The concept of literature in the correspondence of Ivan Turgenev and Fedor Dostoevsky
- Authors: Barinova O.M.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- The Russian Foundation for Basic Research
- Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
- Issue: Vol 18, No 4 (2020)
- Pages: 164-185
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1026-9479/article/view/286017
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.15393/j9.art.2020.8602
- ID: 286017
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article examines the concept of literature as a unit of the linguistic image of the world of two great writers, which is associated with each of the authors’ comprehension and figurative interpretation of the literary process and journalistic activity in the 19th century. Using the letters of Turgenev and Dostoevsky during their conspicuous interaction (1860–1867) the author researches the linguistic methods of concept representation, its semantic volume, identifies a set of semantic features, explores the use of various evaluative vocabulary as a means of explication of this concept, establishes stimulus words in the correspondence. Turgenev perceives the sphere of literature as something true, superior and even miraculous, Dostoevsky proposes both a positive and a negative assessment of the events occurring in the literary process. The analysis of the two writers’ correspondence made it possible to disclose the attitude of correspondents to various literary spheres, to reveal the specific features of the concept of literature in the conceptual sphere of Turgenev and Dostoevsky. Accordingly, it was determined that the language units of the concept of literature as perceived by the Russian intelligentsia contain emotive components, and that the epistolary texts contain elements of intimization and frequent use of authors’ specific language techniques, comparisons and metaphorical images. The notions of literature and the literary process are conceptualized in writers’ letters as an animate acting force, an environment that is capable of action. The figurative language means used by writers in the correspondence endow the concepts with a specific image and sensual meaning. The concept of literature reveals the features of their work, the literary process and journalistic activities, which were an essential part of themselves and their lives for both Turgenev and Dostoevsky.
About the authors
Olga M. Barinova
The Russian Foundation for Basic Research; Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Author for correspondence.
Email: barinova.olga.m@gmail.com
Chief Specialist, Graduate Student
Russian Federation, pr. Leninsky 32a, Moscow, 119334; ul. Sretenka 29, Moscow, 127051References
- Arutyunova N. D. Axiology in the Mechanisms of Life and Language. In: Arutyunova N. D. Problemy strukturnoy lingvistiki [Arutyunova N. D. Problems of Structural Linguistics]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1984, pp. 5–23. (In Russ.)
- Arutyunova N. D. Metaphor and Discourse. In: Teoriya metafory [Theory of Metaphor]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990, pp. 5–32. (In Russ.)
- Barkova M. V. Epistolyarnyy zhanr. Istoriya i sovremennost’ [Epistolary Genre. History and Modernity]. Arzamas, Arzamas State Pedagogical Institute Publ., 2006. 104 p. (In Russ.)
- Baturova T. K. Petersburg Almanacs of Pushkin’s Time in the Spiritual Aspect. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya «Russkaya filologiya» [The Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series “Russian Philology”], 2012, no. 3, pp. 96–101. (In Russ.)
- Batyuto A. I. Dostoevsky and Turgenev in 60–70s: Is There Only a Story of Enmity. In: Russkaya literatura, 1979, no. 1, pp. 41–64. (In Russ.)
- Budanova N. F. Dostoevskiy i Turgenev: tvorcheskiy dialog [Dostoevsky and Turgenev: Creative Dialogue]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1987. 200 p. (In Russ.)
- Byalyy G. A. Two Schools of Psychological Realism (Turgenev and Dostoevsky). In: Byalyy G. A. Russkiy realizm kontsa XIX v. [Byaly G. A. Russian Realism of the Late of the 19th Century]. Leningrad, Leningrad State University Publ., 1973, pp. 31–53. (In Russ.)
- Vinogradov V. V. Turgenev and the School of Young Dostoevsky: The End of the 40s of the 19th Century. In: Russkaya literatura, 1959, no. 2, pp. 45–72. (In Russ.)
- Volkov V. V., Volkova N. V. “Mass Literature” as a Book Science and Linguocultural Concept. In: Yazyk i kul’tura [Language and Culture]. Novosibirsk, 2015, no. 16, pp. 105–111. (In Russ.)
- Gut’yar N. I. S. Turgenev and F. M. Dostoevsky. In: Russkaya starina [The Russian Antiquity], 1902, vol. 109, pp. 307–336. (In Russ.)
- Dolinin A. S. Turgenev in “Demons”. In: F. M. Dostoevskiy: stat’i i materialy [F. M. Dostoevsky: Articles and Materials]. Leningrad, Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1924, collection 2, pp. 117–136. (In Russ.)
- Dostoevskiy F. M., Turgenev I. S. Perepiska [Correspondence]. Leningrad, Academia Publ., 1928. 200 p. (In Russ.)
- Dostoevskiy F. M. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 30 tomakh [The Complete Works: in 30 Vols]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1978, vol. 18. 371 p. (In Russ.)
- Zakharov V. N. Do We Have Literature? Concepts “Literature” and “Slovesnost’” in Russian Criticism. In: Problemy istoricheskoy poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics]. Petrozavodsk, Petrozavodsk State University Publ., 2016, vol. 14, pp. 7–15. Available at: https://poetica.pro/files/redaktor_pdf/1482396216.pdf (accessed on November 24, 2019). doi: 10.15393/j9.art.2016.4043 (In Russ.)
- Zakharov V. N. The Lessons of Dostoevsky in “The Hunting Sketches” by Turgenev. In: I. S. Turgenev: tekst i kontekst [I. S. Turgenev: Text and Context]. St. Petersburg, Skriptorium Publ., 2018, pp. 244–252. (In Russ.)
- Karaulov Yu. N. Russkiy assotsiativnyy slovar’: v 2 tomakh [The Russian Associative Dictionary: in 2 Vols]. Moscow, AST-Astrel’ Publ., 2002. Available at: http://tesaurus.ru/dict/ (accessed on November 24, 2019). (In Russ.)
- Kibal’nik S. A. “Notes from the Dead House” by Dostoevsky vs. “The Hunting Sketches” by Turgenev. In: Spasskiy vestnik, 2012, no. 20, pp. 13–22. (In Russ.)
- Kovaleva N. A. Russkoe chastnoe pis’mo XIX veka. Kommunikatsiya. Zhanr. Rechevaya struktura [Russian Private Letter of the 19th Century. Communication. Genre. Speech Structure]. Moscow, SportAkademPress Publ., 2001. 284 p. (In Russ.)
- Kur’yanovich A. V. Epistolary Discourse as a Form of Existence of the Russian Elite Speech Culture (on the Example of Letters of V. I. Vernadsky). In: Russkaya rechevaya kul’tura i tekst: materialy VI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii (25–27 marta 2010 g.) [Russian Speech Culture and Text: Materials of the 6th International Scientific Conference (March 25–27, 2010)]. Tomsk, Tomsk Center for Scientific and Technical Information Publ., 2010, pp. 53–59. (In Russ.)
- Larionova Yu. A. Frazeologicheskiy slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [The Phraseological Dictionary of the Modern Russian Language]. Moscow, Adelant Publ., 2014. 512 p. (In Russ.)
- Leshutina I. A. Konstanty i peremennye russkoy «pochtovoy prozy» pervoy treti XIX stoletiya: dis. … d-ra filol. nauk [The Constants and the Variables of the Russian “Postal Prose” of the First Third of the 19th Century. PhD. philol. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2006. 435 p. (In Russ.)
- Likhachev D. S. The Conceptosphere of the Russian Language. In: Izvestiya AN SSSR. Seriya literatury i yazyka [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Studies in Language and Literature], 1993, vol. 52, issue 1, pp. 3–9. (In Russ.)
- Lotman L. M. Turgenev, Dostoevsky and Literary Polemic in 1845. In: I. S. Turgenev. Voprosy biografii i tvorchestva [I. S. Turgenev. Issues of Biographies and Work]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1982, pp. 20–44. (In Russ.) 24.Mostovskaya N. N. Dostoevsky in the Perception of I. S. Turgenev and
- P. V. Annenkov. In: Spasskiy vestnik, 2002, no. 9, pp. 47–56. (In Russ.)
- Nikol’skiy Yu. A. Turgenev i Dostoevskiy: istoriya odnoy vrazhdy [Turgenev and Dostoevsky: The Story of One Antagonism]. Sofiya, Rossiysko-bolgarskoe knigoizdatel’stvo Publ., 1921. 108 p. (In Russ.)
- Novyy slovar’ inostrannykh slov (NSIS) [The New Dictionary of Foreign Words]. Moscow, Azbukovnik Publ., 2008. 1040 p. (In Russ.)
- Rebel’ G. M. Geroi i zhanrovye formy romanov Turgeneva i Dostoevskogo. Tipologicheskie yavleniya russkoy literatury XIX veka [Heroes and Genre Forms of the Novels of Turgenev and Dostoevsky. Typological Phenomena of Russian Literature of the 19th Century]. Perm, Perm State Pedagogical University Publ., 2007. 398 p. (In Russ.)
- Sternin I. A. Types of Meanings and Concept. In: Kontseptual’noe prostranstvo yazyka: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Posvyashchaetsya yubileyu professora Nikolaya Nikolaevicha Boldyreva [Conceptual Space of Language: The Collection of Scientific Papers. Dedicated to the Anniversary of Professor Nikolai Nikolaevich Boldyrev]. Tambov, Derzhavin Tambov State University Publ., 2005, pp. 257–282. (In Russ.)
- Teliya V. N. Metaphorization and its Role in Creating of Linguistic Picture of the World. In: Rol’ chelovecheskogo faktora v yazyke: yazyk i kartina mira [Role of the Human Factor in Language: Language and Picture of the World]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988, pp. 173–204. (In Russ.)
- Tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka: v 4 tomakh [The Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language: in 4 Vols]. Moscow, State Institute Soviet Encyclopedia Publ., OGIZ Publ., State Publishing House of Foreign and National dictionaries Publ., 1935–1940. Available at: https://ushakovdictionary.ru/ (accessed on October 15, 2019). (In Russ.)
- Fedorenko B. V. From the Search for Dostoevsky. Once Again About Dostoevsky and Turgenev: From the History of Their Relationship. In: Novye aspekty v izuchenii Dostoevskogo [New Aspects in Studying of Dostoevsky]. Petrozavodsk, Petrozavodsk State University Publ., 1994, pp. 242–294. (In Russ.)
- Yaduvankina A. A. The Concept of “Russian Literature” in the English Press Through the Image of a Russian Author. In: Voprosy obshchego yazykoznaniya i teorii teksta [Issues of General Linguistics and Text Theory]. Cheboksary, Yakovlev Chuvash State Pedagogical University Publ., 2018, pp. 126–129. (In Russ.)
- Yaodeng M. On the Acknowledgment of the Concept “Soviet Literature” in China After 1991. In: Vestnik Severo-Vostochnogo federal’nogo universiteta imeni M. K. Ammosova [Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University], 2019, no. 6 (74), pp. 136–145. (In Russ.)
- Hoffman R. Some Implications of Metaphor for Philosophy and Psychology of Science. In: The Ubiquity of Metaphor: Metaphor in Language and Thought. Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publ., 1985, pp. 327–381. (In English)
Supplementary files
