The Dichotomy of the Contemplative and Active Attitude to the World in I. S. Turgenev’s Ontology of Human Life
- Authors: Golovko V.M.1
-
Affiliations:
- North-Caucasus Federal University
- Issue: Vol 18, No 1 (2020)
- Pages: 211-238
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1026-9479/article/view/285857
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.15393/j9.art.2020.7662
- ID: 285857
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The subject of scientific reflection is the contemplation and action as ways of the human attitude to the world, existence, substantiated and accomplished in the ontology of human life by I. S. Turgenev, thinker and artist. The presence of a “thought” and “will”, consciousness and action, knowledge and transformation is considered by the writer as a fundamental characteristic of the human way of existence, which becomes the semantic core of the philosophical and anthropological concept of the article-speech “Hamlet and Don Quixote” (1860), fundamental for the research on Turgenev’s creative work at the level of historical poetics. The activity approach to the person, strengthened at the turn of the classical and non-classical stages of development of philosophical thought, — the time of formation of Turgenev’s world outlook, explains converging of the points of opposite “native types”, their transition from the ideal existence into the real one, their equally weighted opposition to the “evil and lies”. As a result, according to Turgenev’s view the images of Hamlet and Don Quixote come together on the ground of “worship to the Truth” and the “idea of high merits” of the individual, in which the human “nature” and “quintessence” are objectified. Therefore, the analysis of the hamletian and don-quijotian types could be carried out by Turgenev just within the universal socio-cosmic lay of the interrelation of the opposites inherent in centripetal and centrifugal natural forces and their tendency to synthesis. The “tragic aspect of human life” engendered by the inaccessibility of such synthesis may be overcome by means of comprehension of the Truth, the “true meaning of nature”. Moreover, Turgenev’s ontological idea of the “Conciliation and absorbtion of everything existing in the other”, argued at the attitudinal and aesthetic levels, is the basis for the definition of the meaning of human life. This meaning is found in the balance between the content of all human life and the world, society, other people in the name of the “ideal”, establishment of the truth and justice. Hence, contemplation and action as forms of a morally responsible attitude to life in Turgenev’s artistic ontology are directly related to the problem of “high levels” and quality of human existence.
About the authors
Vyacheslav M. Golovko
North-Caucasus Federal University
Author for correspondence.
Email: vmgolovko@mail.ru
Doctor of Philology, Full Professor of the Department
Russian Federation, StavropolReferences
- Veselovskiy A. N. Istoricheskaya poetika [Historical Poetics]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1989. 406 p. (In Russ.)
- Golovko V. M. Istoricheskaya poetika russkoy klassicheskoy povesti [Historical Poetics of the Russian Classic Story]. M., Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2010. 280 р. (In Russ.)
- Golovko V. M. Action and Сontemplation as Parts of Ontology of Human Existence in I. S. Turgenev's Interpretation. In: Herald of North Caucasus Federal University, 2013, no. 6, pp. 171–175. (In Russ.)
- Golovko V. M. Filosofskiy diskurs I. S. Turgeneva kak znachimoye tseloye [I. S. Turgenev’s Philosophical Discourse as a Significant Whole]. M., Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2015. 253 p. (In Russ.)
- Golovko V. M. I. S. Turgenev: iskusstvo hudozhestvennogo filosofstvovaniya [I. S. Turgenev: The Art of Artistic Philosophizing]. M., Flinta Publ., 2018. 344 p. (In Russ.)
- Zhukova O. A. Turgenev v filosofskoy perspektive: rossiyskiy diskurs [Turgenev in Philosophical Perspective: Russian Discourse]. In: Philosophy Issues. 2019, vol. 7, pp. 162–174. (In Russ.)
- Zakharov V. N. Revisited Prospects of Studying Historical Poetics. In: Problemy istoricheskoy poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics]. Petrozavodsk, Petrozavodsk State University Publ., 2018, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 7–16. (In Russ.)
- Zen’kovskiy V. V. Istoriya russkoy filosofii: v 2 t. [History of Russian Philosophy: in 2 Vols.]. M.; Rostov-on-don, Phoenix Publ., 1999, vol. 1. 544 p.
- Kirilenko G. G., Shevtsov E. V. Filosofiya [Philosophy]. M., AST Publ., 2009. 672 p. (In Russ.)
- Losev A. F. Strast’ k dialektike: Literaturnye razmyshleniya filosofa [Passion for Dialectics: Literary Thoughts of a Philosopher]. M., Sovetskiy pisatel’ Publ., 1990. 320 p. (In Russ.)
- Moskvina R. R., Mokronosov G. V. Chelovek kak ob’yekt filosofii i literatury [Man as an Object of Philosophy and Literature]. Irkutsk, Irkutsk State University Publ., 1987. 200 p. (In Russ.)
- Murzin N. N. The Nature of Great Literary Heroes in the Critical Heritage of I. S. Turgenev. In: Chasy Ivana Turgeneva. Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya “Ivan Sergeyevich Turgenev: filosofstvuyushchiy pisatel’ i politicheskiy filosof. K 200-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya”. Vsemirnyy den’ filosofii, 15 noyabrya 2018 goda. Institut filosofii RAN [Ivan Turgenev’s Clock. International Conference “Ivan Sergeyevich Turgenev: Philosophizing Writer and Political Philosopher. To the 200th Anniversary of the Birth”. World Philosophy Day, 15 November 2018. Institute of Philosophy RAN]. M., Golos Publ., 2018, pp. 175–193. (In Russ.)
- Nikiforov A. L., Sokolova T. D. Reality and the Truth as Key Concepts of Philosophy of History: More on the Epistemological Assessment of Historical Works. In: Questions of Philosophy, 2018, vol. 12, pp. 81–85. (In Russ.)
- Rubinshteyn S. L. Chelovek i mir [Man and the World]. SPb., Piter Publ., 2012. 224 p. (In Russ.)
- Time G. A. Rossiya i Germaniya: filosofskiy diskurs v russkoy literature XIX–XX vekov [Russia and Germany: Philosophical Discourse in Russian Literature of XIX–XX Centuries]. SPb., Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 2011. 456 p. (In Russ.)
- Chernikov M. V. Kontsepty «pravda» i «istina» v russkoy kul’turnoy traditsii. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost’ [The Concepts of “Reality” and “Truth” in the Russian Cultural Tradition]. In: Social Sciences and Modernity, 1999, vol. 2, pp. 164–175. (In Russ.)
- Shalygina O. V. K voprosu vyrabotki podkhodov k izucheniyu filosofii pisatelya (na materiale chekhovedeniya) [On the Issue of the Working out of Approaches to the Study of the Writer’s Philosophy (Based on the Materials of Chekov Studies)]. In: Russkaya literatura i filosofiya: puti vzaimodeystviya [Russian Literature and Philosophy: Ways of Interaction]. M., Vodoley Publ., 2018, vol. 1. pp. 241–261. (In Russ.)
- Ern V. F. G. S. Scovoroda. Zhizn’ i uchenie [G. S. Scovoroda. Life and Teaching]. M., Put’ Publ.,1912. 342 p. (In Russ.)
- Mackey L. An Ancient Quarrel Continued: The Troubled Marriage of Philosophy and Literature. Lanham, University Press of America, 2002. 292 р. (In English)
Supplementary files
