The consequences of Brexit for the constitutional system of the Great Britain

Cover Page

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The vote in the 2016 referendum on exit from the EU was held under the slogan “take back con-trol”, which, in particular, meant the return of parliamentary sovereignty, lost as a result of the transfer of some powers to the supranational level and the impossibility for the UK Parliament to influence decisions taken in Brussels. However, in the process of withdrawal, the UK faced a number of constitutional problems that led to one of the most serious constitutional crises in the history of British parliamentarism, caused by the clash of parliamentary and popular sovereignty, on the one hand, and the lack of a written constitution clearly delineating the powers of the three branches of government, on the other hand. This article is devoted to the analysis of the conse-quences of this crisis for the stability of the traditional constitutional system of Great Britain.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Svetlana I. Kodaneva

Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INION)

Author for correspondence.
Email: kodanevas@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Baldini G, Bressanelli E, Massetti E. Back to the Westminster model? The Brexit process and the UK political system // International Political Science Review. 2021. doi: 10.1177/0192512120967375
  2. Bogdanor V. The EU referendum shows how the sovereignty of Britain’s people can now trump its parliament // The Daily Telegraph. 26.06.2016. URL: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/26/the-eu-referendum-shows-how-the-sovereignty-of-britains-people-c/
  3. Curtice J. Brave New World: Understanding the 2019 General Election // Political Insight. 2020. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 8 - 12. doi: 10.1177/2041905820911739
  4. Cutts D., Goodwin M., Heath O., Surridge P. Brexit, the 2019 General Election and the Realignment of British Politics // The Political Quarterly. 2020. Vol. 91. Issue1. P. 7 - 23. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12815
  5. Dicey A.V. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, Roger E. Michener, North Shadeland, Indianapolis, Indiana, 1982. URL: https://files.libertyfund.org/files/1714/0125_Bk.pdf
  6. Evans G., Mellon J. The re-shaping of class voting // British Election Study. 2020. URL: https://www.britishelectionstudy.com/bes-findings/the-re-shaping-of-class-voting-in-the-2019-election-by-geoffrey-evans-and-jonathan-mellon/#.YcWX1WhBzIU
  7. Fieldhouse E., Green J., Evans G. et al. Electoral Shocks, The Volatile Voter in a Turbulent World. Oxford, 2020. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198800583.001.0001
  8. Foley M. The Silence of Constitutions: Gaps, 'abeyances' and Political Temperament in the Maintenance of Government. Routledge, 2011.
  9. Horsley T. Constitutional functions and institutional responsibility: A functional analysis of the UK constitution // Legal Studies. 2021. Р. 1 - 21. doi: 10.1017/lst.2021.32
  10. Johnston R., Pattie Ch., Rossiter D. A Re-Dividing Nation? A newly polarised electoral geography of Great Britain // British Politics. 2017. Vol. 12. No. 4. P. 521–535. doi: 10.1057/s41293-017-0052-x
  11. Jowell J. Parliamentary sovereignty under the new constitutional hypothesis // Public law. 2006. Vol. 3. P. 562–579. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32894782_Parliamentary_Sovereignty_under_the_New_Constitutional_Hypothesis
  12. Komárek J. Reasoning with Previous Decisions: Beyond the Doctrine of Precedent // The American Journal of Comparative Law. 2013. Vol. 61. No. 1. Р. 149 - 171. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41721717
  13. McConalogue J. The British Constitution Resettled? Parliamentary Sovereignty after the EU Referendum // The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2019. Vol. 21. Р. 439–458. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148118815409
  14. McHarg A. Navigating without maps: Constitutional silence and the management of the Brexit crisis // International Journal of Constitution Law. 2018. Vol. 16. No. 3. P. 952–968. doi: 10.1093/icon/moy068
  15. Thompson L. From Minority Government to Parliamentary Stalemate: Why Election 2019 was Needed to Break the Brexit Logjam // Britain Votes. 2019. Р. 48–64. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsaa038
  16. White S. Brexit and the future of the UK constitution // International Political Science Review. 2021. P. 1–15. doi: 10.1177/0192512121995133
  17. White S.G. The Referendum in the UK’s Constitution: From Parliamentary to Popular Sovereignty? // Parliamentary Affairs. 2020. Р. 1–18. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsaa062

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies