 (6): 578–588. doi: 10.1177/0020764018792585.
  13. Kletthagen H.S. Everyday life of relatives of persons suffering from severe depression. Gjøvik University College Faculty of Health, Care and Nursing. 2015; 73.
  14. Al-Rawashdeh S., Alshraifeen А., Alhawamdih S., Ashour А. Wellbeing and quality of life of family caregivers: influence of sleep quality. Br. J. Community Nurs. 2020; 25 (2): 70–75. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2020.25.2.70.
  15. Huang L.-T., McMillan С. Mutual effects of depression on quality of life in patients and family caregivers. Oncol. Nurs Forum. 2019; 46 (2): 208–216. doi: 10.1188/19.ONF.208-216.
  16. Zendjidjian Х., Richieri R., Adida М. et al. Quality of life and family functioning in caregivers of relatives with mood disorders J. Affect Disord. 2012; 136 (3): 660–665. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.10.011.
  17. Borowiecka-Karpiuk J., Dudek D., Siwek M., Jaeschke R. Spousal burden in partners of patients with major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. Psychiatr. Pol. 2014; 48 (4): 773–787. [In Polish.]
  18. Olawale K.О., Mosaku K.S., Fatoye F.O. Caregiver burden in families of patients with depression attending Obafemi Awolowo University teaching hospitals complex Ile-Ife Nigeria. General Hospital Psychiatry. 2014; 36: 743–747.
  19. Marguerite S., Laurent B., Marine А. et al. Actor-partner interdependence analysis in depressed patient-caregiver dyads: Influence of emotional intelligence and coping strategies on anxiety and depression. Psychiatry Res. 2017; 258: 396–401. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.082.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig 1. Quality of life of supportive relatives of patients with depression and the control group: 1 - physical sphere; 2 - psychological sphere; 3 - the level of independence; 4 - social relationships; 5 - environment; 6 - the spiritual realm

Download (124KB)

Copyright (c) 2021 Petrova N.N., Shatil M.M.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies