Regional Dynamics of Industry, Agriculture and Population in Russia in 1990–2020: Geoecological Interpretation

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Resumo

Abstract

—The grouping of Russian regions by the type of conjugate dynamics of industry, agriculture and population for 1990–2020, indirectly reflecting the dynamics of the integral anthropogenic load on nature, is carried out. The zones most severely affected by the transformational depression have been identified, which cover practically the entire European Non-Chernozem region, south of Eastern Siberia and the Far East. And a significant increase in loads is observed in the North Caucasus, the Russian Baltic States, the sub-latitude area of the regions stretching from the Bryansk region to Bashkortostan, as well as the Tyumen region. The increase in load occurred primarily within the steppe and forest-steppe zones, which were most transformed by anthropogenic activity. In general, “pressure” on nature increases in a well-developed territory (about 1/10 of the country, where about a third of the population lives), and decreases in a vast poorly developed territory (about half of the territory and 1/6 of the population of Russia). A new environmentally unfavorable trend in the dynamics of pressures on nature is their relative shift to coastal regions, to vulnerable to impacts and scarce in the country recreationally attractive coasts of the Atlantic seas, as well as the Caspian Sea-lake. It has been established that the increase in all types of loads in the leading regions is much more significant than their reduction in the regions of maximum decline. Therefore, the deterioration of the environmental situation in the regions of strong growth in loads is more likely than its improvement in the regions leading their decline. The increase in the load occurred primarily within the steppe and forest-steppe zones, most transformed by anthropogenic activity. In general, the “pressure” on nature increases in a well-developed area (about 1/10 of the country, where about a third of the population lives), and decreases in a vast underdeveloped area (about half of the territory and 1/6 of the population of Russia). A new environmentally unfavorable trend in the dynamics of loads on nature is their relative shift to the coastal regions, to the recreationally attractive coasts of the Atlantic seas, as well as the Caspian Sea–lakes, vulnerable to impacts and scarce in the country. It has been established that the increase in all types of loads in the leading regions is much more significant than their reduction in the regions of maximum recession. Therefore, the deterioration of the environmental situation in the regions of a strong increase in loads is more likely than its improvement in the regions-leaders of their decline.

Sobre autores

N. Klyuev

Institute of Geography RAS

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: klyuev@igras.ru
Russia, Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Bityukova V.R. Ekonomiko-geograficheskaya ocenka ekologicheskih posledstvij transformacii otraslevoj struktury hozyajstva regionov i gorodov Rossii v 2000–2020 gg. // Izv. RAN. Ser. geogr. 2022. № 3. S. 416–434.
  2. Geoekologicheskaya harakteristika gorodov Sibiri. Irkutsk: IG SO AN SSSR, 1990. 222 s.
  3. Gosudarstvennyj doklad “O sostoyanii i ispol’zovanii vodnyh resursov Rossijskoj Federacii v 2018 godu”. M.: NIA-Priroda, 2019. 290 s.
  4. Vodnye resursy Rossii i ih ispol’zovanie / Pod red. I.A. SHiklomanova. SPb.: GGI, 2008. 600 s.
  5. Danilov-Danil’yan V.I., Klyuev N.N. Prirodno-resursnaya sfera Rossii: tendencii razvitiya i zhelatel’nye strategii // Vyzovy i politika prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossii v XXI veke. M.: KMK, 2020. S. 111−147.
  6. Diffuznoe zagryaznenie vodnyh ob"ektov: problemy i resheniya. M.: Institut vodnyh problem RAN, 2020. 512 s.
  7. Druzhinin A.G., Lachininskij S.S. Rossiya v mirovom okeane: geoekonomicheskie i geopoliticheskie interesy, masshtab i formaty “prisutstviya” // Izv. RGO. 2019. T. 151. Vyp. 6. S. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869-607115161-19
  8. Zelenov A.S., Zelenova M.S. Vysokie urovni zagryazneniya poverhnostnyh vod Rossijskoj Federacii // Ispol’zovanie i ohrana prirodnyh resursov v Rossii. 2010. № 4. S. 50–53.
  9. Izrael’ Yu.A. Rol’ monitoringa dlya ocenki real’noj obstanovki i obespecheniya ekologicheskogo balansa // Nauchnye aspekty ekologicheskih problem Rossii. M., 2006. S. 12−16.
  10. Isachenko A.G. Ekologicheskaya geografiya Rossii. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2001. 328 s.
  11. Klyuev N.N. Poreformennaya transformaciya ekologicheskogo oblika rossijskih regionov // Izv. RGO. 2009. T. 141. Vyp. 3. S. 1–8.
  12. Klyuev N.N. Agrarnoe prirodopol’zovanie v rossijskih regionah: ekologo-resursnyj “dissonans” // Izv. RGO. 2017. T. 149. Vyp. 3. S. 4–15.
  13. Kommersant’’. 21 yanvarya 2013 g.
  14. Kommersant’’-Regeneraciya. № 177. 30 sentyabrya 2021 g.
  15. Kornienko S.G. Ocenka transformacij prirodnyh landshaftov Tazovskogo poluostrova po dannym kosmicheskoj s’’emki // Geografiya i prirodnye resursy. 2011. № 1. S. 67–73.
  16. Kotlyakov V.M., Losev K.S., Suetova I.A. Vlozhenie energii v territoriyu kak ekologicheskij indikator // Izv. RAN. Ser. geogr. 1995. № 3. S. 70–75.
  17. Kochurov B.I. Ekodiagnostika i sbalansirovannoe razvitie. M.-Smolensk: Madzhenta, 2003. 384 s.
  18. Lazhencev V.N. Sever Rossii: voprosy prostranstvennogo i territorial’nogo razvitiya. Syktyvkar: IS-EiEPS, 2015. 176 s.
  19. Losev K.S., Ananicheva M.D. Ekologicheskie problemy Rossii i sopredel’nyh territorij. M.: Noosfera, 2000. 283 s.
  20. Obzor fonovogo sostoyaniya okruzhayushchej prirodnoj sredy na territorii stran SNG za 2013–2014 gg. M.: Institut global’nogo klimata i ekologii, 2015. 138 s.
  21. Prilozhenie k Ezhegodniku “Social’no-ekonomicheskie pokazateli Rossijskoj Federacii” Social’no-ekonomicheskie pokazateli Rossijskoj Federacii v 1991–2020 gg. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/210/document/13396 (data obrashcheniya: 31.10.2022).
  22. Prilozhenie k sborniku “Regiony Rossii. Social’no-ekonomicheskie pokazateli” Social’no-ekonomicheskie pokazateli po sub"ektam Rossijskoj Federacii. 2000–2020. URL: http://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/210/document/47652 (data obrashcheniya: 31.10.2022).
  23. Prirodopol’zovanie v territorial’nom razvitii sovremennoj Rossii. M.: Mediapress, 2014. 360 s.
  24. Rossijskij statisticheskij ezhegodnik. 1994. M.: Goskomstat Rossii, 1994. 799 s.
  25. Tishkov A.A. Biosfernye funkcii prirodnyh ekosistem Rossii. M.: Nauka, 2005. 309 s.
  26. Tishkov A.A., Klyuev N.N. Ekosistemy v usloviyah postsovetskoj transformacii prirodopol’zovaniya // Racional’noe prirodopol’zovanie: mezhdunarodnye programmy, rossijskij i zarubezhnyj opyt. M.: KMK, 2010. S. 342–370.
  27. Trejvish A.I. Geografiya rossijskih krizisov // Izv. AN. Ser. geogr. 1999. № 2. S. 7–16.
  28. Hill F., Gaddy C.G. The Siberian curse: How communist planners left Russia out in the cold. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2003. 327 p.
  29. Mata F.J., Onisto L.J., Vallentyne J.R. Consumption: The other side of population for development // Ethics in science and environmental politics. 2012. № 1. Р. 15–20. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00122

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
2.

Baixar (215KB)
3.

Baixar (95KB)
4.

Baixar (1MB)


Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies