Seismic Impact of Industrial Blasts in Western Siberia and Induced Seismicity


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Based on data from regional seismic networks and experiments employing temporary networks, the degree of seismic impact of industrial blasts in southwestern Siberia is studied. Since the blasts at all mining enterprises were ripple-fired shots, magnitudes are studied proceeding from the total explosive charge and the dependence of magnitudes on the delay stage. On average, there is a slight increase in magnitudes with increase in total charge and the charge of a stage, but strong scatter of data from the averaged straight line is observed. It is quite common that large magnitudes are recorded for blasts with smaller charges of stages. The noted experimental features are explained by the coincidence of triggering time for wells in different rows: this intensifies the interference of seismic impact of incorrectly detonated blasts (the technology of ripple-fired shots is not rigorously implemented). The monitoring system made it possible to study the seismic impact of mining enterprises recovering mineral resources in the regional subsurface. Comparison with the recorded induced seismicity shows that open pit mines with the strongest industrial blasts do not demonstrate the strongest induced seismicity. The absence of technogenic earthquakes near excavations with high explosive energy has been established and, on the contrary, the existence of induced seismicity has been revealed in places where there is no direct blast impact on the activated zone.

About the authors

A. F. Emanov

Altay–Sayan Branch, Geophysical Survey, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: alex@gs.nsc.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090

A. A. Emanov

Altay–Sayan Branch, Geophysical Survey, Russian Academy of Sciences; Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: alex@gs.nsc.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090; Novosibirsk, 630090

A. V. Fateev

Altay–Sayan Branch, Geophysical Survey, Russian Academy of Sciences; Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: alex@gs.nsc.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090; Novosibirsk, 630090

E. V. Shevkunova

Altay–Sayan Branch, Geophysical Survey, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: alex@gs.nsc.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090

U. Yu. Vorona

Altay–Sayan Branch, Geophysical Survey, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: alex@gs.nsc.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090

N. A. Serezhnikov

Altay–Sayan Branch, Geophysical Survey, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: alex@gs.nsc.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090


Copyright (c) 2019 Allerton Press, Inc.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies