New Approaches to Systematization and Treatment of Impression Monocondylar Tibial Plateau Fractures

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Treatment results for 109 patients (mean age 56 ± 1.7 years) with monocondylar impression tibial plateau fractures (ITPF) are presented. Patients from the control group (n=63) were operated on during the period from 2008 to 1010, patients from the main group (n=46) - from 2011 to 2013. Patients from the main group were treated with regard for injury localization relative to plateau center according to proposed operational classification of impression fractures (by CT data) and algorithm to choose the osteosynthesis technique depending on the anatomic and morphologic peculiarities of the intra-articular injury. In patients from the main group the evaluation by Rasmussen scale 36 months after intervention showed excellent results in 15 (38.4%), good - in 22 (56.4%), satisfactory - in 5 (12.8%) of patients, no poor results were recorded, and in patients from the control group - in 6 (11.5%), 8 (15.3%), 36 (69.3%) and 3 (5,8%) patients, respectively. Three (7.6%) complications (secondary displacement of fragments (2), knee contracture (1)) were observed in the main group, and 11 (20.9%) in the control group (20.9%) - local infectious inflammatory process (4), secondary displacement of plateau fragments (6), condylar sag (1). Perfected tactics of treatment of patients with ITPF enabled to achieve 3.48 times more excellent and good results (p<0.05).

About the authors

M. V Gilev

Ural State Medical University

Email: gilevmikhail@gmail.com
канд. мед. наук, ассистент кафедры травматологии и ортопедии ФПК и ПП УГМУ Тел. +7 (343) 371-34-90. Ekaterinburg, Russia

E. A Volokitina

Ural State Medical University

доктор мед. наук, профессор кафедры травматологии и ортопедии ФПК и ПП УГМУ Ekaterinburg, Russia

Yu. V Antoniadi

Ural State Medical University

канд. мед. наук, доцент кафедры травматологии и ортопедии ФПК и ПП УГМУ Ekaterinburg, Russia

S. M Kutepov

Ural State Medical University

доктор мед. наук, профессор, ректор УГМУ, зав. кафедрой травматологии и ортопедии ФПК и ПП УГМУ Ekaterinburg, Russia

References

  1. Гилев М.В., Волокитина Е.А., Антониади Ю.В, Черницын Д.Н. Новые подходы к лечению внутрисуставных переломов проксимального отдела большеберцовой кости. Уральский медицинский журнал. 2012; 6: 121-7.
  2. Шаповалов В.М., Хоминец В.В., Рикун О.В., Гладков Р.В. Хирургическое лечение переломов мыщелков большеберцовой кости. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2011; 1 (59): 53-60.
  3. Гилев М.В. Хирургическое лечение внутрисуставных переломов проксимального отдела большеберцовой кости. Гений ортопедии. 2014; 1: 75-81.
  4. Dodd A., Oddone P.E., Korley R.S. The effect of three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions on preoperative planning of tibial plateau fractures: a case-control series. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015; 13: 144-6.
  5. Browner B.D., Jupiter J.B., Levine A.M. Skeletal trauma. 4th ed. v. 2. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2009.
  6. Yu G.R., Xia J., Zhou J.Q., Yang Y.F. Low-energy fracture of posterolateral tibial plateau: treatment by a posterolateral prone approach. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 72 (5): 1416-23.
  7. Dreumel R.L., Wunnik B.P., Janssen L. Mid- to long-term functional outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures. Injury. 2015; 15: 294-6.
  8. Iundusi R., Gasbarra E., D'Arienzo M., Piccioli A., Tarantino U. Augmentation of tibial plateau fractures with an injectable bone substitute: CERAMENT™. Three-year follow-up from a prospective study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2015; 13: 115.
  9. Воронкевич И.А., Тихилов Р.М. Внутрисуставные остеотомии по поводу последствий переломов мыщелков большеберцовой кости. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2010; 3 (57): 87-91.
  10. Schatzker J., McBroom R., Bruce D. The tibial plateau fracture. The Toronto experience 1968-1975. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1979; 138: 94-104.
  11. Luo C.F., Smith W.R., Hu C.F. Computed tomography-based Three-Column Classification in tibial plateau fractures: introduction of its utility and assessment of its reproducibility. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 73 (3): 731-7.
  12. Scott W.N. Insall and Scott surgery of the knee. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2012.
  13. Yoon R.S., Liporace F.A., Egol K.A. Definitive fixation of tibial plateau fractures. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 2015; 46 (3): 363-75.
  14. Canale S.T., Beaty J.H. Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. v. 3. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2013.
  15. Koval K.J., Zuckerman J.D. Handbook of fractures, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006.
  16. Morrey B.F., Morrey M.C. Master techniques in orthopaedic surgery. Relevant surgical exposures, 1st ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2008.
  17. Ruedi T.P., Murphy W.M. AO principles of fracture management. New York: Thieme; 2000.
  18. Гилев М.В., Антониади Ю.А., Волокитина Е.А. Хирургический доступ к наружному мыщелку для остеосинтеза при переломах. Патент РФ № 2525211; 2014.
  19. Кутепов С.М., Волокитина Е.А., Гилев М.В., Антониади Ю.В. Хирургическое лечение монокондилярных переломов тибиального плато с использованием L-образного наружного и L-образного внутреннего доступов. Вестник Уральской медицинской академической науки. 2015; 1: 66-71.
  20. Bono C.M., Levine R.G., Rao J.P., Behrens F.F. Monarticular proximal tibia fractures: treatment options and decision making. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2006; 9 (3): 176-86.
  21. Fernandes D.L. Anterior approach to the кnее with osteotomy of the tibial tubercle for bicondilar tibial fractures. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1988; 70 (2): 208-19.
  22. Rademakers M.V., Kerkhoffs M.M., Sierevelt I.N. Operative treatment of 109 tibial plateau fractures: five- to 27-year follow-up results J. Orthop. Trauma. 2007; 21: 5-10.

Copyright (c) 2016 Eco-Vector



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies