Morphodynamic of the Kosa River Channel as a Reflection of the Direction of the Channel Processes in the Development Valleys of Glaciolacustrine Terraces (Upper Kama Basin)

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

Abstract

—The article is devoted to identification of peculiarities of development of channel processes in river valleys with distribution of glaciolacustrine terraces. Kosa river was chosen as the largest right tributary of the upper Kama. The resources of GoogleEarthPro and Yandex Maps were used in the process of interpretation of space images and obtaining quantitative information. The morphodynamic types of a river channel was made on the basis of the analysis of elements of floodplain-channel landscape complexes. The indicator of the ratio of the width of the floodplain to the width of the valley was considered as a feature of the development of channel processes in the areas of the distribution of the glaciolacustrine terrace. This ratio is 1 : 1 at the upper Kosa river outside the Kosinskaya Lowland. It is 1 : 9 at the middle Kosa river, and 1 : 3 at the Kosa downstream. The location of the meander belt in the left of the valley side is a feature of the development of channel processes. This indicates the presence of a stable and long-term planform channel changes from the east to the west in the past. The leading morphodynamic channel types are free meanders and confined straight channel for the Kosa upper stream. In the Kosa middle stream, in which most of the valley is represented by a glaciolacustrine terrace, confined bends already play a significant role in the structure of morphodynamic types of a river channel, while maintaining the leading role of free meanders. At the same time, a high proportion of the distribution of the straight confined channel is observed.

Авторлар туралы

N. Nazarov

The Pacific Geographical Institute of the Far Eastern branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: nikolainazarovpsu@gmail.com
Russia, Vladivostok

V. Petrova

Perm State university

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: verapetrova182000@gmail.com
Russia, Perm

I. Frolova

Perm State university

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: irvik13@gmail.com
Russia, Perm

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Bol’shiyanov D.Yu., Verkulich S.R. Kanaly stoka talyx lednikovyx vod i vozmozhnosti paleogeograficheskix rekonstrukcij // Izvestiya RGO. 1990. T. 122. Vyp. 1. S. 58–64.
  2. Dedkov A.P. Ekzogennoe rel’efoobrazovanie v Kazansko-Ul’yanovskom Povolzh’e. Kazan’: Izd-vo Kazan. un-ta, 1970. 255 s.
  3. Demakov D.A., Lychagina E.L., Zareczkaya N.E. i dr. Kosinskie mezoliticheskie stoyanki v kontekste istorii prirodnoj sredy Verxnego Prikam’ya v pozdnelednikov’e i rannem golocene // Geomorfologiya. 2023. № 1. S. 91–106.
  4. Zajcev V.K. K istorii sovremennyx dolin rek Visherki i Berezovki (pravyx pritokov Kolvy) // Izvestiya Vsesoyuzn. geogr. obshh-va. 1941. T. 73. Vyp. 2. S. 287–291.
  5. Zemczov A.A., Burakov D.A. Sovremennye geomorfologicheskie processy v central’noj chasti Zapadno-Sibirskoj ravniny // Problemy geomorfologii i neotektoniki platformennyx oblastej Sibiri. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1970. S. 87–99.
  6. Korotaev V.N., Mixajlov V.N., Babich D.B. i dr. Gidrologo-morfologicheskie processy, dinamika gidrograficheskoj seti i ruslovye deformacii v del’te r. Leny // Zemel’nye i vodnye resursy: protivoerozionnaya zashhita i regulirovanie rusel. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1990. S. 120–144.
  7. Lavrov A.S., Potapenko L.M. Neoplejstocen Pecherskoj nizmennosti i Zapadnogo Pritiman’ya (stratigrafiya, paleogeografiya, xronologiya). M.: OAO “Mozhajskij poligraficheskij kombinat”, 2012. 191 s.
  8. Lavrov A.S., Potapenko L.M. Neoplejstocen severo-vostoka Russkoj ravniny. M.: Ae`rogeologiya, 2005. 348 s.
  9. Maxinov A.N. Eolovye formy rel’efa v pojme reki Amur // Geomorfologiya. 2017. № 2. S. 52–62.
  10. Nazarov N.N., Egorkina S.S. Reki Permskogo Prikam’ya: Gorizontal`nye ruslovye deformacii. Perm’: Izd-vo “Zvezda”, 2004. 155 s.
  11. Ryabkov N.V. Perestrojka rechnyx sistem severo-vostoka Russkoj ravniny v svyazi s drevnimi oledeneniyami etogo rajona // Problemy perestrojki i perexvata rechnyx dolin. M., 1975. S. 59–70.
  12. Chalov R.S. Vliyanie eolovyh processov (faktora vetra) na formirovanie i morfologiyu rusel i pojm ravninnyx rek // Geograficheskij vestnik. 2022. № 2 (61). S. 6–16. https://doi.org/10.17072/2079-7877-2022-2-6-16
  13. Chalov R.S. Ruslovedenie: teoriya, geografiya, praktika. T. 2: Morfodinamika rechnyx rusel. M.: KRASAND, 2011. 960 s.
  14. Chalov R.S., Chalov S.R. Strukturnye urovni i morfodinamicheskaya klassifikaciya ruslovyx razvetvlenij // Vodnye resursy. 2020. T. 47. № 3. S. 259–271.
  15. Chalov R.S., Chalov S.R. Strukturnye urovni ruslovyx processov i morfodinamicheskie tipy rusla // Tridczat’ sed’moe plenar. mezhvuz. koordinacz. soveshhanie po problemam erozionnyx, ruslovyx i ust’evyx processov. M., 2022. S. 170–173.
  16. Chalov R.S., Shtankova N.N. Stok nanosov, rusloformiruyushhie rasxody vody i morfodinamicheskie tipy rusel rek bassejna Kamy // Voprosy fizicheskoj geografii i geoekologii Urala. Perm’, 2000. S. 99–116.
  17. Heggen M.P., Birks H.H., Heiri O., Grytnes J.A., Birks H.J.B. Are fossil assemblages in a single sediment core from a small lake representative of total deposition of mite, chironomid, and plant macrofossil remains? // Journal of Paleolimnology. 2012. 48: 669–691.


Осы сайт cookie-файлдарды пайдаланады

Біздің сайтты пайдалануды жалғастыра отырып, сіз сайттың дұрыс жұмыс істеуін қамтамасыз ететін cookie файлдарын өңдеуге келісім бересіз.< / br>< / br>cookie файлдары туралы< / a>