Anthroponyms in L. N. Tolstoy’s Povest’ “Hadji Murad”
- Authors: Masolova E.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Novosibirsk State Technical University
- Issue: Vol 16, No 2 (2018)
- Pages: 158-173
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1026-9479/article/view/295310
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.15393/j9.art.2018.5143
- ID: 295310
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This article considers the anthroponyms and the ways of naming characters in Tolstoy’s povest’ “Hadji Murad” and proved that onyms, patronymics and poetonyms fulfil an anticipative or foreshadowing function. Describing simple life of people in “Hadji Murad”, Tolstoy resorts to the generic naming of people by their age, family status and description of clothing. Mentioning the ambitious and faceless high-ranking people the author uses their titles or a military rank that often replace their surnames. Sometimes Tolstoy refers to the multidimensional representation of the characters and combines the indication of their social status, brief biographical information and portrait description. Showing his disfavour to Nikolas I, Tolstoy does not use the title “tsar” while describing him but refers to him by his name Nikolas or his name and patronymic when the latter becomes an object of worship or gives an order to kill people. In “Hadji Murad” Pyotr Mikhailovich Avdeev is a righteous man by Tolstoy. His three-part poetonym bears a powerful moral and religious implication. Tolstoy modifies some of the onyms of certain historical figures mentioned in the story in order to implicitly justify the deeds of these characters. The polemically emphasized discrepancy of the historical person’s onym with that one given to him by the author reflects the extinction of moral and heroic essence in this person. The author does not use the word “enemy”, he deprives the word “antagonist” of its negative connotation and does not mention the nationality of the belligerents; Tolstoy applies the only epic criterion of estimation to all characters and stands for the cessation of the slaughter and for mutual understanding.
About the authors
Elena A. Masolova
Novosibirsk State Technical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: masolova@list.ru
PhD in Philology, Associate Professor of the Department of Philology
Russian Federation, NovosibirskReferences
- Al’tman M. S. Chitaya Tolstogo [Reading Tolstoy]. Tula, Priokskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo Publ., 1966. 168 p. (In Russ.)
- Akhmetova A. G. A Mythological Keynote in Leo Tolstoy’s Novel “Anna Karenina”. In: Fol’klor narodov Rossii [Folklore of the Peoples of Russia]. Ufa, 2006, pp. 83–94. (In Russ.)
- Keldysh V. A. Transformation of the Epic (“Hadji Murad” by Leo Tolstoy). In: Poetika russkoy literatury kontsa XIX — nachala XX veka. Dinamika zhanra. Obshchie problemy. Proza [Poetics of Russian Literature of the Late 19th — Early 20th Century. Dynamics of the Genre. Common Problems. Prose]. Moscow, 2009, pp. 245–280 (In Russ.)
- Kurkina T. N. Istoriosofiya L’va Tolstogo [The Historiosophy of Leo Tolstoy]. Voronezh, Nauka-Yunipress Publ., 2011. 147 p. (In Russ.)
- Lavrova N. N. Anthroponyms in the Story “Françoise” and in the Play “The Living Corpse”. In: Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo Universiteta imeni N. I. Lobachevskogo [Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod]. Nizhny Novgorod, 2010, no. 4 (2), pp. 584–586. (In Russ.)
- Masolova E. A. Anthroponyms and Evangelical Text in Tolstoy’s Stories “What Men Live by”, “Where Love Is, There God Is also”, “How Much Land Does a Man Need?”. In: Problemy istoricheskoy poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics]. Petrozavodsk, 2017, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 109–126. Available at: http://poetica.pro/files/redaktor_pdf/1506099039.pdf (accessed on April 25, 2018). (In Russ.)
- Myshkovskaya L. M. Masterstvo L. N. Tolstogo [Tolstoy’s Mastery]. Moscow, Sovetskiy pisatel’ Publ., 1958. 436 p. (In Russ.)
- Novoselov S. General-mayor Nikolay Pavlovich Sleptsov: Zhizneopisanie [Major-General Nikolai Pavlovich Sleptsov: Biography]. St. Petersburg, Tipografiya Yakova Greya Publ., 1858. 33 p. (In Russ.)
- Poltavets E. Yu. Mifopoetika «Voyny i mira» L. N. Tolstogo [Mythopoethics of “War and Peace” by L. N. Tolstoy]. Moscow, Lenand Publ., 2015. 224 p. (In Russ.)
- Ranchin A. M. Pereklichka Kamen: Filologicheskie etyudy [The Dialogue of Camenaes: Philological Essays]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2013. 656 p. (In Russ.)
- Rostova E. G. Symbolism of Proper Names in Leo Tolstoy’s Novel “War and Peace”. In: Russkiy yazyk za rubezhom [The Russian Language Abroad]. Moscow, 2012, no. 5, pp. 79–83. (In Russ.)
- Savel’ev A. E. The Forgotten Hero of the Caucasian War. In: Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Theory and Practice of Social Development]. Krasnodar, 2010, no. 1, pp. 280–287. (In Russ.)
- Surkova Zh. L. Idyllic Motifs in Leo Tolstoy’s Novel “Anna Karenina”. In: Inostrannye yazyki: teoriya i praktika. Literaturovedenie [Foreign Languages: Theory and Practice. Literary Criticism]. Ivanovo, 2003, pp. 99–105. (In Russ.)
- Tolstoy S. L. On the Reflection of Life in “Anna Karenina”. In: L. N. Tolstoy. II. Moscow, The Academy of Sciences of the USSR Publ., 1939, pp. 566–590. (Ser. “Literary Heritage”; vol. 37/38). (In Russ.)
- Eyhenbaum B. M. Lev Tolstoy: issledovaniya. Stat’i [Leo Tolstoy: Researches. Articles]. St. Petersburg, Faculty of Philology and Arts of St. Petersburg State University Publ., 2009. 952 p. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
