How indigenous australians try to preserve themselves

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article discusses personal and collective life ways of native people residing in remote settlements of the Cape York Peninsula, Australia, and offers a number of observations on the native population of Central Australia. It is drawn on the authors’ field materials collected in 2005, 2007-2009, 2015, and 2022. If set against the backdrop of the likewise framed project exploring the Evens and Evenkis of Eastern Siberia, the situation in faraway settlements of Australian Aboriginal people manifests both substantial similarities and important differences. Neither in the past when the colonization began to unfold, nor in the present did the Aboriginal people, for the most part, willingly join the commercial and entrepreneurial activities of the Australian mainstream circles or get involved in trade and economic relationships with the newcomers. They rather resisted, and still do, the authorities' and entrepreneurs' attempts at getting them involved in such relationships. We argue that the underlying reason behind that is the very character of the local traditional culture, the key aspects of which are consciously and resiliently preserved - even if sometimes in a transformed or deviant manner - by the native people.

About the authors

O. Y Artemova

Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences;Russian State University for the Humanities

Email: artemova.olga@list.ru

Y. A Artemova

Russian State University for the Humanities

Email: redfox712002@yandex.ru

References

  1. Артемова О.Ю. Некапиталистический этос в орбите капиталистического // Новые российские гуманитарные исследования. 2016. Вып. 11. http://www.nrgumis.ru/articles/1994
  2. Артемова О.Ю. Настоящий охотник - бедный охотник? ("Моральная экономика" и некоторые проблемы социальной эволюции) // Stratum plus. Археология и культурная антропология. 2018. № 1. С. 77-102.
  3. Берндт Р.М., Берндт К.Х. Мир первых австралийцев. М.: Наука, 1981.
  4. Bateson G. Culture Contact and Schismogenesis // Man. 1935. Vol. 35. P. 178-183. https://doi.org/10.2307/2789408
  5. Berndt R.М., Berndt С.H. The World of the First Australians. Sydney: Ure Smith, 1964.
  6. Bird-David N. The Giving Environment: Another Perspective on the Economic System of Gatherer-Hunters // Current Anthropology. 1990. Vol. 31 (2). P. 189 -196.
  7. Bird-David N. Beyond "The Hunting and Gathering Mode of Subsistence": Culture-Sensitive Observations on the Nayaka and Other Modern Hunter-Gatherers // Man. 1992. Vol. 27 (1). P. 19-44. https://doi.org/10.2307/2803593
  8. Graeber D., Wengrow D. The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity. N.Y.: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2021.
  9. Kowal E. Trapped in the Gap: Doing Good in Indigenous Australia. N.Y.: Berghahn, 2015.
  10. Martin D.F. Does Native Title Merely Provide an Entitlement to Be Native? Indigenes, Identities, and Applied Anthropological Practice // Australian Journal of Anthropology. 2015. Vol. 26 (1). P. 112-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/taja.12121
  11. Martin D.F., Martin B.F. Challenging Simplistic Notions of Outstations as Manifestations of Aboriginal Self-Determination: Wik Strategic Engagement and Disengagement over the Past Four Decades // Experiments in Self-Determination: Histories of the Outstation Movement in Australia / Eds. N. Peterson, F. Myers. Canberra: Australian National University Press, 2016. P. 210-228.
  12. Peterson N. Demand Sharing: Reciprocity and Pressure for Generosity among Foragers. American Anthropologist. 1993. Vol. 95 (4). P. 860-874.
  13. Peterson N. From Mode of Production to Moral Economy: Sharing and Kinship in Fourth World Social Orders // Ninth International Conference on Hunting and Gathering Societies: Hunter-Gatherer Studies and the Reshaping of Anthropology. Edinburgh, the Edinburgh Conference Center, 2002.
  14. Peterson N. What Can the Precolonial and Frontier Economies Tell Us about Engagement with the Real Economy? Indigenous Life Projects and the Conditions for Development // Culture, Economy and Governance in Aboriginal Australia / Eds. D. Austin-Broos, G. Macdonald. Sydney: Sydney University Press, 2005. P. 7-18.
  15. Peterson N. On the Persistence of Sharing: Personhood, Asymmetrical Reciprocity, and Demand Sharing in the Indigenous Australian Domestic Moral Economy // Australian Journal of Anthropology. 2013. Vol. 24 (2). P. 166-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/taja.12036
  16. Peterson N. Place, Personhood and Marginalization: Ontology and Community in Remote Desert Australia // Anthropologica. 2015. Vol. 57 (9). P. 491-500.
  17. Peterson N. What Is the Policy Significance of the Hybrid Economy? // Engaging Indigenous Economy: Debating Diverse Approaches / Ed. W. Sanders. Canberra: Australian National University Press, 2016. P. 55-64.
  18. Peterson N. Beyond Narratives of Aboriginal Self-Deliverance: Land Rights and Anthropological Visibility in the Australian Public Domain // Anthropological Forum: A Journal of Social Anthropology and Comparative Sociology. 2022. Vol. 32 (2). P. 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2022.2084716
  19. Sahlins М. Stone Age Economics. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, 1972.
  20. Sutton P., Walshe K. Farmers or Hunter-Gatherers? The Dark Emu Debate. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing, 2021.
  21. Sutton P. The Politics of Suffering: Indigenous Australia and the End of the Liberal Consensus. Carlton: Melbourne University Press, 2009.
  22. Thomson D. Donald Thomson in Arnhem Land / Ed. N. Peterson. Carlton: Miegunyah Press, 2003.
  23. Woodburn J.C. Sharing Is Not a Form of Exchange: An Analysis of Property-Sharing in Immediate Return Hunter-Gatherer Societies // Property Relations: Renewing the Anthropological Tradition / Ed. C.M. Hann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. P. 48-63.

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies