Peculiarities of Body Balance on Hinged Supports and Sliding Closure

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

 The equilibrium of a body supported by rigid and telescopic supports on fixed hinges is considered. It is shown that the addition of a potentially sliding joint may not provide mobility to the design, as well as the addition of a rotary joint. A paradox was discovered for a sliding support: the equations of seemingly obvious equilibrium are not fulfilled. Deviations are introduced to regularize the problem. Internal reactions remain statically indeterminate, while the magnitude of these reactions may be significant. It is shown that external reactions tend to infinity as the introduced deviations decrease. This explains the inconsistency of the equilibrium equations: a pair of infinite forces with zero leverage, generally speaking, is not equivalent to zero force, but can create any moment, including the balancing moment of gravity. It can be assumed that some of the major accidents involving building structures are associated with these features.

About the authors

M. Z. Dosaev

Institute of Mechanics, Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: dosayev@imec.msu.ru
Moscow, 119192 Russia

V. A. Samsonov

Institute of Mechanics, Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: dosayev@imec.msu.ru
Moscow, 119192 Russia

References

  1. Березкин Е.Н. Лекции по теоретической механике. Часть 1. М.: Изд-во Моск. ун-та, 1967. 313 с.
  2. Сборник заданий для курсовых работ по теоретической механике / Под ред. А.А. Яблонского. Изд. 5, испр. М.: “ИНТЕГРАЛ-ПРЕСС”, 1998. 382 с.
  3. Liu Y.Q., Liang F., Au Francis T.K. Experimental study of durable low-friction concrete contacts for precast segmental columns with resettable sliding joints // Constr. Build. Mater. 2022. V. 318. P. 126192. doi.org/.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126192
  4. Jiang Yu.-F., Guo Z.-X., Basha S.H., Chai Z.-L. Sliding bed joint for seismic response control of ashlar stone masonry structures // Eng. Struct. 2021. V. 244. P. 112734. doi.org/.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112734
  5. Liu Y.Q., Liang F., Au Francis T.K. Precast segmental bridge columns with resettable sliding-joints – An inspiration from ancient Chinese pagodas // Struct. 2021. V. 33. P. 615–626. doi.org/.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.120
  6. Di Trapani F., Bolis V., Basone F., Cavaleri L., Preti M. Traditional vs. sliding-joint masonry infilled frames: Seismic reliability and EAL // Proc. Struct. Integr. 2020. V. 26. P. 383–392. doi.org/.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2020.06.049
  7. Morandi P., Milanesi R.R., Magenes G. Innovative solution for seismic-resistant masonry infills with sliding joints: in-plane experimental performance // Eng. Struct. 2018. V. 176. P. 719–733. doi.org/.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.018
  8. Базаренко Н.А. Контактные задачи для круглой плиты со скользящей заделкой по торцу // Изв. РАН. МТТ. 2014. № 3. С. 93–106.
  9. Маркин Ю.С., Маркин О.Ю., Рахматуллин Р.Р., Каркаев Р.Б., Штыкова Е.В., Хабибуллин Б.М. Составная конструкция устройства с жесткой заделкой, шарнирно-подвижной опорой, невесомым стержнем и скользящим соединением. Патент на полезную модель: RU 124798 U1. 2013.
  10. Досаев М.З., Самсонов В.А. Особенности динамики систем с упругими элементами и сухим трением // Прикл. мат. мех. 2021. Т. 85. № 4. С. 426–435.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2.

Download (62KB)
3.

Download (79KB)
4.

Download (90KB)
5.

Download (94KB)
6.

Download (70KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 М.З. Досаев, В.А. Самсонов

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies