North as a “different” space in Russian modernism
- Authors: Barkovskaya N.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Ural State Pedagogical University
- Issue: Vol 16, No 1 (2018)
- Pages: 189-206
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1026-9479/article/view/295279
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.15393/j9.art.2018.4861
- ID: 295279
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The North appeared in the work of Russian Symbolists and, through a broader lens, modernists as a “different” world, beyond the limits of space. The attraction of the North can be considered as an alternative to the dilemma relevant to Russia at the turn of the 19th–20th centuries, “East or West”. Unlike the horizontal of socio-cultural and political transformations, in modernism the aspiration to the North was associated with the spiritual vertical, and the journey to the North was a spiritual journey, a way out of the crisis, a search for the absolute and freedom of the spirit. In its extreme manifestation, the attraction to the Pole is attraction towards death. Bryusov’s protagonist, a representative of the “elder” Symbolists, sought to surpass the human, to reach the absolute and to become equal to God. A reckless attraction to the Pole is like passion; in such case Eros and Thanatos are inextricably linked. “Younger” symbolists aimed not beyond the real world, but for the transformation of reality and the birth of a new man. The north was the territory of initiation by them, an important part of the dedication, the solar world. Instead of the unattainable “Queen of the night”, the hero is accompanied by Solveig, the bearer of love-caritas. The hero could pass initiation (A. Remizov), but he didn’t always stand the test (A. Bely). Gradually, the “northern” motif shifted from the mythological to the biographical domain, and the name Solveig itself (or other Ibsen’s female characters) became a cultural sign. The modernist myth about the North as a “different” world is initially ambivalent.
Keywords
About the authors
Nina V. Barkovskaya
Ural State Pedagogical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: n_barkovskaya@list.ru
Russian Federation, Yekaterinburg
References
- Abashev V. V. Russkaya literatura Urala. Problemy geopoetiki: uchebnoe posobie [Russian Literature of the Urals. Problems of Geopoethics: A Tutorial]. Perm, Perm National Research Polytechnic University Publ., 2012. 140 p. (In Russ.)
- Bakhmann-Medik D. Kul’turnye povoroty: Novye orientiry v naukakh o kul’ture [Cultural Changes: New Landmarks in Sciences About Culture]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2017. 504 p. (In Russ.)
- Bashlyar G. Izbrannoe. Poetika prostranstva [Selected Works. Poetics of Space]. Moscow, Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya Publ., 2004. 376 p. (In Russ.)
- Belyy A. Ibsen and Dostoevsky. In: Belyy A. Simvolizm kak miroponimanie [Bely A. Symbolism as a Worldview]. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1994, pp. 195–201. (In Russ.)
- Benestad F., Shel’derup-Ebbe D. Edvard Grig — chelovek i khudozhnik [Edvard Grieg as a Man and an Artist]. Мoscow, Raduga Publ., 1986. 376 p. (In Russ.)
- Berdyaev N. Three Jubilees (L. Tolstoy, G. Ibsen, N. F. Fedorov). In: Dmitrieva N. K., Moiseeva A. P. Filosof svobodnogo dukha (Nikolay Berdyaev: zhizn’ i tvorchestvo) [Dmitrieva N. K., Moiseeva A. P. A Philosopher of Free Spirit (Nikolai Berdyaev: Life and Work)]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1993, pp. 132–217. (In Russ.)
- Berdyaev N. Tsarstvo Dukha i Tsarstvo Kesarya [The Kingdom of Spirit and the Kingdom of Caesar]. Paris, YMCA-Press Publ., 1949. 167 p. (In Russ.)
- Blok A. Henry Ibsen. In: Blok A. Sobranie sochineniy: v 8 tomakh [Blok A. Collected Works: in 8 Vols]. Moscow, Leningrad, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo khudozhestvennoy literatury Publ., 1962, vol. 5: Prose 1903–1917, pp. 309–317. (In Russ.)
- Blok A. About the Contemporary State of Russian Symbolism. In: Blok A. Sobranie sochineniy: v 8 tomakh [Blok A. Collected Works: in 8 Vols]. Moscow, Leningrad, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo khudozhestvennoy literatury Publ., 1962, vol. 5: Prose 1903–1917, pp. 425–436. (In Russ.)
- Blok A. From Ibsen to Strindberg. In: Blok A. Sobranie sochineniy: v 8 tomakh [Blok A. Collected Works: in 8 Vols]. Moscow, Leningrad, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo khudozhestvennoy literatury Publ., 1962, vol. 5: Prose 1903–1917, pp. 455–462. (In Russ.)
- Gasparov B. M. Yazyk, pamyat’, obraz. Lingvistika yazykovogo sushchestvovaniya [Language, Memory, Image. Linguistics of Language Existence]. Мoscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 1996. 352 p. (In Russ.)
- Dmitrieva N. K., Moiseeva A. P. Filosof svobodnogo dukha (Nikolay Berdyaev: zhizn’ i tvorchestvo) [A Philosopher of Free Spirit (Nikolai Berdyaev: Life and Work)]. Мoscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1993. 271 p. (In Russ.)
- Magomedova D. M. Transformation of the Autobiographical Myth in the Drama “The Rose and the Cross” by A. Blok. (More on the Problem of the Grotesque Carnival Model of the Symbolist Text). In: Shakhmatovskiy vestnik [Shakhmatovsky Herald], issue 14: A. Blok. “The Rose and the Cross”: Researches and Interpretations, 2017, pp. 20–28. (In Russ.)
- Obatnina E. R. A. M. Remizov: Lichnost’ i tvorcheskie praktiki pisatelya [A. M. Remizov: Personality and Creative Practices of the Writer]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2008. 296 p. (In Russ.)
- Sid I. Geopoetika. Punktir k istorii puteshestviy. Stat’i, esse, kommentarii [Geopoetics. A Dotted Line to the History of Travels. Articles, Essays, Comments]. St. Petersburg, Aleteyya Publ., 2017. 430 p. (In Russ.)
- Tokarev D. «Mezhdu Indiey i Gegelem»: Tvorchestvo Borisa Poplavskogo v komparativnoy perspektive [“Between India and Hegel”: The Works of Boris Poplavsky Through a Comparative Perspective]. Мoscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2011. 352 p. (In Russ.)
- Khanzen-Leve A. Russkiy simvolizm. Sistema poeticheskikh motivov. Ranniy simvolizm [Russian Symbolism. The System of Poetic Motifs. The Early Symbolism]. St. Petersburg, Akademicheskiy proekt Publ., 1999. 512 p. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files



