Approaches to the regulation of testing and the use of unmanned vehicles in Singapore
- Authors: Dremlyuga R.I.1, Korobeev A.I.1, Chuchaev A.I.2
-
Affiliations:
- Far Eastern Federal University
- Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: No 1 (2023)
- Pages: 123-131
- Section: Abroad
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1026-9452/article/view/126391
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S102694520024102-3
- ID: 126391
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
Singapore is one of the world leaders in the digital of the economy by many measures. By analyzing Singapore's experience in regulating the testing and application of unmanned vehicles, it is possible to find promising ways to develop the Russian regulatory framework in this area. The article examines the general framework for the development of the regulatory framework in the sphere of regulation of relations regarding the use of intelligent technologies, as well as the basic principles of regulation of testing and application of artificial intelligence. The analysis of the regulatory framework regulating the rules of unmanned vehicles in Singapore is carried out. The text explores common regulatory intervention strategies in the implementation of new technologies. The author’s team concludes that Singapore has moved away from a prohibitionist approach and a control-oriented strategy in the regulation of AI-driven vehicles. Authorities in Singapore combine different strategies to regulate the testing and use of unmanned in favor of an adaptation-oriented approach. A risk tolerance approach is also applied to the regulation of testing and application of unmanned vehicles.
Full Text
About the authors
Roman Igorevich Dremlyuga
Far Eastern Federal University
Email: Dremliuga.ri@dvfu.ru
Russian Federation,
Alexander I. Korobeev
Far Eastern Federal University
Email: korobeev.ai@dvfu.ru
Russian Federation
Alexander I. Chuchaev
Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: moksha1@rambler.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow
References
- Gracheva Yu. V., Korobeev A.I., Malikov S.V., Chuchaev A.I. Criminal law risks in the field of digital technologies: problems and suggestions // Lex russica (Russian Law). 2020. Vol. 73. No. 1 (158). P. 145–159 (in Russ.).
- Dremlyuga R.I. Fundamentals of national regulation of the use of artificial intelligence: Singapore experience // Asia-Pacific Region: economics, politics, law. 2022. Vol. 24. No. 1. P. 214–224 (in Russ.).
- Dremlyuga R.I., Kripakova A.V., Yakovenko A.A. Regulation of testing and use of unmanned vehicles: US experience // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Jurisprudence. 2020. No. 3 (82). P. 68–85 (in Russ.).
- Ching S., Anowar S., Cheah L. To embrace or not to embrace? Understanding public's dilemma about autonomous mobility services: A case study of Singapore // Case Studies on Transport Policy. 2021. No. 9 (4). P. 1542–1552.
- Duit A. Resilience thinking: Lessons for public administration // Public Administration. 2015. No. 94 (2). P. 364–380.
- Egbue O., Long S. Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions // Energy Policy. 2012. No. 48. P. 717–729.
- Hong S., Lee S. Adaptive governance and decentralization: Evidence from regulation of the sharing economy in multi-level governance // Government Information Quarterly. 2018. No. 35 (2). P. 299–305.
- Li Y., Taeihagh A., De Jong M. The Governance of Risks in Ridesharing: A Revelatory Case from Singapore // Energies. 2018. No. 11 (5). P. 1277.
- Mergel I., Gong Y., Bertot J. Agile government: Systematic literature review and future research // Government Information Quarterly. 2018. No. 35 (2). P. 291–298.
- Miller V., Hayward K.J. I Did my bit’: Terrorism, tarde and the vehicle ramming attack as an imitative event // British Journal of Criminology. 2019. No. 59 (1). P. 9 - 11.
- Moran M. The British regulatory state: high modernism and hyper-innovation. Oxford University Press on Demand, 2003.
- O’Grady N. Data, interface, security: Assembling technologies that govern the future // Geoforum. 2015. Vol. 64. P. 130 - 137.
- Ong I.B.L. Singapore water management policies and practices // International Journal of Water Resources Development. 2010. No. 26 (1). P. 65–80.
- Pang K.K. Road Traffic Act (Chapt.276): Road Traffic (Autonomous Motor Vehicles) rules 2017. Singapore, 2017.
- Quezada G., Walton A., Sharma A. Risks and tensions in water industry innovation: understanding adoption of decentralised water systems from a socio-technical transitions perspective // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016. Vol. 113. P. 263 - 273.
- Santos G. Urban Congestion Charging: A Comparison between London and Singapore // Transport Reviews. 2005. 25:5. P. 511 - 534.
- Taeihagh A., Givoni M., Bañares-Alcántara R. Which Policy First? A Network-Centric Approach for the Analysis and Ranking of Policy Measures // Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 2013. No. 40 (4). P. 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1068/b38058
- Tan S.Y., Taeihagh A. Adaptive governance of autonomous vehicles: Accelerating the adoption of disruptive technologies in Singapore // Government Information Quarterly. 2021. No. 38 (2). P. 101546.
- Wang C., Megdalia R., Zheng L. Towards a typology of adaptive governance in the digital government context: The role of decision-making and accountability// Government Information Quarterly. 2018. No. 35 (2). P. 306–322.
