What did evenks get from modernization? global projects of the century and people's destinies

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article is based mainly on the materials of the expeditions of 2021-2022 to the areas of close cohabitation of Evenks and Russians - the Verkhnebureinsky district of the Khabarovsk Territory and the Severo-Baikalsky district of the Republic of Buryatia. The territories adjacent to the Baikal-Amur Railway were under the influence of an aggressive policy of modernization, which led to significant transformations in the habitual way of life of the indigenous peoples of the North (often abbreviated in Russian as KMNS , standing for korennye malochislennye narody severa ) - in the conditions that prevailed after the construction of the highway and related infrastructure, it became impossible to use traditional ways of subsistence such as reindeer herding, hunting and fishing. Many representatives of the indigenous peoples of the North were unable to adapt to the changed realities. We argue that there is a need for close cooperation between federal authorities, such as the Federal Agency for Ethnic Affairs of the Russian Federation, with the Russian Association of Indigenous Peoples of the North and with Evenk business entities. The central federal authorities should rely less on the reports of local authorities, while constantly monitoring the real situation. It is necessary to pay as much attention as possible to protecting the rights of the indigenous peoples of the North to conducting a traditional economy. This means not only combating violations or abuses within existing laws, but also overhauling the existing model, which often leaves the Evenks vulnerable to exploitation of their lands by private entrepreneurs and tenants. In addition, it is the government of the country that is responsible for creating favorable conditions for changing the activities of those Evenki who do not want or cannot run a traditional economy, which implies improving access to education and creating new jobs, as well as strengthening social support measures.

About the authors

D. A Dolgikh

Russian State University for the Humanities

Email: dolgikh-dmit@yandex.ru

M. A Shchekin

Russian State University for the Humanities

Email: smofficial@mail.ru

References

  1. Акимов Ю.Г. Северная Америка и Сибирь в конце XVI - середине XVIII в. Очерк сравнительной истории колонизаций. СПб.: Изд-во Санкт-Петербургского гос. ун-та, 2010.
  2. Виноградова С.Н. Формирование государственной политики в отношении коренных малочисленных народов Севера, Сибири и Дальнего Востока: ретроспективный анализ // Труды Кольского научного центра РАН (Апатиты). 2010. № 2. С. 127-139.
  3. Гаер Е.А., Батьянова Е.П., Шпинев В.Н. Коренные малочисленные народы Нижнего Амура в постсоветской действительности. Исследования по прикладной и неотложной этнологии. 2014. Вып. 228.
  4. Долгих Д.А., Корытин Г.С., Щекин М.А. В Верхнебуреинском районе Хабаровского края и Северо-Байкальском районе Республики Бурятия // Новые российские гуманитарные исследования (электронный журнал). 2021. Вып. 16. http://www.nrgumis.ru/articles/2173
  5. Забияко А.П. и др. Эвенки Приамурья: оленная тропа истории и культуры. Благовещенск: РИО, 2012.
  6. Поровознюк О.А. Городские аборигены БАМа: индустриальный бум, техносоциальные сети и борьба за ресурсы // Этнографическое обозрение. 2016. № 1. C. 23-41.
  7. Сирина А.А. Эвенки и эвены в современном мире: самосознание, природопользование, мировоззрение. М.: Восточная литература, 2012.
  8. Тураев В.А. Охотничий промысел коренных малочисленных народов Дальнего Востока в условиях постсоветской трансформации (1990-2010) // Россия и АТР. 2021. № 4. C. 12-27.
  9. Шубин А.С. Эвенки. Улан-Удэ: Республиканская типография, 2007.

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies