ACCURACY AND RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGICAL MODELS BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Assessing reliability of engineering geological models still requires further studies.. Much more attention is paid to the methodology for assessing the reliability and quality of models in oil and gas geology. A comparison of the methods used in this field with the methodology for assessing the quality of machine learning models showed the similarity of principles and approaches. Therefore, the algorithms for engineering geological modeling can be justified and calibrated using tools for evaluating the quality of machine learning models. The article systematizes and analyzes the metrics used in solving problems and classification, and describes the methodology of using cross-validation techniques to assess the quality of algorithms. The practical experience of constructing a computer stratigraphic-genetic model using various algorithmic approaches is described: on the basis of triangulation constructions, using ordinary kriging with automated variogram composition and using the custom heuristic algorithm that considers the history of sedimentation and technogenic transformation of the territory. It is shown that the problem of three-dimensional geological modeling can be considered both as a classification and regression problem. The error index of the stratigraphic-genetic model is proposed based on the calculation of the average absolute errors in determining the spatial position of geological layers. The proposed approaches are applicable to testing methodologies of engineering geological modeling in a broad sense, the verification of predictive models of any kind being the most difficult issue. It is emphasized that the development and filling of databases of various engineering and geological data should be intensified, including field and laboratory data, the results of their processing, forecast estimates and conclusions based on them, monitoring measurements of various kinds, remote sensing data, etc. The possibilities of processing and analyzing big data in engineering geology will allow us to move from subjective expert estimations to the application of modern approaches to modeling complexly formalized objects and phenomena using the capabilities of machine learning and artificial intelligence.

About the authors

R. Yu. Zhidkov

State Budgetary Institution “Mosgorgeotrest”

Author for correspondence.
Email: rzhidkov@mggt.ru
Russia, 123040, Moscow, Leningradsii pr. 11

N. V. Abakumova

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: abakumova.nv@mail.ru
Russia, 119234, Moscow, Leninskie gory 1

N. N. Rakitina

State Budgetary Institution “Mosgorgeotrest”

Email: abakumova.nv@mail.ru
Russia, 123040, Moscow, Leningradsii pr. 11

G. A. Lesnikov

State Budgetary Institution “Mosgorgeotrest”

Email: abakumova.nv@mail.ru
Russia, 123040, Moscow, Leningradsii pr. 11

V. S. Rekun

State Budgetary Institution “Mosgorgeotrest”

Email: abakumova.nv@mail.ru
Russia, 123040, Moscow, Leningradsii pr. 11

A. K. Petrov

State Budgetary Institution “Mosgorgeotrest”

Email: abakumova.nv@mail.ru
Russia, 123040, Moscow, Leningradsii pr. 11

References

  1. Boldyrev, G.G. [Three-dimensional modeling and visualization of engineering geological survey data. State-of-the-art and practical implementation]. Inzhenernye izyskaniya, 2022, vol. XVI, no. 1, pp. 8–26. (in Russian)
  2. [Geological atlas of Moscow (in 10 volumes with an explanatory note). Scale 1:10 000]. A.V. Antipov, Ed. Moscow, GUP “Mosgorgeotrest” Publ, 2012. (in Russian)
  3. Gulin, V.V. [Methods of reducing the dimension of the characteristic description of documents in the problem of text classification]. Vestnik Moskovskogo energeticheskogo instituta, 2013, no. 2, pp. 115–121. (in Russian)
  4. Zhidkov, R.Yu., Abakumova, N.V., Rekun, V.S. [Application of complex retrospective analysis in determining the configuration of man-made soil massifs on the example of Moscow]. Inzhenernaya geologiya, 2023, vol. XVIII, no. 1, pp. 18–34. (in Russian)
  5. Zakrevskii, K.E., Maisyuk, D.M., Syrtlanov, V.R. [Evaluation of the quality of 3D models]. Moscow, OOO “IPTS “Maska” Publ., 2008, 272 p. (in Russian)
  6. Zakrevskii, K.E., Popov, V.L. [The history of the development of three-dimensional geological modeling as a method of studying oil and gas deposits]. Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Inzhiniring georesursov, 2021, no. 5, pp. 89–100. (in Russian)
  7. Korolev, V.A. [On the problems of digitalization and artificial intelligence in engineering geology]. Inzhenernaya geologiya, 2021, vol. XVI, no. 1, pp. 10–23. (in Russian)
  8. Levyant, V.B., Ampilov, Yu.P., Glogovskii, V.M. et al. [Methodological recommendations on the use of seismic data (2D, 3D) for calculating oil and gas reserves]. Moscow, Ministry of Natural Resources. Central Geophysical Expedition, 2006, 39 p. (in Russian)
  9. Mikhailichenko, A.A. [Analytical review of methods for assessing the quality of classification algorithms]. Vestnik Adygeiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 4: Estestvenno-matematicheskie i tekhnicheskie nauki, 2022, no. 4 (311), pp. 52–59. (in Russian).
  10. [Technology of three-dimensional modeling of the geological environment and its approbation at the objects of the Moscow housing stock under the renovation program]. In: [75 years of engineering surveys in Moscow]. A.Yu. Serov et al, Eds. Tver, Talan Group, 2019, pp. 185–189. (in Russian)
  11. Trofimov, V.T., Korolev, V.A. [About the fundamental aspects of the genetic approach to the study of soils]. Inzhenernaya geologya, 2019, vol. XIV, no. 1, pp. 8–19. (in Russian)
  12. Shepeta, D.A., Golovin, E.N., Ivanova, M.S. [Quality metrics of machine learning algorithms in multiclassification tasks]. In: [Proc. of the GUAP scientific session on World Aviation and Cosmonautics Day]. St. Petersburg, 2019, Part II, pp. 278–281. (in Russian)
  13. Box, G.E.P. Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building. In: Robustness in statistics, R.L. Launer, G.N. Wilkinson, Eds. Academic Press, 1979, pp. 201–236.
  14. Baynes, F.J., Parry, S. Guidelines for the development and application of engineering geological models on projects. IAEG Commission 25 Publication, 2022, no. 1, 129 p.
  15. Geron, A. Hands-on machine learning with Scikit-Learn and TensorFlow. Sebastopol, OREILLY, 2019, 548 p.
  16. Tsai, W.P., Feng, D., Pan, M. et al. From calibration to parameter learning: harnessing the scaling effects of big data in geoscientific modeling. Nature Communications, 2021, vol. 12 (1), pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26107-z

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2.

Download (113KB)
3.

Download (756KB)
4.

Download (770KB)
5.

Download (910KB)
6.

Download (395KB)
7.

Download (134KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Р.Ю. Жидков, Н.В. Абакумова, Н.Н. Ракитина, Г.А. Лесников, В.С. Рекун, А.К. Петров

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies