Email this article An Experience in Applying the Concept of Authorized Heritage Discourse in Russian Research
- Authors: Kupriyanov P.S.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Moscow School of Social and Economic Science
- Issue: No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 7-10
- Section: Special Theme of the Issue: Anthropology of Heritage: Critical Concepts in Russian Contexts (guest editor P.S. Kupriyanov)
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0869-5415/article/view/327418
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869541525020019
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TLGDJM
- ID: 327418
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
The article is a brief introduction to the issue’s special theme focusing on the “Anthropology of Heritage: Critical Concepts in Russian Contexts”. It presents the contributions by P.S. Kupriyanov, M.A. Mochalova, D.G. Chubukova and V.A. Tanailova, and characterizes them in the framework of scholarly debates around the influential concept of authorized heritage discourse (AHD) proposed by Laurajane Smith.
About the authors
P. S. Kupriyanov
Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow School of Social and Economic Science
Author for correspondence.
Email: kuprianov-ps@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9856-3159
Moscow
References
- Ananiev, V.G. 2014. Teoreticheskoe osmyslenie naslediia v sovremennoi zarubezhnoi istoriografii: “Avtorizovannyi diskurs naslediia” Loradzhin Smit [Theoretical Understanding of Heritage in Modern Foreign Historiography: “The Authorized Heritage Discourse” by Laurajane Smith]. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriia, Gumanitarnye nauki 3: 232–239.
- Gonzalez, P.A. 2018. The Heritage Machine: Fetishism and Domination in Maragateria, Spain. London: Pluto Press.
- Harrison, R. 2013. Heritage: Critical Approaches. London: Routledge.
- Kalinycheva, S.D. 2024. Kriticheskii povorot v izuchenii naslediia: ot vlastnogo diskursa k nizovym praktikam [A Critical Turn in Heritage Studies: From Power Discourse to Grassroots Practices]. Interaction. Interview. Interpretation 16 (4): 10–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2024.16.4.1
- Kolesnik, A.S., and A.V. Rusanov. 2022. Nasledie-kak-protsess: diskussii o kontsepte kul’turnogo naslediia v sovremennykh sotsial’nykh i gumanitarnykh naukakh [Heritage-as-Process: The Concept of Cultural Heritage in Contemporary Social Sciences and Humanities]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriia, Istoriia 58 (3): 58–69. https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2022-3-58-69
- Kurianova, T.S. 2019. Nematerial’noe kul’turnoe nasledie kak ob’ekt zarubezhnogo i rossiiskogo nauchnogo diskursa [Intangible Cultural Heritage as an Object of Foreign and Russian Scientific Discourse]. Gumanitarnye nauki v Sibiri 26 (4): 58–63.
- Nikolai, F.V. 2024. Emotsii, kul’turnoe nasledie i “nostal’giia po budushchemu” v kontseptsii Loradzhein Smit [Emotions, Cultural Heritage and “Nostalgia for the Future” in Works of Laurajane Smith]. Prepodavatel’ XXI vek 1 (2): 346–352. https://doi.org/10.31862/2073-9613-2024-1-346-352
- Palmer, R. 2009. Preface. In Heritage and Beyond, 7–8. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
- Smith, L. 2006. Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.
- Smith, L. 2021 Emotional Heritage: Visitor Engagement at Museums and Heritage Sites. London: Routledge.
- Schofield, J. ed. 2014. Who Needs Experts? Counter-mapping Cultural Heritage. London: Routledge.
- Thomas, R.M. 2008. Archaeology and Authority in the Twenty First Century. In The Heritage Reader, edited by G. Fairclough, R. Harrison, J. Schofield, and J.H. Jameson, Jnr., 139–148. New York: Routledge.
Supplementary files
