Fluid Composition during Crystallization of Olivine from Meimechites of the Guli Pluton, Maimecha-Kotuiskaya Province: Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Data

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The fluid composition from coeval melt and fluid inclusions in olivine phenocrysts (Fo92–89) from meimechites of the Guli alkaline-ultrabasic carbonatite pluton was studied using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The melt inclusions in olivine were fine-crystallized. Daughter phases in inclusions by scanning electron microscopy were represented by diopside, phlogopite, ilmenite, Ti-bearing magnetite, titanite, nepheline, sodalite, and xenogenic chromite. According to Raman spectrometry, the fluid inclusions were low-density and contained magnesite and water. During heating experiments, after melting of the last colorless daughter phase in melt inclusions at about 1300°C, the volume of the gas phase coexisting with the melt varied from 1/4 to 2/3 of the inclusion volume, indicating a heterogeneous state of the trapped mineral-forming environment. During olivine crystallization, the fluid phase was predominantly composed of hydrocarbons (83.0 rel. %), nitrogenated (7.2 rel. %) and sulfonated (3.4 rel. %) compounds, as well as H2O (5.9 rel. %) and CO2 (0.3 rel. %). The hydrocarbons and sulfonated compounds contained a relatively high amount of halogenated compounds (4.0 rel. %). The species diversity of fluid components amounted to 201 chemical compounds. Among the hydrocarbons, oxygenated components prevailed (74.5 rel. %), consisting of 34.0 rel. % alcohols and 9.9 rel. % esters, 11.4 rel. % aldehydes, 6.8 rel. % ketones, 12.2 rel. % carboxylic acids. Aliphatic and cyclic hydrocarbons constituted only 4.6 and 3.7 rel. %, respectively. Olivine crystallization occurred under relatively reducing conditions at H/(H+O) = 0.87. A comparison of the obtained data with those from olivine in olivinites of the Krestovskaya intrusion, showed that meimechites could not be the parental magma for olivinites of alkaline-ultramafic carbonatite massifs.

About the authors

L. I. Panina

Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: panina@igm.nsc.ru
Novosibirsk

E. Yu. Rokosova

Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: rokosovae@igm.nsc.ru
Novosibirsk

A. T. Isakova

Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk State University

Email: atnikolaeva@igm.nsc.ru
Novosibirsk; Novosibirsk

V. V. Sharygin

Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: panina@igm.nsc.ru
Novosibirsk

A. A. Tomilenko

Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: panina@igm.nsc.ru
Novosibirsk

T. A. Bul'bak

Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: panina@igm.nsc.ru
Novosibirsk

References

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Supplementary 1, ESM_1. Результаты ГХ-МС анализа газовой фазы, извлеченной при ударном разрушении оливина из меймечита Гулинского массива (видовое разнообразие 201 компонент)
Download (584KB)

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).