Medical laboratory staff labor cost analysis and modeling for SARS-CoV-2 RNA PCR-testing: A time-and-motion study
- Authors: Ivoylov O.O.1,2,3, Kochetov A.G.4,5, Mininkova A.I.6,7
-
Affiliations:
- People's Friendship University of Russia
- Central Research Institute of Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Medical and Rehabilitation Center «Izumrud»
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
- Multidisciplinary Medical Center of the Bank of Russia
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
- Issue: Vol 28, No 2 (2022)
- Pages: 103-117
- Section: Original Research Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0869-2106/article/view/108935
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/medjrf108935
- ID: 108935
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the main method for detecting the viral agent of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). This analysis is performed in a non-automated mode in many medical laboratories, which implies a significant labor intensity of a test. However, its magnitude, as well as the workload on staff in the context of variability in testing volumes, has not yet been quantified due to the lack of systematic approaches to studying the labor costs of laboratory staff.
AIM: This study aimed to investigate the structure and magnitude of the labor cost components of laboratory staff when performing manual PCR for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ribonucleic acid (RNA) and obtain stratified data that characterize the labor intensity of the testing, which are suitable for workload modeling.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study of the labor costs (as labor time) of the PCR laboratory staff was conducted based on the Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory of the Multidisciplinary Medical Center of the Bank of Russia using a time-and-motion study methodology. Hence, the author’s method for researching the labor costs of medical laboratory staff was applied.
RESULTS: The lists of standard manipulations of the time-studied labor process were formed workplaces, the manipulations were classified according to the labor cost components, and the duration of each component was statistically determined. The labor intensity per test under current working conditions was 110.2 s for the «reception and registration», 144.6 s for «RNA extraction», and 79.4 s for «reaction mixture preparation/amplification» workplaces. The workload magnitude for the personnel of these workplaces corresponded to 47%, 62%, and 34% of a lab specialist’s annual working rate budget. The stratification of labor costs into fixed and variable allowed us to model the workload depending on the change in the testing volume and the number of analytical runs, as well as develop nomograms for the annual total labor time calculation.
CONCLUSION: The proposed approach to labor cost accounting and analysis makes it possible to obtain suitable stratified data for modeling the workload of personnel during manual PCR-testing for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The developed nomograms based on them can serve the purposes of planning the laboratory work and increasing its efficiency by choosing the optimal schemes for organizing the labor process. The obtained data can be used in other laboratories that perform real-time PCR tests for molecular genetic markers.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Oleg O. Ivoylov
People's Friendship University of Russia; Central Research Institute of Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery; Medical and Rehabilitation Center «Izumrud»
Email: kbld@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4684-8440
SPIN-code: 9269-9284
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), assistant lecturer
Russian Federation, 6, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, 117198; Moscow; MoscowAnatoly G. Kochetov
Institute of Laboratory Medicine; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: ag_kochetov@dpo-ilm.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3632-291X
SPIN-code: 3370-2093
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), professor
Russian Federation, 6, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, 117198; MoscowAnna I. Mininkova
Multidisciplinary Medical Center of the Bank of Russia; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Author for correspondence.
Email: koann@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7422-7476
SPIN-code: 7872-8803
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), assistant professor
Russian Federation, 6, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, 117198; MoscowReferences
- Abduljalil JM. Laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2: available approaches and limitations. New Microbes New Infect. 2020;36:100713. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100713
- Sander A-L, Yadouleton A, Moreira-Soto A, et al. An Observational Laboratory-Based Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Diagnostics in Benin, Western Africa. mSphere. 2021;6(1):e00979–20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00979-20
- Campbell JR, Uppal A, Oxlade O, et al. Active testing of groups at increased risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 in Canada: costs and human resource needs. CMAJ. 2020;192(40):E1146–E1155. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.201128
- Neilan AM, Losina E, Bangs AC, et al. Clinical Impact, Costs, and Cost-effectiveness of Expanded Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Testing in Massachusetts. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(9):e2908–e2917. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1418
- Daniel EA, Esakialraj LBH, Anbalagan S, et al. Pooled Testing Strategies for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis: A comprehensive review. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021;101(2):115432. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115432
- Abdalhamid B, Bilder CR, Garrett JL, Iwen PC. Cost Effectiveness of Sample Pooling to Test for SARS-CoV-2. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2020;14(10):1136–1137. doi: 10.3855/jidc.13935
- Yakymenko Y, Bychenko A, Bielawski M, et al. Online Presentation of the Assessments «Ukraine 2020–2021: Inflated Expectations, Unexpected Challenges» [Internet]. Kyiv: Razumkov Centre, 2021 [cited 2022 March 8]. Available from: https://razumkov.org.ua/en/news/online-presentation-of-the-assessments-ukraine-2020-2021-inflated-expectations-unexpected-challenges
- Bailey AL, Ledeboer N, Burnham C-AD. Clinical Microbiology Is Growing Up: The Total Laboratory Automation Revolution. Clin Chem. 2019;65(5):634–643. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.274522
- Francesconi A, Kasai M, Harrington SM, et al. Automated and Manual Methods of DNA Extraction for Aspergillus fumigatus and Rhizopus oryzae Analyzed by Quantitative Real-Time PCR. J Clin. Microbiol. 2008;46(6):1978–1984. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02246-07
- Amendola A, Coen S, Belladonna S, et al. Improving clinical laboratory efficiency: a time-motion evaluation of the Abbott m2000 RealTime and Roche COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan PCR systems for the simultaneous quantitation of HIV-1 RNA and HCV RNA. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49(8):1283–1288. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.625
- Ivoylov OO, Kochetov AG. A method for analyzing the typical structure of direct costs in the cost of a laboratory test. Klin Lab Diagn. 2021;66(3):187–192. doi: 10.51620/0869-2084-2021-66-3-187-192
- Ivoylov OO. The method for researching the labor costs of staff of medical laboratory. [Internet]. Oct 2, 2021. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355031944_Metodika_issledovania_trudozatrat_personala_medicinskoj_laboratorii. Accessed: July 6, 2022. (In Russ). doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.12058.57288