Isolation, Purification and some Properties of Staphylolytic Enzyme from  Staphylococcus hyicus

T. V. Fedorov; Федоров Т. В.; M. G. Teymurazov; Теймуразов М. Г.; A. K. Surin; Сурин А. К.; O. I. Tazina; Тазина О. И.; S. F. Biketov; Бикетов С. Ф.

doi:10.31857/S0555109923050057

Isolation, Purification and some Properties of Staphylolytic Enzyme from Staphylococcus hyicus

Авторлар: Fedorov T.¹, Teymurazov M.¹, Surin A.¹, Tazina O.¹, Biketov S.¹
Мекемелер:
1. “State Research Center for Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology” of the Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare
Шығарылым: Том 59, № 5 (2023)
Беттер: 457-464
Бөлім: Articles
URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0555-1099/article/view/138812
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0555109923050057
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WTWAXK
ID: 138812

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық

Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық

Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация
Авторлар туралы
Әдебиет тізімі
Қосымша файлдар
Статистика

Аннотация

The paper presents data on the identification of a new staphylolytic enzyme from the cultural liquid of Staphylococcus hyicus B-8870. The primary sequence of the enzyme has the maximum similarity to the CHAP domain of N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase from Staphylococcus sciuri DD 4747. The enzyme is active against a wide range of microorganisms of the Staphylococcus genus, including MRSA strains. The molecular weight of the enzyme is 13993 Da, the absorption coefficient at 280 nm is \(\varepsilon \frac{{{\text{mg}}}}{{{\text{ml}}}}\) 3.94, the value of the isoelectric point pI 10.35. The specific activity of the enzyme in relation to the cell suspension of S.aureus FDA 209P is 1518 U/mg with an optimum pH of 7.7 and a temperature of 40°C.

Негізгі сөздер

Staphylococcus hyicus, CHAP domain, Staphylolytic enzyme, MRSA

Әдебиет тізімі

Karam G., Chastre J., Wilcox M., Vincent J.-L. // Critical Care. 2016. V. 20. P. 136–145.
Vermassen A., Leroy S., Talon R., Provot C., Popowska M., Desvaux M. // Front. Microbiol. 2019. V. 10. P. 331–358.
Son B., Kong M., Ryu S. // Viruses. 2018. V. 10. P. 284–296.
Fujiki J., Nakamura T., Furusawa T., Ohno H., Takahashi H., Kitana J., Usui M., Higuchi H., Tanji Y., Tamura Y., Iwano H. // Pharmaceuticals. 2018. V. 11. P. 25–44.
Bateman A., Rawlings N.D. // Trends Biochem. Sci. 2003. V. 28. P. 234–237.
Rigden D.J., Jedrzejas M.J., Galperin M.Y. // Trends Biochem. Sci. 2003. V. 28. P. 230–234.
Llull D., Lopez R., Garcia E. // FEBS Lett. 2006. V. 580. P. 1959–1964.
Becker S.C., Dong S., Baker J.R., Foster-Frey J., Pritchard D.G., Donovan D. M. // FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2009. V. 294. P. 52–60.
Frankel M.B., Schneewind O. // J. Biol. Chem. 2012. № 287. P. 10460–10471.
Zou Y., Hou C. // Comput. Biol. Chem. 2010. V. 34. P. 251–257.
Li X., Wang S., Nyaruaba R., Liu H., Yang H., Wei H.A. // Antibiotics. 2021. V. 10. P. 461–474.
Ennahar S., Sashihara T., Sonomoto K., Ishizaki A. // FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2000. V. 24. P. 85–106.
Alispahic M., Hummel K., Jandreski-Cvetkovic D. et al. // J. Med. Microbiol. 2010. V. 59. P. 295–301.
Laemmli U.K. // Nature. 1970. V. 227 № 5259. P. 680–685.
Heath L.S., Gargis S.R., Smithberg S.R., Johnson H.P., Heath H.E., LeBlanc P.A., Sloan G.L. // FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2005. V. 249. P. 227–231.
J., Yang R., Yu S., Zhao W. // J Dairy Sci. 2021. V. 104. P. 2641–2653.