Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат  Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді  Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Том 53, № 2 (2017)

Article

Results of seismological data processing for the territory of Armenia

Burmin V., Shemeleva I., Fleyfel L., Avetisyan A., Kazaryan K.

Аннотация

The distribution of earthquake hypocenters in the territory of Armenia is obtained based on data from seismological bulletins for 1970–2012. It is shown that in addition to crustal earthquakes, there are deep earthquakes with a hypocenter depth down to 300 km. The seismicity is concentrated primarily in the northwest of the republic in the region adjacent to the Javakheti Upland. The positions of the main shock and the aftershocks of the December 1988 Spitak earthquake are determined separately. It is shown that the aftershocks of this earthquake cover a big area, extending to a depth of 100 km, although most of them are located at a depth of ~27 km.

Seismic Instruments. 2017;53(2):103-110
pages 103-110 views

Attenuation of seismic waves from moderate earthquakes of the Vrancea zone

Aptikaev S., Aptikaeva O.

Аннотация

The paper presents results of studying the attenuation of ground accelerations from earthquakes of the Vrancea with magnitudes less that 6.0 at distance greater than 300 km in a narrow sector located northeast of the focal region, within the limits of which are located acting and planned nuclear power plants (NNPs). Attenuation of peak ground accelerations in individual sections along the Vrancea–IRIS OBN station path is approximated by individual functions. It is shown that for a rough estimation of the seismic effect of earthquakes from the Vrancea zone it is acceptable to use the empirical relationship obtained by F.F. Aptikaev. For a more accurate estimate, it needs to be modified by adding a constant, whose value depends on the specific conditions of the NPP sites. It is shown that the results of data analysis on moderate earthquakes can be extrapolated to an earthquake with the maximum possible magnitude for the Vrancea zone and used to estimate the maximum seismic effects at the sites of operating and planned NPPs.

Seismic Instruments. 2017;53(2):111-123
pages 111-123 views

On tectonic character of the connection zones of the Earth’s crust in the South Caspian Basin and Scythian–Turan plate based on seismological data

Mammadli T., Rogozhin E.

Аннотация

The features of the spatial distribution of earthquake sources in the South Caspian Basin (SCB) are considered in relation to the regional deep structure. The results of analysis showed that the SCB and Scythian–Turan plate are divided by deep faults of small length with a west–northwest trending. These faults are included in the Apsheron–Balkhan threshold zone. The opinion of some researchers about subduction of the SCB crust under the epi-Hercynian platform of the northern Caspian Sea has not been confirmed.

Seismic Instruments. 2017;53(2):124-133
pages 124-133 views

Seismogenic deformations in the walls of the late medieval Yeni-Kale fortress in Eastern Crimea

Belik Y., Korzhenkov A., Kulikov A., Larkov A., Marahanov A., Ovsyuchenko A., Rogozhin E.

Аннотация

The results of a macroseismic study of the late medieval Turkish Yeni-Kale fortress in Eastern Crimea are described. Despite the fact that the fortress’ structures were considerably affected by local landslide activity, military operations during the Crimean War, the Civil War, and the WWII, as well as by anthropogenic factors, such as railroads, etc., numerous specific deformations in the fortress walls suggest that the existing destruction and damage might be explained by strong seismic impacts. The local intensity of seismic oscillations could be I = (VIII)–IX points according to the MSK-64 macroseismic scale, and the direction of the combined maximum seismic impact could have a NW–SE strike. It is likely that the Turks abandoned the fortress without a battle because of its significant seismic damage and destruction in the 18th century, which had not yet been repaired by the time the Russian army arrived.

Seismic Instruments. 2017;53(2):134-145
pages 134-145 views

A new generation Russian seismic scale

Aptikaev F., Erteleva O.

Аннотация

The paper discusses a draft national standard, Earthquake Intensity Scale. The characteristics of the new scale are described, as well as its difference from other seismic intensity scales. Consideration is given to the continuities between the new scale and previous ones. Comments and suggestions concerning the text of the scale are analyzed.

Seismic Instruments. 2017;53(2):146-154
pages 146-154 views

Problematic historical earthquakes in the Baikal region

Chipizubov A.

Аннотация

Macroseismic data on strong historical earthquakes of the 18th–19th centuries are presented that are unknown to a wide range of seismologists and therefore missing in earthquake catalogs. The data are related to such earthquakes as the 1715 (1716) Nerchinsk and 1727 Kirensk, and ones occurred in the southern Baikal region in 1809 and in the region near cape of Svyatoi Nos in 1862. Additional information about the earthquake of 1771 is given that considerably refines the parameters of this event. The earthquakes of 1725, 1742, 1772, and 1885 and interpretations of evidence doubted by various researchers are also considered.

Seismic Instruments. 2017;53(2):155-172
pages 155-172 views

On the accuracy of initial seismological data in the problem of seismic hazard assessment

Tatevossian R., Mokrushina N.

Аннотация

The parameters of the September 3, 1978, earthquake in the Western Caucasus are presented according to data from different seismological agencies. This event, along with the 1966 earthquake in Anapa, is the strongest seismic event in the region. The solutions suggested in the main international and national seismological agencies contradict the well-known fact that the earthquake did not have catastrophic consequences. This is confirmed only by the position of the epicenter according to GCMT data intended for determining somewhat different earthquake parameters: the focal mechanism and seismic moment. Despite the fact that there was no expedition to perform a macroseismic study of the earthquake, some information was collected by phone survey. Information on the spatial distribution of the macroseismic effect made it possible to more accurately determine the epicenter position according to the GCMT data.

Seismic Instruments. 2017;53(2):173-180
pages 173-180 views

Осы сайт cookie-файлдарды пайдаланады

Біздің сайтты пайдалануды жалғастыра отырып, сіз сайттың дұрыс жұмыс істеуін қамтамасыз ететін cookie файлдарын өңдеуге келісім бересіз.< / br>< / br>cookie файлдары туралы< / a>